Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Notre Dame's Turnaround: How Have The Irish Done It?

Canes Country Exit Analysis: Eric Staal

You old-schoolers out there probably remember the old James Brown routine where near the end of his show where he would feign exhaustion and collapse to the stage. This was always followed by a member of his entourage stepping up to wrap a cape around The Godfather’s shoulders with the intent to escort him off the stage. Then after a few steps, Brown would dramatically throw off the cape and re-take the stage with renewed vigor hollering. ...."Is it gonna be hot in the hot tub!?" Wait that was Eddie Murphy.

Star-divide

In Game Seven of the Devils series, the image of Staal leaping over the rail, hitting Warp Factor 8 in two strides, and then burying the puck past Martin Brodeur’s right shoulder to close out the Devils in Game 7 sticks in my mind as high drama befitting a old James Brown show at the Apollo.

How many times when the Canes were down did you hear the Barry Melrose’s’ of the hockey world say, "Now is the time when Eric Staal needs to step up."  You heard it after a lousy Game One loss to the Devils. And you heard it after Staal was tossed about like a rag doll in Game One of the Bruins series by Zdeno Chara.  You heard it when the Canes let the Bruins back into the series. Each time, Staal answered the bell.

The Good:  When the Canes selected Eric Staal with the second pick in the 2003 draft, some skeptics postulated that while Staal might emerge as a nice play-maker, but that he probably wouldn’t bring the physicality of Nathan Horton or the finishing skills of Nikolai Zherdev.  Think again pundits. Eric Staal, v2009, leads by example, brings the speed and acceleration of a more compact player, and demonstrates physicality on and in pursuit of the puck (he’s very Staal-like in that regard). He also has the icy finishing skills of Delta Force sniper.  

Just a side note stat: Four of the eight players who scored 40 goals or more in the regular season were 2003 draftees (Carter, Parise, Staal and Vanek). You’ll have to dig deep to find Zherdev or Horton.

The Bad: Now I’m struggling a bit. The only thing I can say is that there are nights when he just isn’t am uber- dominant presence. He’s no Joe Thornton in that regard, but when Eric is off, the Canes et al tend to funk out. He’s highly paid and enjoys celebrity status in the league, and he deserves it. Staal’s still a bit of a liability in the faceoff circle. Not the flailing fish he once was, but there’s still room for improvement.

The Drama? The decline of Rod Brind ‘Amour’s game, coupled with Jim Rutherford’s statement that Rod will need to compete for a spot on next season’s roster, might be an indication of some pending clubhouse drama. How Eric comports himself will be very important.  He has to continue to lead by example while it all plays out.

The Stats: While Eric’s season point totals the past few seasons haven’t approached those he posted during the ’05-’06 Stanley Cup winning season, his 75 points this season and his top-five finish with 40 goals – eight of them game winners - bear witness to his emergence as a dominant player in this league.  He and his line draw the best defensive pairings every shift, every night. Despite this nightly grind, Staal remained near the top in playoff points until the Canes hit a wall against the Penguins in the conference finals.  

Here are some highlights for all you statisticalists.

·         Iron Man – Top ten in games (82), goals (40), power point goals (14) and game winning goals (8)

·         Playoff Stud  - Still among the top ten in 2009 playoff stats for goals (10), points (15) and power point goals (3).

·         26 Shifts per game – Go-to-guy in every situation

Staalsy Franchise: Eric made $5 million this season with a cap hit of $4.5 million. He’ll make more in each of the coming four seasons and is locked-up thru 2013. Coast to coast and station to station, Eric Staal is the face and future of the Hurricanes franchise... When asked to comment on this analysis of his just completed season, Staal responded, "I feel good! Heh! "

Poll
How would you grade Eric Staal's 2008-2009 season?
A
84 votes
B
152 votes
C
27 votes
D
1 votes
F
3 votes
Participation Trophy
4 votes

271 votes | Poll has closed

Comment 30 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

He’s actually signed through 2016. Eric gets a ‘B’ from me. He stepped up when it counted and had a great season, but still needs to find a way to be more consistent. There were too many stretches where he did a disappearing act, but the re-arrival of Mo seemed to help his game.

-Jonathan Hawkins
My Site | My Flickr

by DaleCooper on Jun 7, 2009 7:20 PM EDT reply actions  

That was good…lol

GM of CanesCountry.com

by Bob Wage on Jun 7, 2009 10:46 PM EDT up reply actions  

Nice

Great add LTD. Didn’t know that one was out there. It’s getting harder to find classic SNL skits on youtube.

by Scott Cason on Jun 7, 2009 11:34 PM EDT up reply actions  

Subliminal Shilling

I think I meant to write that he really (Microsoft Office) Excel’d on the power play. At least that’s my (MIcrosoft Office) Outlook….(MIcrosoft Office) Word.

by Scott Cason on Jun 8, 2009 10:33 AM EDT up reply actions  

Yeah, I found that one back and saved it as a favorite LOL.

Back to Staal, I gave him a B+. B for all the reasons you described, the plus for being such an ironman and for stepping up in the playoffs. He’ll get an ‘A’ from me when he can figure out the faceoff circle!

by Jamie Kellner on Jun 8, 2009 8:34 AM EDT up reply actions  

Hard to argue with a 75 point season… when he’s on he’s on and when he’s not, well, he’s invisible. I still believe he was battling a shoulder injury for the majority of the season.

by jenniwa30 on Jun 7, 2009 9:10 PM EDT reply actions  

Staal's Season

I also think that Staal battled a shoulder thing for much of the first half of the season. With Roddy not himself, and Cullen not himself till later in the season, then broke his foot, Staal faces the best the other team has night in and night out. Is there another elite player that faces this much pressure without the support of other players in the league…Ovie has Semin and Green to help carry the offensive burden. Rick Nash in Columbus is the only other star player the shoulders this much burden on a nightly basis without the benefit of another elite point producer. I may be way off with my comments, if i am let me know.
Overall, Staal had an above average season, the only glaring weakness in his game is in the faceoff circle. Luckily, this skill can be developed. You cannot develop a goal scorer’s touch, though that touch may ebb and flow due to confidence. Staal absolutely needs a playmaker on his left wing, allowing Whitney to role with Cullen on the second line. Cole or Ruutu can create havoc on the right side, the other slides down to second line.
Staal may never again have a 100 point season, and I am fine with that. He seems to one of those players that gets stronger as the season goes on. A lot of players have had there best seasons early in their careers. Staal, like the rest of the Canes, took the league by surprise in 2006. Now he is the focus of every teams game plan. A lot of people compare Staal’s game to Francis, but I see a ton of Sakic in his game. Staal may never get the credit he deserves in the league with players like Malkin, Crosby, and Ovie playing during the same time. Seems that Francis never got the credit he deserved due to playing at the same time as Gretsky, Mario, Stevie Y, et all.

by SouthernHockeyFan on Jun 8, 2009 8:41 AM EDT reply actions  

It's About Leadership!

I don’t think that there’s any question that Staal is a natural scorer whose skills have improved and will continue to improve with experience. What the Hurricanes needed at the end, though, was leadership, and Staal didn’t even make the Short List there. With Brindy sliding, it’s going to be even more critical in coming seasons that the Hurricanes have a Captain who can pull the team up to their full potential. Staal didn’t have what was needed when Brind’amour was out for surgery, and he didn’t have it against the Penguins. It wasn’t just that the Pens outplayed the ’Canes consistently; the Devils and the Bruins outplayed the Hurricanes, too. But in the first two rounds, the team stayed in the game until the last period, and somehow found the little bit extra that it took to win.

In 2006, when the team started to slump, the Captain was there to motivate the team to do whatever it took, and they did! In round three this year, not only was there no apparent leadership, for most of the time, there was no team; just five men skating in loose formation.

Maybe that kind of leadership comes with experience, and Staal will step up to the challenge, and maybe not. He’s had two opportunities so far, and he’s come up short both times.

While I’m on a roll, what kind of slogan was, “Our team, our time”? It sounds like something out of a low-budget advertising campaign. Winning teams don’t claim the times, they make the times for themselves. The Hurricanes didn’t.

by GordonKeehn2 on Jun 8, 2009 9:41 AM EDT reply actions  

our team, our time

Kinda like the ‘nobody sits’ garbage they put up on the jumbotron during one of the games. I’ll stand the whole game if I damned well feel like it. If I don’t, I won’t and nothing they put on the jumbotron is going to make me. But the team sure can make me feel like standing…

by Andrea's evil twin on Jun 8, 2009 10:02 AM EDT up reply actions  

I find it amusing to hear people talk about leadership roles concerning players. How the heck do we know what happens off the ice or in the locker room? Sorry, but I don’t think we have enough inside information to make judgement calls like that. I have people read where folks qustion Rod’s leadership role and I have heard people say Gleason is a leader. Just because people talk to the media and use certain language doesn’t make them a great leader. As far as Staal he already commented he is not rah rah type of guy and that he has a different leadership role compared to Roddy. I really don’t know who is has the role to be a leader, but I don’t think we have too little information to be making judgement calls like this.

by hotchipsnsalsa on Jun 8, 2009 10:31 AM EDT up reply actions  

That's not fair...

No NHL team has EVER won another series after two seven-game wins. The whole team was physically and emotionally exhausted after going the distance and beating two teams that were superior, record-wise, in the regular season; that included the #1 team in the conference!

I don’t know what exactly Stall could have done better in your book, but I’d say we far exceeded expectations, both at the beginning of the season, at the halfway point, and even at the beginning of the playoffs.

Remember, kids...don't ever let facts get in the way of your argument.

by MichaelProcton on Jun 8, 2009 10:44 AM EDT up reply actions  

GordonK

It seems to me that you have been watching another player. When Brindy went down last season to knee injury Staal stepped up immediately. You could see it in his eyes and in his play. Remember Staal is only 24 and Roddy is headed to the HOF and widely considered on of the best leaders in the game. Roddy has also gone on record as saying it is hard to assume leadership of a team when the man wearing the “C” is so widely respected, ie Francis before retirement. How many player in the league, let alone the Canes, have played every single game for the 4 years? That is leadership. Watch the replay from the Devils series when Jussi scores with less than a minute left….Staal immediately looks to scoreboard to see time left…then takes shift, takes puck, wins game. Is that not leadership? I believe the Canes are in great hands going forward. Staal. Ward. Gleason. Ruutu. Hell even Rosie should be considered a leader with the way he plays night in, and night out. The Canes are only two players away from being an elite team for years to come.

by SouthernHockeyFan on Jun 8, 2009 11:44 AM EDT up reply actions  

B+

An impressive year but needs to get back to 100pt seasons. Now that we’ve seen what he’s capable of, I don’t want to be teased every year by 05-06. I know he’ll be harder pressed to score that much under Mo (vs. Lavi), but regardless…

In regards to Drama, although I’m nearly certain Roddy knows he’s years are waning Staal’s been good about knowing his place on the team and I’ve been impressed by that given his youth.

Swenksta is dead on about lead support. WTB playmaking winger.

About the only thing I didn’t agree with here is the C issue. Even if Staal can continue to be the wings of the team, I think Gleason is the aileron. I like TG’s outlook on the team’s play and I grow weary of Staal’s regurgitated professional speak (ex. “moving forward”). Gleason also seems a bit more outgoing by nature.

Oh, and someone misspelled “Stall”. I tell you, I adore auctioneers that do that on Ebay…

by Caniac1026 on Jun 8, 2009 11:37 AM EDT reply actions  

"Needs to get back to 100-point seasons?"

That would mark in the top ten in any season over the last ten years. Expecting that out of any player is ridiculous.

Remember, kids...don't ever let facts get in the way of your argument.

by MichaelProcton on Jun 8, 2009 1:37 PM EDT up reply actions  

Granted: I did unfairly make that sound like Staal used to be an annual 100 pt producer. However, I don’t think it’s a ridiculous expectation for a franchise center who has displayed that performance level in the past. Lofty, yes, but far from ridiculous.

by Caniac1026 on Jun 8, 2009 2:18 PM EDT up reply actions  

I dunno, I think 80+ minimum and a lot, LOT more visible on the ice.He has to be a force every night, if for some reason he doesn’t assist, let alone bury one, he better be keeping two guys busy chasing his expensive ass (and what of his "protoge’ Cole?) around. He is paid far too much to not be of some impact EVERY night and off the ice.

A

by Paladin6 on Jun 9, 2009 6:40 PM EDT up reply actions  

Clarification: Gleason COULD be the aileron. He’s taken a back seat in the leadership role I think to this point to his credit.

by Caniac1026 on Jun 8, 2009 11:39 AM EDT reply actions  

forgive my ignorance, but

What is an aileron?

Let's go Canes!
Hakkaa Paalle!

by Carolyn Christians on Jun 8, 2009 8:03 PM EDT up reply actions  

the part of the wing that controls the x-axis tilt...

i.e. he’d be the player that put us in the right direction.

Remember, kids...don't ever let facts get in the way of your argument.

by MichaelProcton on Jun 9, 2009 1:30 AM EDT up reply actions  

Aileron?

And that’s how Gleason rolls.

by Scott Cason on Jun 9, 2009 1:49 AM EDT up reply actions  

Puck Daddy does it again...

Guess Puck Daddy was starting to get that “jingle-jangle feeling” from not having Eric Staal to bash now that the Canes are out of the playoffs….he takes a swipe at our boys here for having the gall to give Staal a positive review for this past seasons play. What a jerk, were are the swipes at Ovechin for coughing up a 2-0 lead in the semis and not making it to the Conference Finals? Oh yeah, the thing about covering the Crapitals for a living. I know he and Canes Country have had an ongoing dialogue but really? Great blog, but I am beginning to hate Fluff Daddy

by SouthernHockeyFan on Jun 8, 2009 1:22 PM EDT reply actions  

I think it’s up to Scott to decide if he wants to offer a rebuttal to Puck Daddy’s quickie slam. At least Wysh could have mentioned James Brown while he was at it…

Let's go Canes!
Hakkaa Paalle!

by Carolyn Christians on Jun 8, 2009 8:06 PM EDT up reply actions  

I highly doubt that Staal ever hits 100 points again. Everyone’s stats were inflated in that first post-lockout season. He had his second-best season in terms of goals, only five away from that amazing 05-06 campaign. We’ve heard for years now about how Staal is a goal scorer and not a playmaker. You can’t ask for much more from a goal scorer than finishing top-10 in goals. A.

by nomadologist on Jun 8, 2009 4:34 PM EDT reply actions  

Eric Stall

While he had good nights and bad nights, It just seemed to me during the crucial games especially in the plaiyoffs He just wasn’t there when the team needed him, this is not to say he had to try and do it all by his self, on the contrary he could have had a little more support especially from player’s like Rod Brindenmor and Eric Cole they did nothing in the playoff games.Maybe next year== Rod should retire.

robert

by BOOBY on Jun 9, 2009 3:26 PM EDT reply actions  

Booby....

to paraphrase “Staal disappears when teams needs him the most”….you mean like game 7 against the Devils? Just a suggestion, might want to spend some time learning how to spell the player’s names.

by SouthernHockeyFan on Jun 9, 2009 3:43 PM EDT up reply actions  

he did get everyone of them wrong, didnt he?! lol

by packpigskinfan25 on Jun 10, 2009 11:52 AM EDT up reply actions  

Sorry, but a top 10 player in playoff scoring showed up plenty.

Remember, kids...don't ever let facts get in the way of your argument.

by MichaelProcton on Jun 9, 2009 7:41 PM EDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Canes Country, a hockey blog, information hub, and community center for fans of the Carolina Hurricanes.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Small
Call Columbus
Tuomo_twitter_profile_small
Tuomo Ruutu Injured; Expected to Miss Three Weeks
Jeff-eric_small
A little Mo/Kirk Comparison
Ring1_small
My Favorite Picture
Ring1_small
Chad LaRose: A Look At the "Chuck Norris" of Canes Hockey
Small
Looking past the trade deadline. March scheduling.
Statler-and-waldorf02_small
Time for Youngsters to Step Up
Neck_small
Trade Deadline Expectations...
Small
How to Fit Parise and Skinner In to the Budget
297235_228875923843877_197693266962143_697284_1857293148_n_small
Defending the Blue Line Needs Your Vote

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Hockey and Local Twitter

Carolina Hurricanes Roster

# Pos. DOB W H
Bryan Allen 5 D 8/21/1980 226 6-5
Brian Boucher 33 G 1/2/1977 200 6-2
Drayson Bowman 21 C 3/8/1989 190 6-1
Tim Brent 37 C 3/10/1984 188 6-0
Patrick Dwyer 39 RW 6/22/1983 175 5-11
Justin Faulk 28 D 3/20/1992 205 6-0
Tim Gleason 6 D 1/29/1983 217 6-0
Jay Harrison 44 D 11/3/1982 211 6-4
Jussi Jokinen 36 LW 4/1/1983 198 5-11
Derek Joslin 27 D 3/17/1987 210 6-1
Chad LaRose 59 LW 3/27/1982 181 5-10
Jamie McBain 4 D 2/25/1988 200 6-2
Andreas Nodl 14 RW 2/28/1987 196 6-1
Justin Peters 60 G 8/30/1986 205 6-1
Joni Pitkanen 25 D 9/19/1983 210 6-3
Tuomo Ruutu 15 LW 2/16/1983 200 6-0
Jerome Samson 71 RW 9/4/1987 195 6-0
Jeff Skinner 53 RW 5/16/1992 193 5-11
Jaroslav Spacek 8 D 2/11/1974 210 6-0
Eric Staal 12 C 10/29/1984 205 6-4
Anthony Stewart 13 C 1/5/1985 230 6-3
Brandon Sutter 16 C 2/14/1989 183 6-3
Jiri Tlusty 19 C 3/16/1988 209 6-0
Cam Ward 30 G 2/29/1984 185 6-1

More great SB Nation Blogs

Tags


Managing Editor

Cc_shieldjpg_small Bob Wage

Editors

Cc_cory_small Cory Lavalette

95e2a02d-007c-4379-a43d-8331eb2e0d40_small Brian LeBlanc

Contributors

Tuomo_twitter_profile_small Jamie Kellner

75120_1305100992932_1392720706_31336970_7465882_n_small C. Wilson Spiers

293608_10150264887072045_612857044_7969003_540721_n_small Lee Phillips