Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Dan Marino Starting College For Developmentally Disabled

Tidbits - Canes Vs. Devils

This will be the fifth time the Hurricanes have been to the playoffs since moving to Carolina, with the previous years being 1999, 2001, 2002 and 2006. Take away their first postseason (which ended in Round 1 against Boston) and the Canes have faced the New Jersey Devils each time. 

Outside of Carolina's 2006 Stanley Cup season, when they met in the second round, the Devils and Hurricanes have met in the Eastern Conference quarterfinals. 

So we're on a familiar path, even if most of the faces of changed. But rather than look at the past, we're going to take a voyage through this year's statistics and compare and contrast the first-round foes.

Star-divide

Let's start with some basic team statistics.

Power Play

 

  • New Jersey: 15th overall (18.9), 15th home (18.2), T-10th road (19.6)
  • Carolina: 18th overall (18.7), 17th home (17.9), T-10th road (19.6)

Penalty Kill

 

  • New Jersey: 20th overall (79.9), 26th home (78.0), 11th road (81.8)
  • Carolina: 19th overall (80.4), T-16th home (80.8), T-18th road (80.0)

Assessment: With the exception of Carolina's penalty killing, both teams have been better on the road in special teams situations. Chances are, one team will need to elevate their play at home to take an advantage in the series.

Goals For And Against By Period: 1st-2nd-3rd-OT-Overall

 

  • New Jersey: Goals For 69-87-73-9-238; Goals Against 57-74-74-2-207
  • Carolina: 69-86-74-7-236; Goals Against 67-80-72-2-221
  • Assessment: What a staggering similarity in goals for. The teams had the same number of regulation goals (229) and the period-by-period breakdown is nearly identical. But New Jersey is New Jersey, and their goals against is always near the bottom of the league (fourth this year). For their part, the Hurricanes turned around their defensive play with the hiring of Paul Maurice and finished eighth.

 

Various team tidbits

 

  • New Jersey and Carolina rank first and second, respectively, in winning one-goal games. The Devils finished 25-5-4 (.735) while the Canes were 24-8-7 (.615). New Jersey was also tied for the league lead in three-goal wins (18).
  • The Devils have a league-best .694 winning percentage when outshooting their opponent (34-15-0) while Carolina ranked 16th (27-20-5, .519). On the flip side, Carolina has a 17-9-2 record (.607, 5th) when outshot, and New Jersey was 11th (16-11-3, .533).
  • New Jersey won .951 of the games they led after two periods, second to only Anaheim. Carolina won the third-most games when trailing after two (8-21-3, .250). The Devils also went 37-5-2 (.841) of the games in which they scored first, best in the league. Carolina was third in winning games in which they allowed the first goal (20-20-3, .465).
  • As we've documented before, the Canes are the league's least penalized team, spending just 9.8 minutes in the box per game. New Jersey ranks ninth with 12.9 PIMs per game. Part of that can be attributed to a difference in major (see fighting) penalites. Carolina had just 26 (second-fewest in the NHL), less than half of New Jersey's total (58, T-22nd). That could even things out since fighting is always down in the playoffs.
  • Carolina and New Jersey each won 51.3 percent of their faceoffs this season (T-eighth).

Assessment: The Devils are at their best when they get ahead — they always have been. That being said, Carolina has been very good at orchestrating comeback wins this year. With the special teams battle so close, the Hurricanes' tendency to take fewer penalties than their opponents — and draw more, too: 201 PP opportunities (second) to New Jersey's 159 (T-27th) — could tip the scale in their favor.

Player Tidbits

  • Zach Parise's breakthrough season has him getting some fringe consideration for the Hart Trophy. He finished fifth in league scoring (94 points), third in goals (45), eighth in plus/minus (plus-30) and third in shots (364) — all in just 18:45 of ice time. Parise had three overtime winners this year, tied with Philly's Jeff Carter for the league lead.
  • Eric Staal is Parise's closest contender in accolades. His 40 goals ranked him tied for fifth in the league and his 75 points ranked 25th. His 372 shots were second to only Alex Ovechkin (528 ... crazy). Staal is also tied for fifth in the league in first goals.
  • Both Staal and Parise had 14 power-play goals, tied for eighth in the NHL. Both are also among the league leaders in road goals. Parise was tied for first with Columbus' Rich Nash and Buffalo's Thomas Vanek with 23, while Staal was one behind with 22. The Canes' Tuomo Ruutu was tied for 20th in the league with 17 road tallies. While Parise did his scoring on the road, he did his passing at home, finishing fourth in the league in home assists with 36.
  • Patrick Elias has 31 goals (T-27th) and 47 assists (T-26th) for 78 points (T-20th). 
  • Ray Whitney led the Canes in scoring with 77 points (T-22nd) and 53 assists (12th). His 30 even-strength assists ranked tied for 20th. His 23 power play assists were tied for 19th.
  • Brian Gionta had 31 even-strength assists, tied for 18th in the NHL. Parise also had 30, tied with Whitney, while Jamie Lagenbrunner and Travis Zajac each had 29.
  • Ruutu was 10th in the NHL in hits with 228. 
  • Trade-deadline acquisition Niclas Havelid finished sixth in the NHL in blocked shots with 190. Carolina's Dennis Seidenberg was 17th with 160, while the Devils' Bryce Salvador was 26th with 147.
  • Zajac finished plus-33, fourth in the NHL. At plus-25, Lagenbrunner was tied for 10th. 
  • With two goals in the season finale against the Devils, Anton Babchuk finished tied for fifth in goals by defensemen with 16. Joe Corvo was tied for 11th with 14.
  • Four New Jersey defensemen were in the top 16 in plus/minus among blueliners. Mike Mottau (plus-24, fifth), Johnny Oduya and Paul Martin (plus-21, T-11th) and Colin White (plus-18, 16th). Babchuk was Carolina's best at plus-13, tied for 26th.
  • Corvo had 22 power play points this season, tied for 20th among d-men.
  • New Jersey's David Clarkson ranked 10th in PIMs with 164 and Michael Rupp was tied for 27th with 136.
  • Rod Brind'Amour finished as the NHL's top faceoff man, finishing at 61.0 percent. Zajac was the Devils' top guy at 53.1 percent (23rd).
  • Havelid lead the NHL in power play goals allowed when on the ice with 47, though the vast majority of them game from his time with Atlanta. He was also tied for sixth in overall goals allowed when on the ice with 108. 

Assessment: Parise's been dominant all season, while Staal's numbers surged after the acquisition of Erik Cole. Whitney, Ruutu, Zajac, Elias and Lagenbrunner all provide solid secondary scoring, but Carolina's defense has a huge advantage in firepower. New Jersey's defense-first blueline doesn't make many mistakes.

Goalie Tidbits

 

  • With 39 wins, Cam Ward finished third in the NHL, behind Calgary's Miikka Kiprusoff (45) and San Jose's Evgeni Nabokov (41). Scott Clemmensen (25) was tied for 20th, while Martin Brodeur wound up tied for 29th (19 wins) despite playing just 31 games. Clemmensen finished tied for seventh in goals-against average (2.39) and tied for ninth is save percentage (.917) while Ward was tied for 12th in GAA (2.44) and tied for 11th in save percentage (.916). Brodeur, who didn't play enough to qualify, finished with a .916 save percentage and 2.41 GAA.
  • Ward's six shutouts were tied for sixth, while Brodeur had five and Clemmensen had a pair.
  • Brodeur had an .848 save percentage when facing a power play, tied for 60th in the NHL. Ward and Clemmensen finished at .871 (T-35th).

Assessment: You can never discount Brodeur, but Ward has had a career year and is a proven playoff goalie, like his idol in the opposing net. This could be the year Brodeur proves less wear and tear does him well during the playoffs, or show that maybe the luster has simply come off on his postseason credentials. Perhaps no goalie in the league scares opponents quite like Ward can right now (perhaps Roberto Luongo). His dominant play over the second half coupled with his magical 2006 playoff run as a rookie surely has opposing coaches looking for a weakness (like Brodeur's stick side, low).

 

 

 

Comment 11 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

STICK SIDE LOW!

STICK SIDE LOW

by chrisj on Apr 13, 2009 10:42 AM EDT reply actions  

Thank You.

Nice comparison. The only thing you didn’t really talk about too much was the way each team has played going into the playoffs. In my mind, this Canes team is not the same team that compliled much of those numbers in the first half. New Jersey played their best hockey in the middle of the season. As long as the Canes didn’t expend too much energy getting in,,,,,,,,advantage to the hot team… Carolina.

by KenRab on Apr 13, 2009 10:50 AM EDT reply actions  

Cory and I will be getting more into this later today and tomorrow.

GM of CanesCountry.com

by Bob Wage on Apr 13, 2009 11:36 AM EDT reply actions  

Boards

Not to say there was anything malicious about it other than just quirky bounces, but given what happened Saturday do you think there would be any consideration by the NHL to check the boards behind the nets prior to the games at The Rock to make sure there is nothing out of whack?

by hotchipsnsalsa on Apr 13, 2009 12:42 PM EDT reply actions  

Probably not…. Every arena has creases in their glass and boards… I’ve seen the same thing happen to visiting teams (and to our team) at the RBC Center….

Like bad offside calls… it’s just part of hockey….

by Mateos_Canes_Lamp on Apr 13, 2009 1:09 PM EDT up reply actions  

Imagine if that was a game 7 and the boards had not been checked.

Once in a blue moon ………understandable. Twice in a period……….hhhhmmmm.

It’s not part of the game if the “grounds crew” has screwed with the boards or just not “fixed” a problem that gives one team an advantage. It would be like sending scuffed balls to your home town pitcher or having someone shine a lazor light in your opponent’s face while he is hitting.

The NHL should check the boards at every game to look for any problems. Throw a puck around the boards to be sure all is on the up and up. The same way they check the nets to be sure there are no holes. Saying that they should not check the boards is like saying don’t check the nets or the Goalie’s equipment. They should check the sticks too. Let it be fair. A test of skill and will not bounces and boobs.

With all the millions on the line with each game and each goal, why not take 5 minutes to be sure the boards are not “tweaked” If anyone out there thinks teams would not do that, just ask the any major league club that played the peaking Twins of the early 80’s. Or Mark “I only want to talk about the future” McGwire. What about Sean Avery in front of Brodeur. That was not a rule but they changed it in fast order. This is similar. I guarantee any ice crew can “fix” the boards to get that bounce.

Finally, I will say this, The Devils were certainly going hard to the net on both of those plays……really hard. Again,,,,,,,,,,,hhhhmmmmm

by KenRab on Apr 13, 2009 4:46 PM EDT reply actions  

I dunno … you’d have to hit the spots exactly right. If it was possible to create a bounce, I’m sure Carolina would notice leading up to Game 1 and do the same when NJ is defending that end of the ice.

And NJ always goes hard to the net.

CanesCountry.com: An Eye On Carolina Hockey

by Cory Lavalette on Apr 13, 2009 6:49 PM EDT reply actions  

It would be interesting to try this a few times to see if it can be duplicated. I believe it can.

by KenRab on Apr 14, 2009 4:36 PM EDT reply actions  

Just stay in the CREASE should of learn something from the first bouce. But twice, blame #2 bounce on the goalie and without that we would of won. Thanks for nothing #2 goalie.

by canescup on Apr 14, 2009 5:09 PM EDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Canes Country, a hockey blog, information hub, and community center for fans of the Carolina Hurricanes.

Hockey and Local Twitter

Carolina Hurricanes Roster

# Pos. DOB W H
Bryan Allen 5 D 8/21/1980 226 6-5
Brian Boucher 33 G 1/2/1977 200 6-2
Drayson Bowman 21 C 3/8/1989 190 6-1
Tim Brent 37 C 3/10/1984 188 6-0
Patrick Dwyer 39 RW 6/22/1983 175 5-11
Justin Faulk 28 D 3/20/1992 205 6-0
Tim Gleason 6 D 1/29/1983 217 6-0
Jay Harrison 44 D 11/3/1982 211 6-4
Jussi Jokinen 36 LW 4/1/1983 198 5-11
Derek Joslin 27 D 3/17/1987 210 6-1
Chad LaRose 59 LW 3/27/1982 181 5-10
Jamie McBain 4 D 2/25/1988 200 6-2
Andreas Nodl 14 RW 2/28/1987 196 6-1
Justin Peters 60 G 8/30/1986 205 6-1
Joni Pitkanen 25 D 9/19/1983 210 6-3
Tuomo Ruutu 15 LW 2/16/1983 200 6-0
Jeff Skinner 53 RW 5/16/1992 193 5-11
Jaroslav Spacek 8 D 2/11/1974 210 6-0
Eric Staal 12 C 10/29/1984 205 6-4
Anthony Stewart 13 C 1/5/1985 230 6-3
Brandon Sutter 16 C 2/14/1989 183 6-3
Jiri Tlusty 19 C 3/16/1988 209 6-0
Cam Ward 30 G 2/29/1984 185 6-1

More great SB Nation Blogs

Tags


Managing Editor

Cc_shieldjpg_small Bob Wage

Editors

Cc_cory_small Cory Lavalette

Under_dawgs_jpeg_small Carolyn Christians

95e2a02d-007c-4379-a43d-8331eb2e0d40_small Brian LeBlanc

Contributors

Tuomo_twitter_profile_small Jamie Kellner

75120_1305100992932_1392720706_31336970_7465882_n_small C. Wilson Spiers

293608_10150264887072045_612857044_7969003_540721_n_small Lee Phillips