Will Eric Staal Make Team Canada's Roster?
The Canadian Olympic Team will be announced on Wednesday and fans might be asking themselves, will Carolina Hurricanes franchise player Eric Staal make the cut?
While Staal was tendered a cherished invitation to the country's Olympic Camp tryouts over the summer, many seem to think that the All Star center has not had an Olympic quality season so far this year. A 15 member panel from Hockey Night in Canada recently made their predictions, and Staal was not on the list.
Not surprisingly, they chose Martin Brodeur, Roberto Luongo, and Marc-Andre Fleury to be the goaltenders for the team. Hurricanes goalie Cam Ward was in consideration early in the season, but his numbers do not even come close to the competition at this point.
The word on the street is that the selection process weighs heavily upon a player's year-to-date production, and not necessarily what they have done in the past. If so, Staal is in as much trouble as his teammate.
I have assembled some year-to-date stats (as of 12/26) comprised of all 25 forwards attending the try out camp during the summer. (Joe Sakic is not included because of his retirement). I also included Brad Richards (3) and Dustin Penner (11) who have numbers that can not be ignored. They could very well make the team even though they were not invited to the camp, although that would be unusual.
| Points | ||||||
| Points | GP | per Game | ||||
| 1 | Joe Thornton | 10G 41A | 51 | 37 | 1.38 | |
| 2 | Sidney Crosby | 22G 24A | 46 | 37 | 1.24 | |
| 3 | Brad Richards | 10G 32A | 42 | 35 | 1.20 | |
| 4 | Dany Heatley | 22G 19A | 41 | 37 | 1.11 | |
| 5 | Martin St. Louis | 7G 34A | 41 | 37 | 1.11 | |
| 6 | Ryan Getzlaf | 10G 31A | 41 | 37 | 1.11 | |
| 7 | Corey Perry | 16G 24A | 40 | 37 | 1.08 | |
| 8 | Patrick Marleau | 23G 16A | 39 | 37 | 1.05 | |
| 9 | Ryan Smyth | 9G 14A | 23 | 22 | 1.05 | |
| 10 | Jarome Iginla | 19G 18A | 37 | 36 | 1.03 | |
| 11 | Dustin Penner | 19G 19A | 38 | 37 | 1.03 | |
| 12 | Rick Nash | 19G 17A | 36 | 38 | 0.95 | |
| 13 | Vincent Lecavalier | 9G 24A | 33 | 37 | 0.89 | |
| 14 | Mike Richards | 15G 15A | 30 | 36 | 0.83 | |
| 15 | Derek Roy | 9G 20A | 29 | 36 | 0.81 | |
| 16 | Jonathan Toews | 11G 13A | 24 | 30 | 0.80 | |
| 17 | Jeff Carter | 12G 15A | 27 | 36 | 0.75 | |
| 18 | Patrick Sharp | 11G 16A | 27 | 36 | 0.75 | |
| 19 | Eric Staal | 6G 15A | 21 | 28 | 0.75 | |
| 20 | Simon Gagne | 2G 6A | 8 | 12 | 0.67 | |
| 21 | Brenden Morrow | 13G 11A | 24 | 37 | 0.65 | |
| 22 | Shane Doan | 9G 15A | 24 | 38 | 0.63 | |
| 23 | Jordan Staal | 10G 13A | 23 | 38 | 0.61 | |
| 24 | Andy McDonald | 9G 1A | 20 | 34 | 0.59 | |
| 25 | Dan Cleary | 7G 9A | 16 | 30 | 0.53 | |
| 26 | Milan Lucic | 2G 3A | 5 | 10 | 0.50 | |
You can see that Staal is currently ranked 19th on the listing above, when compared in a "points per game" analysis. Last Olympics, the team took 13 forwards and had two on the "taxi squad", for emergency replacements. Coincidentally, Staal was a member of the extras in 2006.
Of course, how many "points per game" a player gets is not the only determining factor when choosing a team, but it would make sense that those numbers will be looked at very closely.
The wild card in all of this is how Steve Yzerman and the Olympic Committee take injuries into consideration. Staal has averaged over a point a game since his return from a 10 game break due to an injury, (16 points in 15 games). Those recent results would put him in the top 10 or 11 forwards listed above.
Also, Staal has performed well in pressure situations and led his team in scoring during two long post season runs. Is that taken into consideration?
The panel predicted that the following forwards would be selected: Crosby, Iginla, Thornton, Getzlaf, Nash, Heatley, Perry, Marleau, M. Richards, Toews, B. Richards, St. Louis, and Morrow. Staal was just on the outside, meaning that if the panel predicted correctly, he would be a substitute once again.
Will Staal make it? Should he accept if he is offered? The forward has been fighting injuries all season long and some fans might think that under those circumstances, he should respectively decline and rest himself for the home stretch, meaningless as it might be. What do you think?
25 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Hi Bob, Hope your Christmas was good!! on phone so will be brief; nothing on the record but in fact have been told opposite RE: experience vs currently hot. Hearing that esp b/c of even higher pressure than usual – home turf, poor showing in ‘06 etc – very reluctant to ice inexperienced group, even if it means leaving off some strong players currently having good seasons. Who knows but at any rate have been told those not having best seasons but w/ experience in p/o’s, int’l tourneys, still have edge. Guess we’ll soon find out!! Am making effort to visit more frequently, definitely miss the blog!! Fantastic as always :) take care, Sunny
Yzerman would be making a poor decision if he picked Staal. Staal’s play has been sub-par so far this season. On the other hand, Staal does have experience in high-pressure playoff situations that may be similar to what Canada will face in the Olympics. Eh, he should be an extra.
what part of
“missed multiple games due to injury” is so hard to comprehend?
by DidJussiThat? on Dec 28, 2009 9:50 AM EST up reply actions
They may pick him….. but I really really wish he would stay home in Raleigh and heal….
Not that it matters….
on second thought…. maybe he should play for his country and not worry about being 100% for the Hurricanes…. it’s not like the ’Canes are going anywhere…. and team Canada has a legitimate shot to win the gold….
I say go for it…..
by Mateos_Canes_Lamp on Dec 28, 2009 10:36 AM EST reply actions
Pretty much how I feel at this point.
If the Canes were still in the mix, and Staal wasn’t 100% I would be hoping he doesn’t get picked. As it is, I hope he gets the chance to win gold for his country. This opportunity doesn’t come around every year.
by Iggy Reilly on Dec 28, 2009 10:51 AM EST up reply actions
If he is as injured.....
….as all the apologist and the Organization keeps making him out to be he should not play in the Olympics, nor should he continue to play this year at all. This is a lost year, its over. Shut him down and let him get better if its so bad. The worst that could come from that is that we lose a few games and get closer to picking first.
it always burns within
the downward spiral never ends
when driven into sin
your salvation's found in a sinner's deed
by Douchebag St John on Dec 28, 2009 2:49 PM EST up reply actions
I think we will lose more games regardless….
by Mateos_Canes_Lamp on Dec 28, 2009 3:02 PM EST up reply actions
Eric better make the team!
Past years of exceptional play alone should have him in the line up. This year has been some what disapointing for Staal and his TRUE fans but again and again he’s proved to be a top player. Even though he is injuried right now it really doesn’t matter if he prolongs his injury in the olympics because we all know this season is done anyway. If your a true CANIAC how can you not want Staal there or even think he doesn’t deserve it. I could right a book about why he should be picked but I’ll leave that to A.Dog.
A TRUE CANIAC......YES I AM........
by canescup on Dec 28, 2009 10:53 AM EST via mobile reply actions
The team may bring him down
Staal’s been working very hard since returning from injury and if people couldn’t see vs. Philly they’re not going to.
Honestly, after Thorton and Sid, there isn’t a Canadian center significantly more skilled than Staal. There definately aren’t many as experienced and well-rounded, IMO. I would definately pick him ahead of Richards and Lecav. The only center after Thor and Sid I might pick ahead of Staal is perhaps Getzlaf.
But the way the Canes have been performing as a team could bring his value down. He’s considered a team leader and our team blows chunks.
I'm of Two Minds about Staal adn the Olympics
I think in the end if I were responsible for picking the Canadian Olympic team, I’d pick Staal. He has shown himself to be a winner at every level. He is experienced in playoffs and excels under pressure. He’s obviously not 100% now; but in the end, I think one bets on the horse and not the race track. Winners have one thing in common, they know how to win big games.
I can make another compelling argument that given how poorly Staal started out and his nagging injuries, he has not been one of the top ten forwards over the course of the NHL season to date. We are not seeing Staal at his best right now.
All in all, I would select Staal because he has proven himself when everything is on the line. I would also feel that Staal is competitive enough that he will bring out his best when he is playing with the best players and when he is playing for a Gold Medal. He has a history of being a warrior in the biggest games. I’d say, Staal, go get your Country and your team a gold medal.
Over 100 votes for him not deserving to be on the olympic team.......
I’m assuming these votes come from people who do not watch hockey or understand it. The olympics come around every four years, this team should be based on years past and present play. Take away this year (because of injuries) what more can you ask of a player in the last few years. I lose respect from fans (so they call themselves) that would think this way about Staal.
Thank you Staal for beating the Devils last year in game seven, I’m truly sorry for fans thinking you are not worthy, because you are.
A TRUE CANIAC......YES I AM........
Have you watched Staal play this season?
by Mateos_Canes_Lamp on Dec 28, 2009 3:02 PM EST up reply actions
I can’t speak for everyone, but this quote probably has something to do with voting:
The word on the street is that the selection process weighs heavily upon a player’s year-to-date production, and not necessarily what they have done in the past.
If it’s based on year to date, then he doesn’t really merit a roster spot (neither does Ward). If it’s based on what he’s done from the end of the Olympics 4 years ago to now, then that’s a different story.
"This guy is as meat and potatoes as there is of a man."
Gleason for Emperor!
Maybe that statement is what voters are looking at, but I’m not agreeing with it. I saw an interview with Babcock and he said the team will be pick ALOT on experience and skill they bring to the table. He also said they look at players who handle big game situations. Staal easily meets both of those req. Looking solely at this years stats I can see he’s not performing at the level we know he can.
A TRUE CANIAC......YES I AM........
I didn’t see the interview, but if that’s what Babcock said then perhaps Staal has a better chance then he’s being given credit for. But if it comes down to picking Staal at 75% (or whatever he is at the time) and someone else with a similar resume at 100%, I really can’t blame Yzerman et. al for going with the other guy.
"This guy is as meat and potatoes as there is of a man."
Gleason for Emperor!
Will, doesn't deserve
I’m one of the votes that doesn’t think he deserves it, but also thinks he will squeak onto the team.
This is, bottom line, a Canadian thing. Best sample of Canadian second-guessing hockey-think can be found on HNIC, which I watch each and every week. Hype can carry a player a long way there, and the “golden boy” aura that’s beginning to wear a bit thin in Raleigh is still glowing in Canada.
However, even there, opinions are split on him. He didn’t make every talking head’s list. Interestingly, Jordan made more lists than Eric did.
It’s not an All-Star game. There’s NO recognition for the past, other than in the “experience” column. It’s ALL about winning the gold medal for this bunch, and nothing less.
And, although Staal’s season has been unspectacular and he’s iffy physically for the games, I think his hype may make him impossible to not pick and they’ll just let the coaching staff figure out how to use him.
If I were picking, I know too much about him, so think it’s “undeserved”. But, on the other hand, my money says he will be picked.























