Your offense might be deep if...
What a month of October, and November is already setting up to hopefully be a good one to try to run away and hide from the division. As Bubba pointed out, the Canes lead the league in goals right now.
Here are a few illustrations of the depth of the Canes' offense right now. I would suspect that no other team in the league could answer yes to many/any of these right now:
Your offense might be deep if:
-Â 3 of 5 players on your 1st powerplay unit come from your 3rd and 4th lines.
- Despite being 2nd in the league (only 1 back) in goal scoring, Eric Staal cannot break the 1st powerplay unit right now.
- 2 players on your 3rd line are averaging a point a game.
- The team notched 5 last night, but this was by no means 1 of the team's top 2-3 most impressive offensive nights this young season.
- You are minus 2 top 9 forwards who were expected to contribute scoring, and it does not seem to matter right now.
- Someone like Sergei Gonchar might outscore your entire defense (right now he is tied with 2 goals and only down 4 assists), but it just does not matter. With forwards filling the point on the powerplay and the scoring up front, not a single word has been said about the need for offensive contributions from the blueline (it was said last season).
Who can come up with a couple more? The list seems like it could be endless right now.
Go Canes!
3 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Hey Matt, welcome back!
Your offense might be deep if your goalie is trying harder than your defensemen to get an assist!
by Bubba on Nov 6, 2007 11:22 AM EST reply actions
I think a good one to add would be “Your fourth-line center (Hamilton) has a legitimate shot at being a 20-goal scorer” or “Your leading scorer from the previous year is on your third line”.
by PenaltyKiller on Nov 6, 2007 2:10 PM EST reply actions
It’s tough for me to watch Eastern games, living on the west coast, but the Canes look pretty good this season. I’ll have to seek out some games and watch them
by jibblescribbits on Nov 7, 2007 11:35 AM EST reply actions

by 


















