Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Dog Football! Which Breeds Are Best Suited For The Gridiron?

Should the Canes be Buyers or Sellers?

The All Star break is officially here and the Hurricanes can find some satisfaction in the fact that they are currently in 8th place in the Eastern Conference. Their 51 points put them in the playoffs for now, although that spot is tenuous at best.

Lurking right behind the Hurricanes are the Florida Panthers with 50 points. The problem? The Panthers have only played 46 games and have two games in hand on the Canes. Caniacs can well remember last year when the Caps had a game in hand and jumped over the Hurricanes with a win on their very last game of the year.

Also close behind are the Pittsburgh Penguins, a dangerous team even with their recent struggles. You can bet that they will be a formidable opponent before it's all said and done.

All of this leads to a question. Should the Canes be looking to add some help before the trade deadline? Their 121 goals scored is the lowest number in the top 12 teams in the East. Even Toronto has scored more. (136). Logic would dictate that if the Canes added another player, it should be a forward.

James Mirtle recently looked at some of the players who will be available at the deadline. Let's review his list and see if any of the forwards could help.


  1. Bill Guerin

  2. Doug Weight

  3. Mike Comrie

  4. Keith Tkachuk

  5. Andy McDonald

  6. Steve Sullivan

  7. Kyle Calder

  8. Mike Sillinger

  9. Gary Roberts

  10. Nick Antropov

  11. Derek Armstrong

  12. Mark Recchi

  13. Radek Bonk

  14. Chris Gratton

  15. Chris Neil


Do any of these names get you excited? Would any of these guys help? The bad part about adding someone is that it would cost the franchise a valuable draft pick or two. Is it worth it?

On the other side of the coin, the Canes could be looking to trade an asset and try to acquire some extra draft picks or prospects before the deadline. Of course, the playoffs should be nearly out of reach before they consider that course of action, but that is a distinct possibility.

What do you think? Should the Canes be buyers and who would you like to see them acquire?

Star-divide

Comment 18 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

I don’t profess to be an expert on hockey, but it seems to me that the Canes are an old team that may be nearing the end of its peak. If it was me, I’d set up a plan for both scenarios. If the Canes are out of it by late Feburary, or have lost major ground, start selling off veterans for picks and prospects. If we’re still in the race, try to acquire a decent scoring forward. One of the other advantages to fireselling type moves is that we’d score a higher draft pick this year. And from what I know about our farm, we could use all the help we could get.

by David on Jan 22, 2009 1:34 AM EST reply actions  

I agree with David- although I would hate to watch the Canes sell off veteran players for prospects, even if we make the playoffs this year, I cannot see us going very far. I would rather mortgage the present to perhaps have a better future. Although we have been plagued by injuries over the past two years, had we been healthy, we still would not have been good enough to make a strong run at the cup. We need to go out and get lucky like the Pens and the Caps- draft the next Malkin or Ovechkin. Call me crazy, but this team doesnt have what it takes to make a deep run. I am a caniac, but I am logical about my expectations.

by Matt on Jan 22, 2009 2:41 AM EST reply actions  

In a market like this, with teams allegedly struggling to pay their bills(i.e. Phoenix and Tampa) I don’t really think it’s a good idea to start a ‘rebuilding’ process just two years removed from winning it all. This is not an old team, we have a couple of older guys but the players who have the longest left on their contracts are young and talented. If the Canes are still in the hunt come playoff time, I’d like to see them go for a big physical guy that can score, ala Keith Tkachuk or Bill Guerin. If we aren’t in the hunt, look for a lot of new faces next year. Regardless of either however, it’ll be a busy offseason for the front office. Oh, and keep Ruutuu, for god’s sakes keep Ruutuu…

by goalie matt on Jan 22, 2009 7:36 AM EST reply actions  

What veterans do you think we have to sell? Use 30 as the cut off, we got:
Brindy
Brookbank
Corvo
Cullen
Kaberle
Samsinov
Walker
Wallin
Whitney

These are the on ice guys. I look at that list and Corvo, Cullen, Samsinov, Whitney (maybe Walker) are the only guys you will get anything for and probably not much. So this “veteran” thing is absurd. JR dug a bif phucking hole and filled it with younger guys with “potential” and had a sprinkle of veteran savvy. Winning or losing, I see only two options for this team. The best option is they get together and start to kick ass. I have seen spurts of real good hockey, the D with a little time should be very good, I’d like the Kaberle/Wallin thing to go away, but whatever. Up front you have a very young core of guys that just haven’t found the way to score. They have in the past, just need the warm fuzzy of a stable situation and system they are into.

Other option is the fire sale. Sell real players. Cullen, Pitkanin, Williams, Corvo, Eaves, Larose, Ruutu, Sami, etc. They all have some value and shed cap weight until you get down to a level to make the minimum cap number and rebuild with whatever drafts and potential guys you can grab.

I just don’t see PK as the guy who’s gonna pony up for a single or two players. Face it, if we could get Gretz in his prime right now, it still would not look like a team that can make a deep run. Mostly, we will hit Boston and I don’t see any team in the East taking them 4 games. Yea that’s defeatist, it’s also pragmatic. Maybe doing a protracted sell off with eyes on one or two Vets later towards March that can be signed or picked up with years left on the contract.

In all honesty, even when this team is cooking, if, IF they make the PO’s they gotta take the craps 4 games. No easy task, then comes a round with Devils, Rangers, Habs and probably have to go through Boston no matter what. This year has just not worked real good. With another year together it could be a whole diff. ballgame. Maybe not. I just don’t think first round of PO’s is really worth much more than maybe hiring Mo for a couple more and I don’t know how I like that. The craps won’t trade O, the Wings won’t trade Zetterburg (or anyone else they keep), Pens Crosby/Malkin and we aren’t going to shed Staal. I also don’t think Sutter’s going anywhere. Other than that you got guys that aren’t tradeable, Brindy, probably Walker are two that are old enough to say hey I’m here and not going anywhere else. I don’t see JR and PK having alot of options. I think they are goping to keep this team, find a way to sign Ruutu and hire Mo. Maybe some goalie action, but Wards here to stay. I think JR’s hole is big enough that they don’t have a choice but, to try again next year with what they brung to the track.

I think Rod retires and free’s up enough coin to keep Ruutu.

My .02 and worth what ya paid for it.

A

by Paladin6 on Jan 22, 2009 8:18 AM EST reply actions  

Buyers. Any time you can make the playoffs, you need to do it. The extra revenue is one reason but for the health of the franchise. You can’t have your fan base thinking you aren’t willing to make a move. This team is no worse than the 2002 team. It can happen if you just get in.

Rod has looked better lately. I wonder if this break will help a bit. If he is not seeing improvement in the knee, he needs to consider hanging them up. Realistically.

by Ken on Jan 22, 2009 8:36 AM EST reply actions  

I don’t think that question can be answered until the deadline, which is still about a month and a half away. A lot can happen between now and then.

If we make a deal, I would like to see the kind of move we made last year swinging Corvo and Eaves for Stillman and Commodore. No matter what happens, I don’t want to see us trading any higher end prospects or draft picks.

by DaleCooper on Jan 22, 2009 8:50 AM EST reply actions  

Rod retiring would free up actual money but not cap space. Because he was extended after the age of 35, Carolina will see the cap hit on his entire deal. Not a huge issue for the team b/c they work based on a budget, not the cap, but it could be a problem if the cap were to go down. Regardless, Rod’s not going to hang ‘em up yet, I don’t think.

I agree with Ken. Making it to the playoffs is big for this franchise, and while I wouldn’t swing anything big, I think a couple role players could suit the team well (think something like the Scott Pellerin acquisition a few years back). I think the best thing they can get is a body for in front of the net on the PP. Ruutu fills that role on one unit, but they could use another. I also wouldn’t mind someone like Laperriere who can play and enforce — though Colorado would have to be out of the race to start moving guys.

All this is dependent on the team playing well leading up to the deadline. If they don’t, I definitely think Seidenberg or Babchuk could go, maybe even LaRose. If a team gets desperate for a puck mover, Kaberle could go, too (regardless of if the team is a buyer or seller).

by Cory on Jan 22, 2009 9:24 AM EST reply actions  

Our lack of depth at center is obvious (after Staal, the # 2, 3, and 4 centers are average and interchangeable – in my opinion). Sutter gets a pass, as he is just a teenager, and is part of the future of this team. With that said, I would like to think that Rutherford will pursue Antropov – only if he can be signed longer term – not just a rental. I believe he can step in as a legit # 2 center and make the coaching aspect of setting lines much easier – hence not a continual carousel of wingers bouncing around on all lines. An added plus is that Antropov can play all forward positions. I believe the return would be great. This transaction can be achieved by giving picks (this is what Toronto wants). Yet we have other players (see Cullen, Walker, Kaberle) that can be traded to other teams to help replenish what we would give for Antropov. Am not an expert – just my opinion, but not a road I would take unless we are confident he can be signed. Most importantly – I think this would make us a better team.

by Hopeful Canes Fan on Jan 22, 2009 10:05 AM EST reply actions  

Paladin just blew my mind… slow down chief…

This team has never been one to make big moves at the deadline… the only exception being the 05-06 season… So I honestly do not expect them to do much or to give up much. I could see them trading Whitney or Walker for a couple younger players (not that I want that to happen) in a move that could be similar to the Stillman/Commodore for Corvo/eaves move… Or I could also see them trading away some younger (or not at all used in games) players like Eaves/Brookbank/Kaberle for a younger forward OR for a BIG BODY person who can decapitate everyone in his path…

But based on history w/ this team: I honestly don’t expect much in the way of a “What’s the Frequency Kenneth” (ala Dan Rather) move…

What we see is probably what we’ll get…

by Mateo on Jan 22, 2009 10:11 AM EST reply actions  

I know that Brookbank and Kaberle are not “younger” but they do fall in the category of “not at all used in games.”

So don’t go LordStanleyBlog on my a$$!!!!

by Mateo on Jan 22, 2009 10:13 AM EST reply actions  

Mateo,

I agree that JR probably won’t make any big moves…although, depending on how you look at it, that Stiller/Commie for Eaves/Corvo trade was fairly big. I don’t think Whitney and Walker are a possibility because, I believe ( I could be wrong), they both have no trades attached to their contracts. Also, nobody seems interested in Kaberle, most teams already have more “muscle” than we do so they wouldn’t need a Brookbank and Eaves, while playing marginally better than he had been, has not played up (not even close) to his potential. That doesn’t leave much room for JR to work with. Then again, maybe that’s because the choices he would have, are choices I’d rather not see him make (LaRose, Ruutu, Williams, Cullen, Seidenberg).

by Nik on Jan 22, 2009 11:46 AM EST reply actions  

It’s true that nobody seemed interested in Kaberle while he was on waivers. Howver (according to JR) the trouble they were running into was that no teams wanted to spend the money for his contract.

This issue becomes less of a problem at the trade deadline because on march 4th the Hurricanes would have already paid the majority of his sallary for this season. More teams may be interested in Kaberle at the trade deadline than there were in October/November due to the fact that they would only have to pay him for a couple of months… That could give him more “movability.”

by Mateo on Jan 22, 2009 12:07 PM EST reply actions  

Keep in mind Kaberle is under contract for next year as well for 2.2 million.

by Bubba on Jan 22, 2009 12:23 PM EST reply actions  

Don’t remind me …

by Cory on Jan 22, 2009 12:28 PM EST reply actions  

oh snap!

by Mateo on Jan 22, 2009 12:32 PM EST reply actions  

^^ Drop whatever pretense you have of getting something worth a crap and dump Kabs for a late round 2010 pick at the deadline. Freeing up the $2.2 million for next year is addition by subtraction, and Frank has done very little to warrant his spot on this team. I’d much rather see us go after some actual defensemen during the offseason to supplant Corvo, Pitkanen, and company.

Why is this a 50/50 question? It’s almost February, and we’re the 8th seed. We’re buyers! At least we should be; we all know how tight JR can be when we aren’t running away with things (a la this point in 2006). Of those on that list, Tkachuk and Guerin would seem to be rent a players, which, although risky, would give us some much need oomph on the wings. A 2nd rounder in the upcoming draft doesn’t seem too much to pay for a chance at getting deeper in the post-season, assuming we get there.

I’ve always liked Steve Sullivan. Imagine plugging him in on the third line with Larose and Walker. Talk about a rough, hard working trio. Add another move to shore up on D and we could be talking about winning the division.

Remember, we still have a lot of hockey to be played. If we can make a move or two to wake up that dressing room, we could be at worst sitting in the #4-5 seeds come April. This team has enough front-line talent…if they would just snap out of the Maurice-induced offensive boredom and start shooting the damn puck!

by Thomas on Jan 23, 2009 2:17 PM EST reply actions  

We SHOULD be buyers…. but we won’t be….

I thought Kabs was playing great until he got injured….

And that’s been his problem since the Stanley Cup season.

by Mateo on Jan 24, 2009 12:34 PM EST reply actions  

Only in the NHL would the Hurricanes be considered in 8th place. In every other sport, they would be in 9th. Florida, in 9th, has more points per game, which in every other scoring system would have them ahead. The NHL is horrible at math.
Problem is when the coaches and reporters don’t realize how bad the math is. This has cost the Canes the last 2 years. They played casually because they were in a playoff spot, as opposed to the eagerness they should have had as they were actually on the outside looking in.

by Bake on Jan 25, 2009 6:27 PM EST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Canes Country, a hockey blog, information hub, and community center for fans of the Carolina Hurricanes.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Small
Call Columbus
Tuomo_twitter_profile_small
Tuomo Ruutu Injured; Expected to Miss Three Weeks
Jeff-eric_small
A little Mo/Kirk Comparison
Ring1_small
My Favorite Picture
Ring1_small
Chad LaRose: A Look At the "Chuck Norris" of Canes Hockey
Small
Looking past the trade deadline. March scheduling.
Statler-and-waldorf02_small
Time for Youngsters to Step Up
Neck_small
Trade Deadline Expectations...
Small
How to Fit Parise and Skinner In to the Budget
297235_228875923843877_197693266962143_697284_1857293148_n_small
Defending the Blue Line Needs Your Vote

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Hockey and Local Twitter

Carolina Hurricanes Roster

# Pos. DOB W H
Bryan Allen 5 D 8/21/1980 226 6-5
Brian Boucher 33 G 1/2/1977 200 6-2
Drayson Bowman 21 C 3/8/1989 190 6-1
Tim Brent 37 C 3/10/1984 188 6-0
Patrick Dwyer 39 RW 6/22/1983 175 5-11
Justin Faulk 28 D 3/20/1992 205 6-0
Tim Gleason 6 D 1/29/1983 217 6-0
Jay Harrison 44 D 11/3/1982 211 6-4
Jussi Jokinen 36 LW 4/1/1983 198 5-11
Derek Joslin 27 D 3/17/1987 210 6-1
Chad LaRose 59 LW 3/27/1982 181 5-10
Jamie McBain 4 D 2/25/1988 200 6-2
Andreas Nodl 14 RW 2/28/1987 196 6-1
Justin Peters 60 G 8/30/1986 205 6-1
Joni Pitkanen 25 D 9/19/1983 210 6-3
Tuomo Ruutu 15 LW 2/16/1983 200 6-0
Jerome Samson 71 RW 9/4/1987 195 6-0
Jeff Skinner 53 RW 5/16/1992 193 5-11
Jaroslav Spacek 8 D 2/11/1974 210 6-0
Eric Staal 12 C 10/29/1984 205 6-4
Anthony Stewart 13 C 1/5/1985 230 6-3
Brandon Sutter 16 C 2/14/1989 183 6-3
Jiri Tlusty 19 C 3/16/1988 209 6-0
Cam Ward 30 G 2/29/1984 185 6-1

More great SB Nation Blogs

Tags


Managing Editor

Cc_shieldjpg_small Bob Wage

Editors

Cc_cory_small Cory Lavalette

95e2a02d-007c-4379-a43d-8331eb2e0d40_small Brian LeBlanc

Contributors

Tuomo_twitter_profile_small Jamie Kellner

75120_1305100992932_1392720706_31336970_7465882_n_small C. Wilson Spiers

293608_10150264887072045_612857044_7969003_540721_n_small Lee Phillips