Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Jeremy Lin's Game-Winner Was Incredible, Worth Remembering

Anton Babchuk: Another Solid Year in the KHL

Could Anton Babchuk and his lethal shot return to Raleigh next season? (photo by LTD)

Ex-Carolina Hurricanes defenseman Anton Babchuk is having a very good season over in the KHL.  His statline is (46GP 9G 13A 22P +17) and he recently made the KHL All Star team, (and scored a goal in that contest). 

After having a career year last season in Carolina, (72GP 16G 19A 33P +15) he had a disappointing playoffs and left several fans with a sour taste in their mouths.  But those regular season stats do not look so bad right now and the team has missed his booming shot from the point. 

Last summer, the Hurricanes reportedly offered Babchuk a million dollar contract, but the youngtser felt he deserved more and ended up bolting to the KHL.  The good news is, he still is property of the Hurricanes and they could try to bring him back again next season, or trade him in the coming offseason. 

What do you think?  Should the Canes try to bring him back?

Star-divide

By the way, Canes Country will not be taking a break during the Olympic "shut down".   We have some very interesting interviews coming up which we will be publishing within the next few days.  Of course, we will also be keeping up with the current news and trending topics, as always.  Stay tuned.

Poll
Should the Hurricanes make a reasonable attempt to bring back Anton Babchuk next season?
Yes, he's a good prospect and could still improve
196 votes
No, he has a bad attitude. Let him stay in the KHL
41 votes
No, but try to trade his rights over the offseason
136 votes
Mixed feelings --- don't know
69 votes

442 votes | Poll has closed

Comment 180 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

hmm slow hockey day huh ?

i had to smile at the fact that 3 out of the 4 votes would want to see Anton back next season. By the way, does anyone knoiw just how much the KHL team he currently plays for is paying him ? And are they willing to give him a raise to keep him there ? that information would be a bonus for this article…no ? be safe,stay warm as it is rainy and sleting here in W/S…yuck !! and to add to my misery…i am torn between watching the rats play @ 5:00 pm or watching glenn beck…hmmm after further review…rats win !!

Relax !! Even Micro Wave Popcorn takes time !! Go Canes !!

by CaniacSteve on Feb 15, 2010 11:22 AM EST reply actions  

I don’t think his current KHL contract is that big a deal, honestly. JR won’t be upping his offer for a guy that has slighted him twice. If Anton comes back, it’ll be b/c he wants to be in the NHL and he’s willing to fulfill the rules of his contractual status. He’s an RFA — the only leverage he has is to stay overseas or to get a big offer sheet.

by Cory Lavalette on Feb 15, 2010 11:36 AM EST up reply actions  

  I think Jim Rutherford will offer a two year contract and will figure he can trade Babchuk ifhe needs to.

by abramsdoug on Feb 15, 2010 11:38 AM EST up reply actions  

I do not think that Anton Babchuck is an easy player to trade… They tried to trade him over the summer before he bolted for the K. I think everyone in the NHL has seen the attitude issues combined w/ the way he struggled in the playoffs last season… If he plays in the NHL it will likely be for the Carolina Hurricanes….

by Mateos_Canes_Lamp on Feb 15, 2010 11:41 AM EST up reply actions  

Hmmm. Attitude problems, If it was anger issues i’d say perfect fit for Philly, but maybe he could join the NY Rangers? They seem to have atleast one player already with a sort of attitude problem.

by CarolinaCaniCats3415 on Feb 15, 2010 11:15 PM EST up reply actions  

Just a thought…I wonder how HARD JR TRIED to trade Babchuk in the offseason? Rutherford was working from a position of strength and was probably more than a bit PO’d. He had just come off a ECF run and was THINKING he had the pieces in place for another run, with or without Babchuk (we all know how that turned out – and I’m not trying to say Babchuk would have necessarily made a big difference, but he probably would have at least scored a few goals and could not be any WORSE on defense that A Ward). So JR could comment to the media that he was entertaining trade offers, but then he could just as easily ask for the moon when other teams called, just to make a point to Babchuk…I.E. “I hold all the cards and you will do as I say.” (And hey he had big bad Aaron Ward waiting in the wings)

My sense was that this got somewhat personal, and I don’t even necessarily think that this was between the player and the GM, as it was between the player’s (former) agent and the GM.

I have not heard any reports that Babchuk was a bad guy in the locker room or that he was not a hard worker. My take has always been that starting with his (and his agent’s) refusal to report to Albany a few years ago, he has been labeled by some in the organization, the media and the fanbase as a bad guy. And quite honestly I think that’s pretty petty.

The guy had a great season last year and improved leaps and bounds both offensively and in his own zone. And he is still a young guy with all trends pointing towards further improvement/developement in the future. He absolutely hit a rough stretch in the playoffs, but that happens to A LOT of young players. Hell it even happens to veterans – Eric Cole anyone?

The Canes/JR lowballed him on his qualifying offer to make a point. The kid (and/or his former agent) did not blink and it turns into a circus. And if I remember correctly, the issue was not $$ per say, as much as it was length of the contract. I thought the whole thing was handled VERY POORLY by BOTH sides. JR puffing out his chest and the kid taking some bad advice. Things usually can only escalate from there.

Bottom line is that I think Babchuk would have helped this team this year and could help in the future. I have no idea if either side is willing to eat a little crow and make that happen. But that is probably what it would take at this point.

I would hope that these two grown men would swallow their pride and try to work something out, but if f we do trade him/his rights I hope that he goes out west where he cannot come back to haunt us down the line. I still think his upside is pretty high.

-m

by UTTRmartin on Feb 16, 2010 12:16 PM EST up reply actions  

He’s making $1.5M in the KHL.

by Kahz on Feb 15, 2010 11:32 AM EST reply actions  

Remember that KHL salaries are quoted tax-free.

So between that and cost of living, call it the equivalent of a $3M NHL contract. Not hard to see why he left.

I’m pretty sure I wouldn’t give him that in the NHL. If somebody else wants to try, let’s make a deal.

That 17-year-old Hokie sitting in the rafters in Greensboro didn't see any of this coming.

by JoshCVT on Feb 15, 2010 11:37 AM EST up reply actions  

That’s one of the reasons why it’s going to be so hard to keep players like Babchuk in the NHL. Mid-level guys with some promise from Russia can either stay in the NHL, or make quite a bit more after taxes are considered and play in their home country. It’s the only area where the KHL can be considered a legitimate threat to poach from the NHL.

Greensboro was a black hole.

by C-Leaguer on Feb 15, 2010 11:53 AM EST up reply actions  

I totally called this in a previous post….

Anton Babchuck has had a horrible attitude…. But all is well that ends well… and all can be forgiven (if you play well in the playoffs).

I’d be willing to give him another chance…. especially since we are about to be minus two defensmen (with Corvo and A. Ward both likely to be traded on 3/3/2010…)

Bring him in now… what would it hurt?

by Mateos_Canes_Lamp on Feb 15, 2010 11:38 AM EST reply actions  

what would it hurt?

Chemistry in the locker room? – which really can mess up the whole team… However I’m ambivalent on this one. Seems risky unless Babchuk is really enthusiastic. Like Jussi was in June.

by Carolyn Christians on Feb 15, 2010 11:50 AM EST up reply actions  

Chemistry in the locker room……

how do we know what effect a player has unless we are in the locker room…. or if it is made public…???

by Mateos_Canes_Lamp on Feb 15, 2010 11:53 AM EST up reply actions  

We don’t know – but it is important. I don’t really know about Babchuk, but his always glum (awkward) presence was a conspicuous part of his character here last season. The opposite of Chad LaRose, for example. Just can’t absorb a lot of those without consequences.

But like I said, if he really would be “happy” here, enthusiastic and grateful for the chance, I say, “Hell yeah! bring back that bomb!” Not to mention, that this would also solve my Babchuk-fish quandary.

Not sure what to do with Cullen fish.

by Carolyn Christians on Feb 15, 2010 2:23 PM EST up reply actions  

you could make the same argument about someone who comes across as being “Glum” or “Awkward” … the “opposite of Chad LaRose”… could be someone like Joe Corvo… a quiet guy who keeps to himself and doesn’t show a lot of emotion…. but all the guys seem to really like him….

by Mateos_Canes_Lamp on Feb 15, 2010 4:08 PM EST up reply actions  

Hold on to Cullen fish until the off season at least. Here’s hoping he may become relevant again.

Or you could start a second tank of previously played for the Hurricanes fish.

by Cyn4Canes on Feb 15, 2010 4:57 PM EST up reply actions  

You might also start a third tank of ex-Hurricanes fish who wish they were back in the Hurricanes fish tank. Then you could have a fourth tank of fish waiting for their work visas so they could come to the Hurricanes tank.

by abramsdoug on Feb 15, 2010 5:00 PM EST up reply actions  

hehe She might as well start a fish store.

by Cyn4Canes on Feb 15, 2010 5:53 PM EST up reply actions  

I believe that because he’s played a game in a league outside of the NHL this season he’d have to clear waivers after signing his contract. Not likely to happen.

Greensboro was a black hole.

by C-Leaguer on Feb 15, 2010 11:55 AM EST up reply actions  

Yes yes yes yes yes. This bad attitude talk is crap . I have been saying we need him Back since we let him go. One of my favorite players on the team last year . Definately yes.

by chrisj on Feb 15, 2010 11:44 AM EST reply actions  

I was “happy” to see him go because I hated his bad attitude… (and you can not deny the attitude… leaving to play in Russia two season ago… and then rejecting his qualifying offer after he knew it was coming…. all the while not having his arbitration rights BECAUSE he bolted for Russia the first time…. come on….)

But I’ll easily admit that we can handle the attitude if he will just come back and play like he did last season…. I’m willing to forget about anything…..

by Mateos_Canes_Lamp on Feb 15, 2010 11:52 AM EST up reply actions  

Babchuk has an attitude issue, no denying that, but the qualifying offer to him was a bit low to say the least. I don’t think Babs is the end all be all, but he did put up 19 goals from the blue line last season. I’ll be the first to say many were late in the season in games that were already decided, but he did do it.

Greensboro was a black hole.

by C-Leaguer on Feb 15, 2010 11:58 AM EST up reply actions  

Totally agree with you there, I thought 1 Million was a bit of a slap in the face considering he was tied for 5th in the whole league for goals scored by defencemen… admitted his defence could improve but he is only 25 – plenty of time to improve many aspects!

by webbo26 on Feb 15, 2010 1:20 PM EST up reply actions  

The offer was low…. but it was due to the fact that Babchuck didn’t have a leg to stand on… when he left for Russia the first time he forfeited his rights to arbitration… So you can’t blame JR for low-balling the player… you have to blame the player for creating a situation where all he could get was what was offered to him….

If Babs would have had arbitration rights then I think you would have seen JR offer him a lot more money than he did….

the low offer was Babchucks fault… JR was just doing what any business person would do….

by Mateos_Canes_Lamp on Feb 15, 2010 4:35 PM EST up reply actions  

Babchuk also had Jack Johnson’s agent, did he not? I don’t think that guy and JR get along very well. If you looked at Babchuk pre-playoffs it was obvious that Mo liked his play as his minutes went up consistently. The playoffs were a typical reaction to the level of intensity, one that may be surprising to the uninitiated.

I believe I recall that Babs was willing to take the final offer from JR at the start of the season, by which point I believe jr said “surry bucko, that ship has sailed” If JR were to put that offer on the table this summer I believe Babchuk would take it.

Also, JR kind of screwed us on this one. Who would you rather have had this year, Babchuk or AWard?

by EricinSC on Feb 15, 2010 5:21 PM EST up reply actions  

Why bring him back to just low ball him? What’s the point of that? I know Babs left and lost arbitration rights, but isn’t one job of the GM asset management? I know the Canes only gave up Danny Richmond for him, but come on. Top five in goals scored from the blue line and all he got for him was nothing because he low balled the guy. That’s poor asset management.

Greensboro was a black hole.

by C-Leaguer on Feb 15, 2010 5:31 PM EST up reply actions  

Not signing a qualifying offer = bad attitude? There must be hundreds of players with bad attitudes in the NHL. Erik Cole = bad attitude.

by Kahz on Feb 15, 2010 8:14 PM EST up reply actions  

so does jiri hudler have an attitude? does any FA that thinks he is owed more money have a bad attitude?
im not buying, it just sounds good as a talking point, but i think its been blown out of preportion

by chrisj on Feb 15, 2010 3:03 PM EST up reply actions  

Babchuck has a reputation for more reasons than “wanting more money.”

by Iggy Reilly on Feb 15, 2010 3:47 PM EST up reply actions  

Exactly. It all began when he refused to be sent to Albany and bolted for the KHL.

I’m hardly an expert, but I have never heard of that happening in the last few years with anyone, anywhere. (Legace was as close as I can think of, and it cost him any chance at an NHL contract this summer until we had our emergency when Cam was cut).

by Carolyn Christians on Feb 15, 2010 4:04 PM EST up reply actions  

But if you’ve proved that your a NHLer would you go back to Albany? Not me, I’d bolt too, who wants to go down once you’ve played an entire season in the pros.

Staal + Jussi = GOAL

by canescup on Feb 15, 2010 4:08 PM EST up reply actions  

well… he should have taken his assignment to Albany…. But I applaud him for standing his ground….

by Mateos_Canes_Lamp on Feb 15, 2010 4:10 PM EST up reply actions  

it was cap reasons. I do believe that he should have followed orders. You gotta earn your stripes in the big leagues

by TylerA7707 on Feb 15, 2010 4:10 PM EST up reply actions  

Are you looking to try win the holiest of holies in the NHL or are you wanting to get paid? I’ve observed that most Russians don’t feel the pull of the cup. For instance: OV and Kovy always say (in regards to nhl vs khl) that they are here to play against the best and beat the best. They never say they’re in the NHL to win the cup.

by Caniac1026 on Feb 15, 2010 4:13 PM EST up reply actions  

Babchuk didnt leave over money

by TylerA7707 on Feb 15, 2010 4:13 PM EST up reply actions  

That’s fine to say that but the fact is he didn’t sign the offer tendered to him, how is it not about money? It’s either that or he didt like our team/coach/management. Would you want him back if it was one of the latter?

by Caniac1026 on Feb 15, 2010 4:35 PM EST up reply actions  

Exactly. It all began when he refused to be sent to Albany and bolted for the KHL

.

Actually, he did not refuse to be sent to Albany then bolt for the KHL. He refused to go to Albany and stayed in Raleigh. The team suspended him, then re-instated him and he continued to stay in Raleigh and eventually got back into the lineup. At the end of the season when his contract was up, he bolted for the KHL and had every right to at that point.

The Canes have had two other players, Matt Murley and Dan LaCouture who were sent to Albany, then bolted for the KHL, officially breaking their contracts. Technically, Babchuk never broke his contract, that’s why JR took him back in 2008-09.

GM of CanesCountry.com

by Bob Wage on Feb 15, 2010 4:40 PM EST up reply actions  

He basically did the same thing then that he did this past season…. just without being demoted to the AHL first…

He still didn’t have arbitration rights…. Which is why he got the low offer this past offseason…

Can’t blame him for going where the money is… And where he speaks the language…

but I also would not be surprised to see him come back… and for JR to offer him more money than the original $1.million offer…

by Mateos_Canes_Lamp on Feb 15, 2010 4:48 PM EST up reply actions  

Not having arbitration rights doesn’t mean that a player should just accept their qualifying offer.

Patrick Eaves didn’t have arbitration rights and got $1.4M/yr for three years. Cam Ward got $2.667m/yr for three years without arbitration rights. Both of those deals were well above their QO. You see it happening around the league all the time.

Just because a player can’t go to arbitration doesn’t mean they have no negotiating power or leverage. That is ESPECIALLY true when dealing with a player who has already left for Russia once. If JR didn’t want to pay Babchuk the money he wanted, then Babchuk could just sign in the KHL. And that happened. Again.

by Kahz on Feb 15, 2010 8:19 PM EST up reply actions  

Really! I didnt know that…..now I like him even more! And REALLY think that JR over played his hand with him!

by TylerA7707 on Feb 15, 2010 4:49 PM EST up reply actions  

Thanks for the clarification. Important that I hadn’t gotten the details right. Makes a bit of a difference, I think.

by Carolyn Christians on Feb 15, 2010 5:54 PM EST up reply actions  

This didn’t happen. Babchuk initially refused to report, then ended up reporting.

He “bolted” for Russia IN THE OFFSEASON when he was not under contract to the Hurricanes. He was an RFA. And the reason he did so was because JR merely offered him a two-way contract.

by Kahz on Feb 15, 2010 8:16 PM EST up reply actions  

Sorry. Didn’t see that somebody had already written basically the same thing.

by Kahz on Feb 15, 2010 8:16 PM EST up reply actions  

Off topic but the Pens (according to ESPN rumors) “may” want to trade Goligoski. We know they want Whitney but cant afford him since JR isnt taking back any salaries, but maybe acquiring Goligoski wouldnt be such a bad idea? Hes got solid numbers and obvious playoff experience. Opinions?

by TylerA7707 on Feb 15, 2010 12:21 PM EST reply actions  

That’s an interesting idea. Goligosky will be coming off his entry level deal, not sure what salary you may be looking at next season. Also, no telling what kind of product of the team he is. He’s got plenty of potential and talent though.

Whitney for Goligoski and a third?

Greensboro was a black hole.

by C-Leaguer on Feb 15, 2010 1:09 PM EST up reply actions  

without looking it up I believe they said hes locked up next year for 1.83mil

by TylerA7707 on Feb 15, 2010 1:16 PM EST up reply actions  

After reading that I checked cap central at hockeybuzz. His cap hit is 1.83 mil He makes 1.25 this year, followed by 1.5 next year and 2.75 the following year. That out year may make him difficult to acquire for the Canes.

Greensboro was a black hole.

by C-Leaguer on Feb 15, 2010 2:19 PM EST up reply actions  

I guess I’m ambivalent on this one. I can see some of the good things he brings to the team, but I also see his downside. Was his absence the single missing component that sunk the team this season? No I don’t think it was and he won’t be the single component to fix it either.

For reasonable money and no drama, I’d take him back. But then again, didn’t we want to get away from recycling former players?

"This guy is as meat and potatoes as there is of a man."
Gleason for Emperor!

by caniacgirl on Feb 15, 2010 12:31 PM EST reply actions  

I am not totally against the recycle as long as it’s done smartly. Seidenberg would be a welcome recycle. Similar to the Cullen recycle in that since he has left, we have missed his particular skillset. Babs would not be a recycle, just the utilization of an asset.

by wylde4canes on Feb 15, 2010 12:53 PM EST up reply actions  

Fair enough. I personally have no issue with recycling guys as long as there is a reason for it (like bringing back Seidenberg).

"This guy is as meat and potatoes as there is of a man."
Gleason for Emperor!

by caniacgirl on Feb 15, 2010 1:03 PM EST up reply actions  

I think it would be fair to say that the management of the team made a mistake in NOT bringing Seidenberg back this season….

by Mateos_Canes_Lamp on Feb 15, 2010 1:57 PM EST up reply actions  

Would Seidenburg have made that big of a difference?

Greensboro was a black hole.

by C-Leaguer on Feb 15, 2010 2:20 PM EST up reply actions  

Seidenberg Vs. Aaron Ward

  It is a great question about Seidenberg’s impact. It is complicated by the fact that Eaves was traded to get Aaron Ward — so Ward’s salary was much more affordable. My view is that Aaron Ward was so horrible that if it were possible not to have him on team and to have retained Seidenberg the difference would have been enormous. It is the gap between Aaron Ward’s actual play and Seidenberg’s play that would have had the difference in perhaps as many as three or four losses that would have been victories. 6 or 8 more points at the moment is the difference from being in the mix and watching from the outside while hoping for a miracle. It isn’t that Seidenberg is that fantastic as much as his replacement was awful for almost half the season.

by abramsdoug on Feb 15, 2010 2:29 PM EST up reply actions  

If you mean simply adding him to what we currently have in place, then I would say no. If you mean having him instead of other players, I think there may have been some difference.

It’s kind of a moot point now though. Those “if only’s” only get you so far and hindsight is 20/20, but FWIW, I always liked Seids’s game and was disappointed when JR didn’t resign him (even before I saw the current season unfold).

"This guy is as meat and potatoes as there is of a man."
Gleason for Emperor!

by caniacgirl on Feb 15, 2010 2:57 PM EST up reply actions  

Seidenberg

  I must have been one of the few Caniacs who really didn’t like Seidenberg’s game that much. I thought he was a great teammate and had a very reasonable skill set. My observation was that his speed seemed to go up and down in terms of performance in a very unpredictable fashion. Also, in watching him, Seidenberg had a knack for making the wrong decision at a key time. He struck me as the hockey equivalent of Gene Wilder in the movie Stir Crazy trying to learn how to dance with soul from Richard Pryor’s instructions. I realize many others disagree; and I would much rather than signed Seidenberg than obtain Aaron Ward — although I don’t think that was feasible at the time.

by abramsdoug on Feb 15, 2010 3:15 PM EST up reply actions  

I agree I never was a big fan of Seids either, just an average D-man. Didn’t hurt my feelings that much when he moved on.

Staal + Jussi = GOAL

by canescup on Feb 15, 2010 4:10 PM EST up reply actions  

Yeah… nobody likes a defenseman who can block shots and stays in position… We would rather have the “miserable” Aaron Ward…..

by Mateos_Canes_Lamp on Feb 15, 2010 4:11 PM EST up reply actions  

I never said I’d rather have F**king A.Ward.

Staal + Jussi = GOAL

by canescup on Feb 15, 2010 4:12 PM EST up reply actions  

The only reason Seids walked was because we traded for A. Ward and didn’t offer the true #4 a contract…..

by Mateos_Canes_Lamp on Feb 15, 2010 4:13 PM EST up reply actions  

At the time, without the benefit of hindsight, Aaron Ward was felt to be a far superior defenseman than Seidenberg. That assessment turned out to be totally inaccurate. I have not seen a soul say they preferred the Aaron Ward who showed up this season over Seidenberg.

by abramsdoug on Feb 15, 2010 4:49 PM EST up reply actions  

I like Seids, but I do think it’s funny, that Babs is kind of taking a beating on this thread for leaving because he wanted more money and Dennis not taking a beating even though he left for the exact same reason. JR kept negotiating with Dennis up until Ward was acquired. For all Dennis’s posturing he got a 1 year 2.5 offer from Florida when he had a multi-year deal offer from Carolina in the 1.75 to 2 per year range.

Greensboro was a black hole.

by C-Leaguer on Feb 15, 2010 4:13 PM EST up reply actions  

Seids was not even offered a contract until after we traded for Aaron Ward… He was not going to get a fair deal because he had already been replaced….

by Mateos_Canes_Lamp on Feb 15, 2010 4:14 PM EST up reply actions  

snooze you loose

Staal + Jussi = GOAL

by canescup on Feb 15, 2010 4:17 PM EST up reply actions  

That’s incorrect. JR was negotiating with Seids before July 1. Talks broke off, and then were resurrected not long after Cole and Rosey signed. Talks broke off yet again only to start back up not long before JR traded for Ward.

Dennis left because he thought there was more money and a longer term deal out there. He was wrong.

Greensboro was a black hole.

by C-Leaguer on Feb 15, 2010 4:20 PM EST up reply actions  

Check out this story from July 14th, ten full days before the Canes acquired Aaron Ward.

Greensboro was a black hole.

by C-Leaguer on Feb 15, 2010 4:28 PM EST up reply actions  

No worries. I honestly think that if Seidenberg would have taken a 2 year 4 million contract he’d be a Cane right now and Aaron Ward would still be in Boston. Don’t know what would have happened to Eaves. Was TKO signed before or after Eaves was traded?

Greensboro was a black hole.

by C-Leaguer on Feb 15, 2010 5:33 PM EST up reply actions  

Agents

   Seidenberg was another youngish player hurt by his agent. Seidenberg would have been much better off signing a two year deal with Carolina and then making himself invaluable instead of testing the free agent market.

   Similarly, Babchuk would have been much, much better off signing with Carolina for a one year deal and if he continued to score with his 100 mph shot, he would be another invaluable player who would be very highly paid.

   I think it is a shame when agents’ seem to be less interested in nurturing their clients’ careers than in short term gain for themselves.

by abramsdoug on Feb 15, 2010 4:57 PM EST up reply actions  

Seids had the right to go for more money. Babchuk didn’t (unless he got an offer sheet).

by Cory Lavalette on Feb 15, 2010 9:20 PM EST up reply actions  

He was as hot blocking machine, was normally positionally sound, and he was feet enough to get back alot of the time he was out.

I am not trying to treat him like the next big thing, but the guy had elemnst to his game we have not well replaced. I find him similar to Alberts only with a higher offensive contribution.

by wylde4canes on Feb 15, 2010 4:12 PM EST up reply actions  

as hot blocking = a shot blocking sorry!

by wylde4canes on Feb 15, 2010 4:12 PM EST up reply actions  

thought you meant he was HOT……

Staal + Jussi = GOAL

by canescup on Feb 15, 2010 4:13 PM EST up reply actions  

I thought you meant he did some real interesting choreography for stage productions.

Greensboro was a black hole.

by C-Leaguer on Feb 15, 2010 4:13 PM EST up reply actions  

no i think that would be pop and locking……=)

by wylde4canes on Feb 15, 2010 4:14 PM EST up reply actions  

or it it the other way around……. I am showing my age and ignorance now!

by wylde4canes on Feb 15, 2010 4:15 PM EST up reply actions  

Right order, and funny!

Greensboro was a black hole.

by C-Leaguer on Feb 15, 2010 4:20 PM EST up reply actions  

  The timing of Seidenberg’s mistakes seemed to be especially unfortunate. Malkin twisted Seidenberg up like a pretzel during the Pittsburgh series — but then again, Seidenberg is only one of many defensemen who have been made to look silly by Malkin.

by abramsdoug on Feb 15, 2010 4:52 PM EST up reply actions  

Get away from Recycling former players?

It has been said publicly that the team would like to re-sign Cullen and Whitney next season… (JR even hinted to this in an interview w/ 99.9fm last week).

This team will always recycle former players….

by Mateos_Canes_Lamp on Feb 15, 2010 1:55 PM EST up reply actions  

myself personally

despite the poor start the canes had , I’m not sure if Babchuk would have made much of an impact. but if JR wants to try and bring him back, then it will happen, but have anyone of the insiders here, as in those who are closer to the bench and office has heard any hints or rumors as to what JR may or may not do ? persoanlly until we, the fans have heard or seen the announcement either way, i think we all ought to let a sleeping dawg lie…until it’s time…after all when was the last time anyone here got a raise or promotion on mere “speculation” ? Not trying to rain on anyone’s parade or being ugly about him or the situation, but to me it’s just a waste of time and effort to be concerned over something many of us can’t do anything about…be safe everyone

Relax !! Even Micro Wave Popcorn takes time !! Go Canes !!

by CaniacSteve on Feb 15, 2010 12:57 PM EST reply actions  

I think what he’s said in public is what he truly thinks: Anton thinks there’s away around the system, and JR has said, “nope … this is how it is.”

But I do think it’s a topic worth addressing, especially with the deadline looming. Just b/c Anton’s not here doesn’t mean JR doesn’t have the option of shipping his rights elsewhere to sweeten the pot to get better return on other assets he ships out in the next few weeks. Also, if JR does plan to try and bring him back next year, that impacts what he will try and get in return for the assets he intends to move after the Olympics. We already saw JR tip his hand some by acquiring Picard — that’s one spot on a D that currently has five penciled in for next year (pending other moves): Picard, Pitkanen, Gleason, Carson, Alberts.

by Cory Lavalette on Feb 15, 2010 1:42 PM EST up reply actions  

Steve- we enjoy speculating, analyzing, and discussing things here. That’s what hockey fans do. There is no need to let a “sleeping dog lie”.

Many of us can’t do anything about who will win the gold medal either, but it doesn’t stop anyone from discussing it or speculating, now does it?

GM of CanesCountry.com

by Bob Wage on Feb 15, 2010 2:00 PM EST up reply actions  

Ok Bob

I understand your point. I don’t agree in this case. Boychuk has in sevberal documented ways cut his own throat. And that sir is between him,his agent, and JR right ? Now with that out of the way let me ask you this: seeing you and several others who lead this section of Canes Country, why can’t you,LTD and cory get better & more information from direct sources to better inform we the fans, soi could slow down or all but stop the idol loose lips jaw jacking and responding to things it was " supposedly rumored" about ? Not being ugly just rather perplexed as i see it in that way. you and others here go to the rinks have access to the players & staff and grant you 90% of the time whenasked JR & MO will give ya a no comment or some other brush off…so they don’t have to say or reveal anything before they are ready to if at all . As a retired police investigtor & administrator sure there were times when we couldn’t release details or some of them to the press because if we did it could cause more problems and in 2 cases it did. So i do understand and respect that. But i see what you folks do here with blog and etc…is at times just a repeat of what Chip over @ the N&O puts out. Am i wrong in thinking that you have as much access as he does ( chip) ? or am i wrong. Yes i like to discuss what has happened on the ice. Who did what how did that compare to last week,month or a year ago type of stuff…but like Jack Webs chariator Joe friday used to say…" Just the facts" Or am i wrong in having those kinds of what i see as “reasonable expectations” ? Again not being ugly or trying to bre difficult here. But and seeing we are talking about the Canes as a team, all of us were given the impression that the 09/10 canes would be a wee bit better that the season before…yet we all know better now…I guess I’m trying NOT to set my self up yet again to be grossly disappointed…thank you for the efforts…and again, i thank you and all here the chance and place to voice my thoughts and on occassions,my opinions

Relax !! Even Micro Wave Popcorn takes time !! Go Canes !!

by CaniacSteve on Feb 15, 2010 11:59 PM EST up reply actions  

Steve-

Not sure why you have a problem with me, and why you even come here at all since you obviously do have a problem. You never seem happy with an article. First off, if you truly pay attention, sometimes Chip will repeat things that we talk about here just as much as the other way around. But I’m not sure you do pay attention to the time stamps or even know when things get posted.

Secondly, Chip works for the N&O as the full time beat writer for the Hurricanes. Sometimes he travels with the team and he is with them almost daily. I work another job full time and try to cover the Canes when I can on a part-time basis. Having said that, I think we put out just as much news, information, and insight, if not more so, than any other Hurricanes website. Our traffic would seem to validate what we do here.

Yes, I do have some access, but not the same access as Chip. I don’t have Rutherford’s phone number on speed dial, but regardless, I would not bother to ask him about Babchuk at this point in time even if I did. He probably doesn’t know what he’s going to do about him yet.

This was a topic open for discussion…it was not meant to be news, it was a column type piece. Can you grasp that concept? If people were not interested in discussing this subject, there would not be 130 plus comments and 350 plus votes on the poll regarding this.

We don’t do “just the facts” here because to me, that’s boring. And I think you are trying to be ugly and difficult since you seem to be negative whenever you post regarding me. Perhaps you do not like analysis and opinions and/or discussion to be mixed in with the news, but that is what I enjoy writing and that is what we do here. Quite often.

I am not Chip. I’m not going to try to be Chip and I’m not going to try to write like Chip. I suggest if that bothers you, you go back to Canes Now and assume your name of “estaban” and continue to read Chip because I am not changing what we do here.

If you would like to discuss this more, just send me an email. canescountry@gmail.com

GM of CanesCountry.com

by Bob Wage on Feb 16, 2010 2:29 AM EST up reply actions  

Hurrar!

Good on you Bob! There’s no need to change a thing, I think you, Cory and HM do a great job! If people want facts perhaps they should go sit over at ch.com and wait for their sporadic updates… I personally much prefer to have something to read and discuss on a more frequent basis and you all do a very good job of doing that!

Possibly people forget this is a BLOG, meant for discussion and speculation?

by webbo26 on Feb 16, 2010 4:12 AM EST up reply actions  

  Bob, although I understand CaniacSteve’s points and concerns, I agree with you that there is a difference between CC and Canes. I am glad you are not changing the format. I do respectfully suggest you might have come down somewhat hard on CaniacSteve. He posts regularly at Canes Now and here; and always has interesting points.

   In terms of dealing with rumors and not attributing the sources, I have no problem with that approach at all. Some people do have conversations with knowledgeable people that are strictly not for attribution but give a clearer idea of what is happening with the Hurricanes. It is not easy to separate out those folks from people who have far less reliable sources; and the best test is to compare what actually happens with what was predicted.

   I think Chip would conceded Canes Now is a place for Chip to provide us with editorial opinions and hockey analysis. CC is fantastic because you, Cory, HM2, and others provide analysis and a forum for open discussion. CC is awesome.

by abramsdoug on Feb 16, 2010 6:42 AM EST up reply actions  

Typo fixed

 Bob, although I understand CaniacSteve’s points and concerns, I agree with you that there is a difference between CC and Canes. I am glad you are not changing the format. I do respectfully suggest you might have come down somewhat hard on CaniacSteve. He posts regularly at Canes Now and here; and always has interesting points.

   In terms of dealing with rumors and not attributing the sources, I have no problem with that approach at all. Some people do have conversations with knowledgeable people that are strictly not for attribution but give a clearer idea of what is happening with the Hurricanes. It is not easy to separate out those folks from people who have far less reliable sources; and the best test is to compare what actually happens with what was predicted.

   I think Chip would conceded Canes Now is not a place for Chip to provide us with his own editorial opinions and hockey analysis. CC is fantastic because you, Cory, HM2, and others provide analysis and a forum for open discussion. CC is awesome.

by abramsdoug on Feb 16, 2010 6:43 AM EST up reply actions  

I agree that Bob came “down somewhat hard on CaniacSteve”. But I think it was about time.
The guy’s been throwing arrogant little jabs at lots of stuff they write. And when a person feels compelled to say ‘not being ugly but’ numerous times, well, they’re being ugly.

by drifterscape on Feb 16, 2010 8:39 AM EST up reply actions  

I actually thought Bob was quite fair to CaniacSteve. I have typed a similar post several times just to delete it because I figured it wasn’t my place to say anything.
And… he really needs to use spell check :)

Thanks to Bob, Cory and HM2 for providing us a place to discuss the “What ifs” along with the “What is”. I’m glad you’re not like Chip. It’s more interesting to have different perspectives instead of all the same rehashed press releases.

by Cyn4Canes on Feb 16, 2010 8:47 AM EST up reply actions  

Saying “not trying to be ugly” doesn’t absolve CaniacSteve from being ugly. I think we’ve said this a zillion times, but if you don’t like a topic, discussion, whatever … gloss over it. The only people, IMO, who have an obligation to try and comment on everything here is Bob, HM and me b/c we’re the ones who trying to keep the site afloat. And as Bob mentioned, we do that not as a FT job but as a hobby out of passion (be it for hockey, writing, journalism, or all three).

There are oodles of sources that will report just the facts — that’s what makes the internet such a great thing. Here, we bring you the news in a timely matter, but also sprinkle in opinion, speculation and analysis. Chip does the same (his Monday question, for example), but we can’t pretend to compete with Chip given his wealth of reporting experience and the fact that this is his job. At the same time, we’re not competitive with Chip — we all greatly value what he does. We’re just a group here (and that includes all the readers who give their great insight) doing what we can to make following the Canes that much more fun and interesting.

I don’t think CaniacSteve needs to stop posting — I don’t think Bob means that either — but the “interesting points” you mention, AD, have been few and fair between and instead been mostly criticisms of what’s done here. I don’t mind a critic (I don’t think any of us does), but given that we open this forum up to comments, criticisms, praise — whatever — we also have a voice. I think it’s unfair for CaniacSteve to bash Bob when he has no idea the time, effort and money he puts into this all out of his passion for the team, the sport and all of you.

Bob is a GREAT guy. Not a good guy — a great one. When he reached out to me about writing here, my thinking was I’d give it a try. You know what? It’s been perfect. And that’s b/c of Bob.

by Cory Lavalette on Feb 16, 2010 9:20 AM EST up reply actions  

In retrospect, perhaps I was tough on Steve and if I was, I apologize. He has the right to be ugly if he wants to be. But he does not need to post multiple times in the same thread that he does not like a particular story. We got it the first time.

When he says “Babchuk has cut his own throat”, that is his opinion. Not everyone agrees and THAT, was the purpose of the article. To ask for opinions and to spur discussion.

It always fascinates me to see how diversified opinions can be within the Caniac Nation. We can watch the same player in the same game, yet disagree how that player performed. Sometimes we can learn from other opinions and sometimes we’re surprised with the results. This is how some fans learn more about the game and/or the team.

I am not a professional writer, but that doesn’t give me a free pass to write a bunch of baloney. I have learned a lot over the past four years through my CC experience and I have improved since my early days. People give me tips all the time, so hopefully I will continue to learn and improve even more.

Finally, I am always open to constructive suggestions on how to improve our reporting or how to improve the site in general. We have an open email policy, so please do not hesitate to contact us. Thanks.

GM of CanesCountry.com

by Bob Wage on Feb 16, 2010 10:47 AM EST up reply actions  

Great Work by Bob

  Bob, you do great work. I found this statement by you to be particularly interesting and insightful

It always fascinates me to see how diversified opinions can be within the Caniac Nation. We can watch the same player in the same game, yet disagree how that player performed. Sometimes we can learn from other opinions and sometimes we’re surprised with the results. This is how some fans learn more about the game and/or the team.

   We have quite knowledgeable Caniacs posting their observations and opinions; and with regard to some players, we reach entirely different conclusions about the players. I think it goes back to a concept of psychology that can be summarized as “if you believe it, you will see it.”

   We begin with perspectives about players and then tend to seek out examples that support that conclusion. One important purpose of CC is a reality check for all of us to see how our perspectives are consistent or inconsistent with the views of other people.

  The only thing I would like done slightly differently is to have some kind of edit function after something is posted, so the grammar police won’t knock down my door.

by abramsdoug on Feb 16, 2010 11:02 AM EST up reply actions  

Canes Country

My quick 2 cents on this: What makes this site great is the fact that its NOT just the standard Maurice soundbytes, or the official team press releases. Seriously, that stuff is certainly vital but it rarely, if ever delves into an issue deeper or asks the questions that fans probably have asked themselves.

I guess I just hope people realize that this site is truly unique in the Triangle/Canes region. Chip gives you the facts, CH.com gives the official PR info, but Canes Country adds opinion, speculation, original reporting, and maybe most importantly: FANS PERSPECTIVES (gotta love the Live Game Threads!).

All of those added together make for a full experience for a fan. An experience I haven’t yet found elsewhere. Thanks guys!

by WPTF Phil on Feb 16, 2010 11:23 AM EST up reply actions  

U Got mail Bob

I do believe that the email will answer what concerns i have & Had. and no, you weren’t or were not " hard on me. hell, eveyone gets “miffed” when rubbed the wrong way. I based my thoughts and conclutions based on what you wrote ans published here. Now you are correct you are NOT Chip. But you write like Chip you by your own bio have published things. so what is a reasonable & prudent person to think? Again you,Cory & HM2 do a great job, but and while "facts’ are boring, but they are the truth speculation & enuendos are not . have a good night sir
respectfully your Caniac Steve ( AKA esteban1949)

Relax !! Even Micro Wave Popcorn takes time !! Go Canes !!

by CaniacSteve on Feb 17, 2010 12:31 AM EST up reply actions  

Blogs are about more than the news, they are a place for people to discuss their opinions and, yes, speculation. It is based on the facts, but interpretation is welcome. If you want “pure” news then go to a news outlet, but the whole purpose of this type of forum is to go beyond the facts and to editorialize in ways that the average joe did not have access to before in traditional media.

by Raccoon Fink on Feb 17, 2010 9:34 AM EST up reply actions  

“I understand your point. I don’t agree in this case. Boychuk has in sevberal documented ways cut his own throat.”

Why are we talking about Boychuk now? I’m confused.

-m

by UTTRmartin on Feb 16, 2010 1:15 PM EST up reply actions  

I think he meant “Babchuk” and mistakenly wrote Boychuck. Don’t worry it took me a few times of reading that to figure it out. For a sec I was thinking “already Boychuck and his agent are creating issues?? What the hell?? Oh…”

by WPTF Phil on Feb 16, 2010 1:28 PM EST up reply actions  

He also wrote LTD when I think he meant HM. But that’s just splitting hairs.

Sees the world through ruuu-colored glasses...
Sisu

by Jamie Kellner on Feb 16, 2010 2:39 PM EST up reply actions  

yeah…I was just poking around at esteban…err, caniac steve…I fully realize from my days over at Canes Now (where I rarely find myself venturing these days) that you have to make your best assumption as to what he is talking about most of the time.

And for what it’s worth I’ll join the lovefest…Bob, Cory and HM…you guys (and gal) rock. Don’t go changin…

-martin

by UTTRmartin on Feb 17, 2010 12:33 AM EST up reply actions  

Caniac Steve is Esteban? Is that for real, or are you just guessing? He’s one of the main reasons I don’t post over at Canes Now.

Greensboro was a black hole.

by C-Leaguer on Feb 17, 2010 3:44 PM EST up reply actions  

I'm here to speculate and rant! LoL

I think the potential negatives outweigh the potential positives. You’d got players that WANT to play here and will take cuts for it. You’ve got a young group of D-men climbing their way through the ranks and grateful for their opportunity. Then you’ve got Babs who, right or wrong, wants dollar figures. I’d rather have the young guys build up their abilities (even if it means sacrificing next year as well) than have Babs’ miscalculated attitude back here. I think we could do well to trade his rights at the draft. Then he will get his dues with another team and the Canes can move on – everyone is happy.
Besides, someone Babs’ size should be throwing their weight around like a bull in a China shop. He’s too soft along the boards!

by Caniac1026 on Feb 15, 2010 1:07 PM EST reply actions  

But Babchuk IS young, he’s only 25 and not 26 until May.

Therefore although he’s a fair few years older than McBain he is still younger than a couple of players – Rodney and Harrison – and only a single year older than players such as Carson, Borer and newly acquired Picard.

And then of course you have to take into consideration the fact that he has already played 168 regular season games and 13 playoff games, whereas the other 5 defensive prospects mentioned above (McBain not included due to being so much younger) only have 292 regular season games played between all of them, and considering Picard has played 184 of those 292 games thats a lot of inexperienced rookies who are either older than, or just a single year younger than Babchuk.

And just for good measure, none of those 5 have EVER played a single NHL playoff game, so we would have to put up with them going through what Babs possibly went through last year in having a dismal first playoff run due to nerves/inexperience…?

So although he might not be the greatest defender, he is definitely a great offensive threat from the blueline and personally I thought should have been considered for a much better contract than a single million. This slap in the face probably contributed to his supposed “attitude problem” as he feels under-appreciated, I know I would! Also I don’t think we can place all the blame on Babs’ shoulders for chasing the big bucks, I seem to remember him having a god awful manager of whom Babs had to resort to firing this past off season after he failed to re-negotiate with JR… although I don’t seem to be able to find the link at the mo…

by webbo26 on Feb 15, 2010 1:51 PM EST up reply actions  

Babchuk disappeared in the playoffs because other teams figured out that if you pressure him with the puck, he ca’t get a shot off and will probably turn it over. They haven’t forgotten that.

Trade his rights as a pot-sweetener, and let someone else deal with him.

by Gillimus on Feb 15, 2010 3:12 PM EST up reply actions  

No Divas Allowed

   I think the Hurricanes do a great job of avoiding Divas. I personally liked Babchuk even though he collapsed in the playoffs. What Jim Rutherford would know and I would not is whether Babchuk is a diva or whether he is just an emotionally immature young man who will mature. The Hurricanes organization is a great organization in terms of nurturing players.

   From what I have seen, Babchuk is a high maintenance person and I suspect he is a person who has clinical depression — by piecing various bits of information together. Gillimus may well be right that the risk is not worth it. I would probably err on the side of giving Babchuk another chance.

by abramsdoug on Feb 15, 2010 3:20 PM EST up reply actions  

Or if he’s getting bad advice/guidance from an agent or friend.

by Cory Lavalette on Feb 15, 2010 3:49 PM EST up reply actions  

Which is a pretty good way to get shown the door by this organization.

Greensboro was a black hole.

by C-Leaguer on Feb 15, 2010 4:14 PM EST up reply actions  

Just because Babchuk was shut down over a 12 game span does not mean that he would be shut down for the rest of his career. He was a 24-25 year old making his first playoff appearance.

Quite funny that a 30+ year-old veteran in Erik Cole was re-signed despite having a stunning 0 goals and 5 assists in his last 32 playoff games, yet a much younger Babchuk gets tossed away for the same reason.

by Kahz on Feb 15, 2010 8:24 PM EST up reply actions  

By “young group”, I meant guys payed their dues in Albany that haven’t run to Omsk to be with their mommies. Babs is only 25, true, but I wasn’t counting him when I said “climbing their way through the ranks.”
I’d actually rather have 1 or 2 rawer member of the d-corps than have Babs back. Consider this though:
If we keep Gleason, Pitts, & Alberts, that leaves 3 slots for Carson, McBain, Rodney and Boer (not to sound preemptive, but he’s 10 games, 4 pts, +6 since returning) to fight over, not counting a possible, more reliable acquisition over the summer than either Babs, Seidenberg or the Rats. And we could always end up keeping Corvo (which I wouldn’t really mind). You’ve got a pretty full lineup there.

by Caniac1026 on Feb 15, 2010 4:09 PM EST up reply actions  

and not a single one of those guys are gonna score 19 goals next season….bet on it!

by TylerA7707 on Feb 15, 2010 4:12 PM EST up reply actions  

in 06, the highest scoring D-man on the Canes – AWard and Kabs with 6g each
in 2009 Chris Letang lead the Penns in d-goals with 10
in 2008 Rafalski lead the Wings d-goals with 13
I don’t see the correlation between high-scoring d-men and team success.

by Caniac1026 on Feb 15, 2010 4:31 PM EST up reply actions  

I cant place my finger on it….but something about this argument doesnt make sense. Maybe its that “high scoring dmen” doenst AUTOMATICALLY = success. Its a collection of things. You could make your argument for any player or any position in the league. Gerber as a starter led us to the playoffs. Yet teams with better goaltenders miss the playoffs. NJ didnt win the cup the last couple years either but do you think they “dont see the correlation between high save percentages and team success”?

by TylerA7707 on Feb 15, 2010 4:38 PM EST up reply actions  

Ovechkin scored 56 goals last year and was knocked out in the 2nd round. “I dont see the correlation between high-scoring forwards and team success.”

Not trying to be a smart ass, just dont know any other way to show you the error of your argument.

by TylerA7707 on Feb 15, 2010 4:44 PM EST up reply actions  

My argument was specific to d-men inferring a cup win; and in the post-lockout era it’s a flawless argument.
I agree with you that there are pieces to puzzles. But I also don’t see the point of bending over backwards to make a piece stick to the rest of the puzzle. And, to me, 3 chances is bending over backwards….although we may have to do just that to trade his rights :-)

by Caniac1026 on Feb 15, 2010 5:02 PM EST up reply actions  

It’s not a flawless argument at all. You are looking at goal totals only. And ignoring that Sergei Gonchar missed most of the season the Pens won the Cup and thus didn’t put up a ton of goals/points.

The Wings had two top-notch point producing defensemen in Lidstrom and Rafalski (both 59 points). The Ducks had Niedermayer (69 points) and Pronger (59 points in just 68 games). The Hurricanes have Pitkanen at a career high 44 points and…..?. Yeah, we don’t stack up well.

 

by Kahz on Feb 15, 2010 8:30 PM EST up reply actions  

And I’d note that Gonchar scored 65 points the season prior to the Cup win and had 19 points in 25 games that season.

And do you know why the Penguins were able to get away with only one big point-producing defenseman? Crosby and Malkin. Not Eric Staal and Jussi Jokinen. That makes quite the difference.

by Kahz on Feb 15, 2010 8:32 PM EST up reply actions  

Whenever your highest scoring forward only scores 30…. 19 from a D-man makes a HUGE impact…..

by Mateos_Canes_Lamp on Feb 15, 2010 4:52 PM EST up reply actions  

oh and I’ve been sayint 19 all along too, but actually it was 16 goals and 19 asst

by TylerA7707 on Feb 15, 2010 4:53 PM EST up reply actions  

Rodney = career AHLer, older than Babchuk. Stop mentioning this guy. If he’s ever on the Hurricanes blueline then we are in TROUBLE.

by Kahz on Feb 15, 2010 8:25 PM EST up reply actions  

Younger defense = best bet

Not sure would want to mess with the development of Carson, Rodney, McBain, etc. by cluttering the slots here in the NHL for those guys. Let’s just finish out the season, bring those boys up, and see what shakes out. Couldn’t be any worse than this past year’s start, and the younger boys would bring enthusiasm.

That said, if we were to bring back Babs and trade him for more picks that would make sense.

by Capt. Stinky on Feb 15, 2010 1:08 PM EST reply actions  

So… you’re saying Babchuck is old?

by Mateos_Canes_Lamp on Feb 15, 2010 1:49 PM EST up reply actions  

Rodney is older than Babchuk. And he’s not good.

by Kahz on Feb 15, 2010 8:33 PM EST up reply actions  

Personally, I don’t care for Anton Babchuk. I just never warmed up to him when he played here. There’s not one ounce of rational thought in my opinion of him, though, just personal opinion, but my preference would be for him not to be on the roster again.

During the time he was here, I never heard a word about him being a problem in the locker room or having chemistry issues with the other players.

I do think he handled being sent down to Albany poorly, although in fairness he could have been acting on bad advice from his agent, or there could have been language barrier issues. I think his post-season comments that sounded so disparaging were blown way out of proportion by the blogs and message boards and again I think a lot of it was due to context and translation.

That all being said, he’s an organization asset, and I’d like to see the team get something in return for him, but I’d rather it be part of a trade to bring something else of value here, rather than have him playing here.

Sees the world through ruuu-colored glasses...
Sisu

by Jamie Kellner on Feb 15, 2010 1:26 PM EST reply actions  

He is going to be nearly impossible to trade…. They already tried it last year before he left for Russia… again….

by Mateos_Canes_Lamp on Feb 15, 2010 1:49 PM EST up reply actions  

They tried to trade his rights, at that point he hadn’t signed a contract. I can’t see someone trading for a defensemen that wouldn’t necessarily play for you.

by EricinSC on Feb 15, 2010 5:40 PM EST up reply actions  

I wasn’t a big fan of his personally either. I would also like the team to get something for him whether it be through trade or his return to Raleigh.

"This guy is as meat and potatoes as there is of a man."
Gleason for Emperor!

by caniacgirl on Feb 15, 2010 2:58 PM EST up reply actions  

Anyone know Bab’s jersey# for Omsk? I wanted to go back and watch that brawl on youtube to see what his involvement was – there’s a rumor that some will face criminal charges.

by Caniac1026 on Feb 15, 2010 1:27 PM EST reply actions  

In other news…. Aaron Ward is “Miserable” in Carolina.

He thinks he is miserable… he should consider how we all felt watching his sorry ass self waffle around during the first half of the season…..

If he goes back to Boston he could probably get his radio gig back too….

by Mateos_Canes_Lamp on Feb 15, 2010 2:07 PM EST reply actions  

you’d like to see him quoted … but it’s surely been a frustrating year for him.

by Cory Lavalette on Feb 15, 2010 2:13 PM EST up reply actions  

Yeah, hard to read into that since its supposedly thoughts from a CSN reporter who “has heard” that Ward is miserable and wants to return to Boston.

But yeah, I can understand why he’d feel that way. I’ve been bashing him off and on, but the human reality is you know the guy wants to perform. You know he feels terrible about it.

by WPTF Phil on Feb 15, 2010 2:38 PM EST up reply actions  

How funny would it be though if he were traded back to Boston for Carolina’s fourth round pick that they sent to Boston with Eaves for Ward? Sort of like a do over.

Greensboro was a black hole.

by C-Leaguer on Feb 15, 2010 4:15 PM EST up reply actions  

No complaints for me there!

by WPTF Phil on Feb 16, 2010 11:26 AM EST up reply actions  

It would make a lot of sense on both sides. Boston could use Ward back to help shore up Thomas and the untested Rask. It would cost them nothing.

Greensboro was a black hole.

by C-Leaguer on Feb 16, 2010 12:48 PM EST up reply actions  

Aaron Ward

   I saw that article earlier this morning from one of Bob’s posts on another SBNation site. Needless to say, as far as I am concerned the screen door can’t hit Aaron Ward on his way out fast enough. He has played better, but that is little consolation to me as I watch Cullen traded and Whitney in all likelihood soon to be traded. He was pathetic at the start of the season and by the time he started auditioning for other teams after being waived and unclaimed, it was too late. In conclusion, yes, Aaron Ward was indeed miserable at Carolina.

by abramsdoug on Feb 15, 2010 2:16 PM EST up reply actions  

I think Ward’s play lately is a large part of the reason we still have a slight chance of playing extra hockey. If he plays well enough to get himself an offer to somewhere else, good for him. If you look at what Chara did last year compared to this year I think that Ward has a point about how important he was to that award. I think he came here without confidence and played flat, and I would almost hate for him to go somewhere else to play for the cup now that he has been built back up. Almost.
If we lose enough defensemen would tht drive his price up? One more second round?

by EricinSC on Feb 15, 2010 5:54 PM EST up reply actions  

Are you seriously ascribing Zdeno Chara’s play (who has been nominated for the Norris multiple times prior to playing with Ward) from last year to this year to Aaron Ward? No, it’s the other way around. Does Aaron Ward leaving Boston also explain them dropping from Top 5 to bottom 5 in goals scored? I guess Ward leaving also explains Kessel and Kobasew being traded, Lucic and Savard being hurt, Krejci coming off surgery..all things that can have a factor on Chara’s stats.

“I would almost hate for him to go somewhere else to play for the cup now that he has been built back up. Almost.”

Total and absolute insanity. I’d waive him and let him rot in the AHL. Playing decent for a few weeks after playing like absolute garbage for several months does not endear me to a player. He’s absolutely awful.

by Kahz on Feb 15, 2010 8:37 PM EST up reply actions  

You’re right that Chara has been nominated for the Norris trophy multiple times. He was nominated in 2004, 2008 and 2009. But he was not nominated multiple times prior to playing with Ward. His nomination in 2004 came when he was playing with Wade Redden who had not yet fallen off the face of the planet. Ward and Chara worked well together. Ward’s game allows Chara to play to his strengths. They’re better together than they are apart.

And no, Ward being gone doesn’t explain the lack of goal scoring, but it sure does seem coincidental that Ward is gone from Boston and that Chara hasn’t looked as good as he did last year and that Tim Thomas’ numbers aren’t as good.

Greensboro was a black hole.

by C-Leaguer on Feb 15, 2010 9:39 PM EST up reply actions  

are we 100% sure Ward’s agent (or wife) did not write this article?

-m

by UTTRmartin on Feb 16, 2010 1:13 PM EST up reply actions  

My thing with Babs was that JR should never of brought him back if he wasnt over what went down with the whole ahl thing. If JR and Babs were putting the past behind them then good, all would be well. But for Babs to put up 19 goals from the blueline with a +15 to go with, then I feel that JR was disrespectful in offering him only 1mil. We agree that his KHL salary is equal to about 3mil NHL, then I believe JR could of kept him for 2mil, NHL money. Babchuk didnt run to the KHL for the same reason others do, like Radulov. Those guys go b/c they’re unhappy with the way their being played/minutes. If it was about money then guys like Babchuk wouldnt ever come over here to begin with. The fact that JR refused to even negotiate with him irks me. Like I said, I believe all sides could be happy with a 2mil salary for him. The way it went down shows me that JR has not let the past go, and therefore I think he “used” Babs, knowing that he wasnt gonna pay him in the end anyways.

by TylerA7707 on Feb 15, 2010 3:56 PM EST reply actions  

That’s a good point you bring up Tyler. I don’t think JR gets enough of the blame for the Babchuk situation. Again, I’m not absolving Babchuk of all responsibility, but JR should get equal billing on this situation IMO.

I’m not certain it would have even taken a 2 million offer. Probably something like a one year deal for 1.5 would have gotten it done so that Babs could be a UFA after this season.

Greensboro was a black hole.

by C-Leaguer on Feb 15, 2010 4:17 PM EST up reply actions  

Your exactly right. I’ve said it before….Babchuk didnt bolt for more money. 19 goals and a +15, and I dont care if it was against lower lines, you gotta offer they guy at least some kinda raise. He left because he was disrespected. To put it in perspective Mike Green leads all DMen with 14 goals at this point. Not saying Babs = Green, but you gotta be crazy to not offer the guy at least a 500k raise, or at least negotiate with him! He made one mistake as a much younger man. Language barrier could very well be part of it when it comes to explaining “cap casualties” and relating to him why he had to go back to the A. Also probably a jackass agent in his ear as other said. I dont hate on Babs, nor do I think hes a “bad personality”. Again, he didnt leave to chase money.

by TylerA7707 on Feb 15, 2010 4:22 PM EST up reply actions  

I gave JR plenty of blame for this one-all summer long.

by EricinSC on Feb 15, 2010 5:56 PM EST up reply actions  

Let him come back he can’t be any wores than A.Ward and he was brought back. Plus we miss his BOMB shot BAD!

Staal + Jussi = GOAL

by canescup on Feb 15, 2010 3:58 PM EST reply actions  

Why can’t A.Ovenchicken go play in the KHL so we might can lead our division once again.

Staal + Jussi = GOAL

by canescup on Feb 15, 2010 4:01 PM EST reply actions  

I think Babchuk was worth more than $1M, but this is how the “Salary Cap” NHL works. The younger guys are going to have a rough time of it (salary wise, unless they are a star) until they get past year 6. The offer to Babs was low, but was rught in terms of the team budget and the collective bargaining agreement.

I don’t feel Babs should come back to this team. I think his rights should be traded and could be used to “sweeten” a deal to get us a valuable asset.

by PackPride17 on Feb 15, 2010 6:25 PM EST via mobile reply actions  

I was hoping for a compromise

I had hoped Babchuk and Rutherford could find a compromise. I still hold out that hope.

Sent via iphone

by abramsdoug on Feb 15, 2010 6:54 PM EST up reply actions  

It was right in terms of team budget because Rutherford had to have available cash to overpay for A.Ward, LaRose, and Cole with.

I’ve seen this time and time again since JR screwed up the Babchuk negotiations…that young RFAs without arbitration rights should only make their QOs. It’s total nonsense if you look around the league and even at the very contracts JR has handed out over the years. Was this some official line given out to explain away lowballing Babchuk? It’s nonsense.

by Kahz on Feb 15, 2010 8:40 PM EST up reply actions  

You can think its nonsense all you want. It is the way that the new CBA works. Look at Chicago – if they didn’t screw up their “QO” to Barker and Versteeg, they would not have been in such cap trouble. But because they messed up, they made higher offers to keep those two players. Don’t you think they would have liked to keep a young D-Man in Barker if at a lower price? The RFA period and QO’s were put in place to help the organizations. You think this is a nonsense excuse, but you obviously don’t know what you are talking about.

By the way, have you ever thought of saying something constructive instead of attacking everybody else’s opinions. You can disagree with others without coming across as a jack*ss.

by PackPride17 on Feb 15, 2010 10:20 PM EST via mobile up reply actions  

The point I’m making is that plenty of RFAs without arbitration rights get contracts above their qualifying offers. I can point to Patrick Eaves, Eric Staal, and Cam Ward on this very team as examples. And just off the top of my head from this summer, I can think of Krejci, Kessel, Dubinsky, Brassard and many, MANY others who got above their QOs.

It’s a nonsense excuse because it assumes that just because a team is only REQUIRED to offer the bare-minimum QO that a player has absolutely no leverage whatsoever. They can always hold out. Or, you know, sign in Russia.

The excuse would only be valid if every RFA without arbitration abilities were playing with their QO. Which isn’t even remotely close to being the case.

It’s nonsense that keeps getting repeated, just like the “Babchuk broke contract by signing in Russia” LIE.

by Kahz on Feb 16, 2010 11:42 AM EST up reply actions  

You are right that some of RFA’s get contracts above their qualifying offers, some get qualifying offers, and some don’t get offers at all. Was the team’s budget the only factor in Babs offer, No! But it was probably a factor and did follow the rules set by the CBA. JR could have offered more, but was not required to. To call it a “nonsense” excuse is ridiculous.

If you like Babs and think he should have been offered a higher contract, fine. All I am saying is JR’s contract offer was acceptable. If Babs didn’t like it, he could go to Russia, hold out, or sign it and play for a better contract.

by PackPride17 on Feb 16, 2010 12:13 PM EST up reply actions  

He could’ve qualified a lot of guys and didn’t: Ruutu, CWard, Staal, for example, all got long-term deals during their RFA period. It’s a matter of deciding who you see as a core player and who you see as a complementary player. Despite his offensive contributions last year, Babchuk was still a third-pairing guy who was a specialty player. There’s value in that, but JR had to determine where his cap money would go. While you may not agree with the LaRose or Cole deals, both come off the books after next year. It doesn’t make sense to sign an RFA for three years unless you’re positive he’s part of your plans — JR wasn’t sure. And based on no team trading for him or giving him a qualifying offer, I’d say he wasn’t the only one with questions about Babchuk’s long-term viability as a top-four NHL defender.

by Cory Lavalette on Feb 15, 2010 11:25 PM EST up reply actions  

No Other Team Rushing In to Obtain Babchuk

   Cory, that is an important and insightful observation. If Babchuk were a no-brainer, teams would be circling around him like sharks in the water. Babchuk’s issues tend to limit how ready other teams were to obtain him. I still think on balance I would try to make things work if I were GM; but the points others have raised are well-taken and cause me concern as well. I think if it were me, I would think to myself that there are no very many 6’5" 220 lbs defensemen with 100 mph shots; and I’d be willing to see if I could figure out a way to nurture Babchuk. Again, I think one of the strengths of the Hurricanes is that the organization goes out of its way to nurture and encourage players. Still, see the note below. If indeed Babchuk is really a prima donna, all bets are off and I’d trade him. I think prima donnas can kill a team crazy fast.

by abramsdoug on Feb 15, 2010 11:48 PM EST up reply actions  

Just to point out: the season after we acquired Ruutu, he was a RFA. JR made a qualifing offer to him and he accepted it. Unlike Babs, he played out the year and was a RFA with arbiration rights. And we all know that Ru got rewarded for his performance with a 3 year contract. If Babs would have played out this year, he would have been able to increase his position in terms of his contract. I not saying that JR has no fault in the matter, but Babs ultimately controls his place in the NHL.

by PackPride17 on Feb 16, 2010 7:59 AM EST up reply actions  

Thank you, because you just proved my point. Ruutu was able to get $2.25M from the Blachawks – well above his qualifying offer – despite not being arbitration eligible.

by Kahz on Feb 16, 2010 11:44 AM EST up reply actions  

And he got that coming off a 15-game season, which followed an entire year without hockey. 15 games played over the previous two seasons and Ruutu is able to secure $2.25M, yet Babchuk “can’t” get more than $1M coming off a solid season in which he actually played? Once again, the “he wasn’t arbitration eligible” argument is proven to be irrelevant.

by Kahz on Feb 16, 2010 11:48 AM EST up reply actions  

Not totally true … he got a two-year deal before the 2006-07 season. First year was worth $1.5M in the first, $2.25M in the second.

He was also considered one of the most talented up-and-coming players in the world — even with the injuries, the second of which was an ankle and not considered a long-term issue — and they were surely protecting him from getting an offer sheet. As mentioned before, Babchuk has not landed an offer sheet.

by Cory Lavalette on Feb 16, 2010 11:54 AM EST up reply actions  

The point remains that Ruutu was able to get significantly above his QO despite not being arbitration eligible.

And Ruutu signed that contract of September 13th, 2006…nearly two and a half months into free agency. There hadn’t been an offer sheet signed in nearly seven years at that point (Vanek and Penner would come a year later). I don’t think he was in danger of signing an offer sheet.

by Kahz on Feb 16, 2010 1:21 PM EST up reply actions  

As mentioned above, Ruutu was a core player in Chicago tho. He was THN top prospect at one point. Babchuk was not deemed a core player by JR & Co. (or anyone else).

Personally, I don’t fault Babchuk — he’s within his rights to leave just like JR was to hold him to his RFA status. But I don’t see how this is all JR’s fault.

(fair pt. on qualifying offers)

by Cory Lavalette on Feb 16, 2010 1:24 PM EST up reply actions  

I get this.

What I’m saying is that people here act like all RFAs that aren’t eligible for arbitration sign for their QOs and thus Babchuk was being completely out of line when demanding more than $1M. People seem to be confusing the fact that all is needed to retain a player’s rights is a QO is the same as having that player play for them. That you are only required to offer a QO doesn’t mean that player has to play for them.

Was Patrick Eaves a core player for this team when he signed a three-year deal at an average of $1.4M, which again was well above his QO despite not being arbitration eligible?

by Kahz on Feb 16, 2010 1:30 PM EST up reply actions  

I can’t speak for everyone here, but I think both Babchuk and JR had their prespective on the situation. Do I think Babchuk was right or wrong, no; but I do believe that he hurt himself more than the Canes organization. Do I think JR was right, no; but what he did was in line with the CBA. Don’t get confused that I’m siding with JR on the situation. I just stating that what he did was in accordance with the CBA and team’s budget.

Qualifiying offers are used to retain a player’s rights while negotiating a new contract. They are also used to retain a player at that salary. It really doesn’t matter what other people were offered, it was what JR offered Babchuk. Like I said, he could have taken the offer and played himself into a new contract or he could go play in the KHL. Both parties in the situation had their objectives and it appears that neither received what they wanted. I think it would be best for the rights to Babchuk be traded to another team, where he might be able to get a fresh start.

by PackPride17 on Feb 16, 2010 3:14 PM EST up reply actions  

Ruutu vs. Babchuk

   I think it ultimately comes down to a point that Cory and others made. Ruutu was extended but at all times he followed the RFA provisions of the CBA. In my view, Jim Rutherford correctly realized that Ruutu was a core player for the Hurricanes who could be part of a team that ultimately will win a Stanley Cup. With regard to Babchuk, it appears that Jim Rutherford’s assessment was that Babchuk was a player who was not essential to the team long-term. That assessment seems to be validated by the lack of a groundswell of effort by other GMS to steal Babchuk.

by abramsdoug on Feb 16, 2010 11:55 AM EST up reply actions  

After we acquired Ruutu in the trade with Chicago, he only got the minimum 10% raise for the following season. After that season, he had arbitration rights and that resulted in his currenty contract.

My point was Ruutu understood the workings of the NHL and CBA and followed it. I believe that Babchuk had every right to want more money and every right to jump to the KHL. But JR had every right to hold firm in his offer to Babs. The GM’s in the league consistently overpay for a player because of one good season. If JR wanted to see if Babs could replicate his success at a lower salary, that is the part of the design of this system.

by PackPride17 on Feb 16, 2010 11:59 AM EST up reply actions  

In other words, Ruutu had an agent that looked after his player’s interest over the long term. My impression has been that Babchuk consistently got very bad advice from his agent. That agent has since been replaced. Maybe his new representation takes a longer term view on the situation. For Babchuk’s sake, whether he is with the Canes or elsewhere, I certainly hope so.

by UTTRmartin on Feb 16, 2010 12:51 PM EST up reply actions  

And my point was that Ruutu didn’t accept his QO two years prior, and instead negotiated for more than two months after the start of free agency to receive a significantly higher contract despite not being arbitration eligible.

There’s no CBA rule that says that players have to accept their QO. People act like Babchuk asking for more than his QO is breaking some rule or having a “bad attitude” when it happens every year with tons of players.

JR had every right to hold firm in his offer. That is indeed true. …And Babchuk had every right to sign in Russia. He was not contractually bound to the Hurricanes.

by Kahz on Feb 16, 2010 1:25 PM EST up reply actions  

I don’t think anybody here believes that all players HAVE to play for their qualifiying offer, but they generally do have to sign them (at least most do, then negotiate). The people that dislike Babs dislike him because of his refusal to go to the minors when needed and THEN refusing to sign an offer sheet. We as fans don’t get the whole story and usually tend to remember the negative ones. So, these two incidents lead the majority of people to believe that Babchuk is a “problem child.” Is he, none of us really know; but things would indicate that he and the organization do not see eye to eye.

You are right that there is no rule the player has to accept his QO, but their is a rule that his rights are owned by the organization until he is released (either through free agency or trade). Babchuk decided to make the situation tougher on himself, whether he was right or wrong. And Babs did have the right to go to the KHL, but he sort of is still contractually bound to the Hurricanes (at least in reference to the NHL).

by PackPride17 on Feb 16, 2010 3:49 PM EST up reply actions  

I have a couple friends who work for the Canes and they DESPISED Babchuk. World-class asshole. Self-absorbed and self-impressed. Not liked in the locker room either.

by DoctorMyBrainHurts on Feb 15, 2010 7:21 PM EST reply actions  

If so that attitude is sufficient reason alone to trade him. The Hurricanes’ strength is the character of each player. Rutherford would know.

Sent by iphone

by abramsdoug on Feb 15, 2010 7:45 PM EST up reply actions  

But I bet they really like Aaron Ward. He’s a great guy and is nice to the staff and well liked in the locker room. Therefore he is…..good? No, wait. What matters is what a player does on the ice.

Babchuk and his “bad attitude” were a HUGE part of us getting into the playoffs last year. Somehow the team was able to overcome his cancerous locker room behavior. Luckily we picked up some popular gritty veterans that could play like garbage on the ice and lead us to 14th in the conference…but hey, at least everybody is happy!

by Kahz on Feb 15, 2010 8:43 PM EST up reply actions  

Chemistry is a part of the equation.

But the reality on Babchuk is that he was a whiny little biotch who took his ball and went home when he didn’t get his way. Not once, but twice.

The first time around, Babchuk had a 2 way contract. When the injured players got healthy that first time around, somebody had to go down. Babchuk was the only option, because he would not have to go through waivers so close to the deadline. Instead of acknowledging that this was the only way for the team to go (without losing a D-Man to waivers), he got his little pink Russian panties in a wad and refused to report to the AHL. I can understand that he felt he was playing better than a couple of guys left on the big squad, but they were not on 2 way contracts, and losing them to the waiver wire for no return hurts the team. Plus, this was an economic decision, not a personal one. All he had to do was go down until somebody was moved, or the deadline passed. But he wasn’t willing to do this. DESPITE THE FACT THAT HE SIGNED THE TWO-WAY CONTRACT KNOWING FULL WELL THAT THE TEAM COULD SEND HIM DOWN AT ANY TIME. So point number one is: If you don’t like the terms, don’t sign the contract. If you do sign a contract, SHUT UP AND HONOR IT! But “Ole Stalker Face” apparently doesn’t believe he has to honor his side of the contract, if he doesn’t want to.

Which brings us to point 2. By putting his ass on his shoulders and not honoring his contract, he hurt the team. He tied management’s hands on possible trades when he refused to report to the AHL and he diminished his own value as a tradeable asset. Obviously, he is not too bright. But, in any event, the CBA basically says that if you pull a stunt like refusing to honor your contract, you lose your leverage. More to the point, he became an RFA, which allows the Canes to make a tender ($1 million) and he pretty much had the option to take it or pack sand. Rather than admit that he was a total selfish choad and take the contract to rehabilitate his piss-poor reputation; he again decided that if he didn’t get WHAT HE WANTED, then he would go play in Russia. Well, good riddance to bad rubbish, as far as I am concerned. Simply put, his troubles are all SELF INFLICTED. So I really don’t care if he ever gets back in the NHL. In fact, I think it’s better to let his sorry ass rot over there in KGB-land as an example to the next guy who thinks he is bigger and/or more important than the rest of the team.

Finally, by the time the playoffs started last year, teams had learned that if you pressured Babchuk just a little, his big shot went away, and he turned the puck over like a madman. The book is now out on him. Could we use a big shot from the point? Yes. But hell, if all we need is a big point shot, we can recycle Jeff Hamilton for less than half of what Babchuk would demand. Or any one of dozens of other “one trick ponies” out there. If the team were to trade his rights and acquire some asset to help this team, then so be it. I can live with that. But if he NEVER graces this team with his cancerous presence again, it’ll still be too soon in my book.

by East of Here on Feb 15, 2010 9:17 PM EST up reply actions  

So what problems did Babchuk’s ‘cancerous presence’ cause the team last season? They made the ECF with him on the team.

And once again: Babchuk NEVER fled to Russia during the season. He ended up reporting to the AHL after a week. Him “fleeing” to Russia was when HE DIDN’T HAVE A CONTRACT. He signed in the KHL during mid-September after two months of negotiating with Rutherford. He had been without a contract for over two months. He didn’t break his contract. Is Seidenberg a “whiny little biotch” because he signed with Florida after not being able to get a contract of his liking from us?

Chemistry is part of the equation? Please tell me how Babchuk ruined the chemistry here last season. I recall them missing the playoffs without Babchuk, then making them with Babchuk. WITH BABCHUK PLAYING A HUGE ROLE DOWN THE STRETCH, I might add.

But you let him go, replace him with a likeable guy with great chemistry in Aaron Ward and the team sucks. If Aaron Ward was here instead of Babchuk last season, I highly doubt we would have made the playoffs despite all the “chemistry” he would bring.

What troubles? Babchuk is playing in his native land for a great team and making more money than he would here. Troubles? No, the only party that had troubles as a result of JR’s lowballing was the Carolina Hurricanes.

Babchuk had already taken the $1M offer from the Hurricanes the season prior to build his “piss-poor reputation”. He then had a great season, posting 16 goals, 35 points and +13. To say that a season like that warrants merely the qualifying offer is delusional. Tons of RFAs get contracts above their QO without having arbitration rights.

“But, in any event, the CBA basically says that if you pull a stunt like refusing to honor your contract, you lose your leverage.”

??? No. It doesn’t. What happened was Babchuk lost a year of NHL service when he elected to sign in Russia, and arbitration eligibility is determined by years of service. It had NOTHING to do with “refusing to honor [his contract]”. And Babchuk signing in Russia was NOT refusing to honor his contract. He didn’t have an NHL contract that season.

by Kahz on Feb 16, 2010 11:31 AM EST up reply actions  

Also, teams never figured Babchuk out. He continued his points and scoring all the way up until the playoffs. Admittedly he did not score in the playoffs, but he continued his standard shots per game and just didn’t happen to make any in. Against Brodeur and Thomas last year I don’t think that is all that bad.
I would also add that not only did Babchuk not seem to fully understand his position, but that the agent he had (and fired when it became obvious the negotiations were not going as expected) did not help his long term prospects.

by EricinSC on Feb 16, 2010 5:32 PM EST up reply actions  

In the playoffs, he was a liability.

Babchuk’s main asset is a big shot. Yes, he had an excellent (scoring) season. And in the playoffs, teams pressured him and he went away. The result was no goals, plenty of turnovers and little impressive defense. The book was out on him. And I readily admit that I do not know everything that went on between Babchuk and his agent. BUT… Babchuk knew full well that refusing to report to Albany was a violation of his contract. And he knew full well that he was very publicly sticking it to the team by doing so. Even if his agent advised him to do that (which I really doubt, because doing so obviously hurts a player’s value and reputation), then he is still an idiot for doing it. The main thing in my mind is that Babchuk made it clear that he puts himself before his team. I don’t care if he had scored 20 goals, I still don’t want players like that on my team.

by East of Here on Feb 16, 2010 11:46 PM EST up reply actions  

@Kahz

First off, you’ll note that nowhere in my post did I say that Babchuk “fled” to Russia during the season. But he did get pissy and refused to report to Albany, which was a violation of his contract. That is a fact. He was not under contract when he went to Russia the following season, but nearly all reports back then were that he did so because he was still unhappy about being sent down (or more generically ‘how he was treated’). And yes, the loss of that year is what cost him his arbitration rights. But he lost that year because he took his ball and went home because he was still mad over being sent down and refusing to report.

As for the Aaron Ward bit, I agree that Ward sucked out loud this year. But to imply that this team would have made the playoffs this year with the simple switch of Babchuk for Ward is just not realistic at all. In case you didn’t notice, the entire team sucked worse than disco for the first 2 months of the season. That includes Cam, Staal, Brindy, Cole, LaRose, etc. Ad infinitum. Babchuk would not have made a significant difference there. And as I said, chemistry is PART of the equation. Not all of it.

As for the Seidenberg analogy, Seidenberg was a UFA. He could do whatever he wanted. Babchuk was an RFA. He could not. That’s apples and oranges. Plus, Seidenberg never took his ball and went home when things didn’t go his way, thus hurting his value or his team.

I also agree that based solely upon Babchuk’s numbers last year, he was worth more than $1 million. But, he blew his arbitration rights by taking his ball and going home because he didn’t get his way the year before. That’s his own fault. JR did not owe him anything other than the QO. So that’s what he got. They then negotiated and he didn’t like whatever JR ultimately offered. So he packed up and went. JR held all the cards there. If Babsy didn’t like that, tough crap. He brought it on himself. Why would any GM make a QO of more than the minimum? Especially on a guy who has already demonstrated that will bolt (or otherwise thumb his nose at the team) if he doesn’t get his way? Apparently no other team wanted him bad enough to make an attractive offer either. Because if they had, I’d be willing to bet that JR would’ve pulled the trigger. My guess is that teams lowballed JR on Babchuk after last year because they knew that Babchuk wanted out and that JR wanted him out too.

People can blame JR and try to whitewash Babchuk’s reputationall they want, but that ignores the fact that Babchuk started the whole mess by violating his contract (not reporting to Albany) and publicly embarrassing this organization. He puts himself ahead of the Hurricanes, and if that’s his attitude, I don’t want him here.

by East of Here on Feb 16, 2010 11:33 PM EST up reply actions  

I have a “couple of friends” who work for HC Avangard. They say Babchuk is a swell guy, always holds open the door for ladies, goes out of his way to help seniors across the street and that he often reminisces about how much he misses Carolina (turns out he loves BBQ) and that he wishes he had listened to better advice over the years.

Give me a break.

-m

by UTTRmartin on Feb 16, 2010 12:58 PM EST up reply actions  

PANTHERS AND BLOWING UP THE TEAM

  Here is a very interesting article about the Panthers.

http://ow.ly/16AC4B

  The tone of the article seems particularly harsh. Taken with the public statements by Panthers’ GM and the letters by the new owners to Panthers’ fans, it looks like a slash and burn approach to the Florida team. Florida has a number of really talented, fast, big forwards and it seems virtually all are available.

   I would be very pleased if the Hurricanes could obtain some of these players from Florida: (1) Nathan Horton; (2) Michael Frolik; (3) Kamil Kreps; (4) Shawn Matthias; (5) Rostislav Olesz. Horton, Frolik, and Kreps have tremendous skill and speed. The Panthers want to blow up their team, and I think the Hurricanes could benefit tremendously from that decision.

   

by abramsdoug on Feb 16, 2010 8:52 AM EST reply actions  

Staying off topic

I honest to god don’t know how Florida isn’t better. All the pieces are there. They should have made the playoffs last year, but flamed out. They should make the playoffs this year, but they’re flaming out. There’s talent there.

Greensboro was a black hole.

by C-Leaguer on Feb 16, 2010 10:14 AM EST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Canes Country, a hockey blog, information hub, and community center for fans of the Carolina Hurricanes.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Small
Call Columbus
Tuomo_twitter_profile_small
Tuomo Ruutu Injured; Expected to Miss Three Weeks
Jeff-eric_small
A little Mo/Kirk Comparison
Ring1_small
My Favorite Picture
Ring1_small
Chad LaRose: A Look At the "Chuck Norris" of Canes Hockey
Small
Looking past the trade deadline. March scheduling.
Statler-and-waldorf02_small
Time for Youngsters to Step Up
Neck_small
Trade Deadline Expectations...
Small
How to Fit Parise and Skinner In to the Budget
297235_228875923843877_197693266962143_697284_1857293148_n_small
Defending the Blue Line Needs Your Vote

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Hockey and Local Twitter

Carolina Hurricanes Roster

# Pos. DOB W H
Bryan Allen 5 D 8/21/1980 226 6-5
Brian Boucher 33 G 1/2/1977 200 6-2
Drayson Bowman 21 C 3/8/1989 190 6-1
Tim Brent 37 C 3/10/1984 188 6-0
Patrick Dwyer 39 RW 6/22/1983 175 5-11
Justin Faulk 28 D 3/20/1992 205 6-0
Tim Gleason 6 D 1/29/1983 217 6-0
Jay Harrison 44 D 11/3/1982 211 6-4
Jussi Jokinen 36 LW 4/1/1983 198 5-11
Derek Joslin 27 D 3/17/1987 210 6-1
Chad LaRose 59 LW 3/27/1982 181 5-10
Jamie McBain 4 D 2/25/1988 200 6-2
Andreas Nodl 14 RW 2/28/1987 196 6-1
Justin Peters 60 G 8/30/1986 205 6-1
Joni Pitkanen 25 D 9/19/1983 210 6-3
Tuomo Ruutu 15 LW 2/16/1983 200 6-0
Jerome Samson 71 RW 9/4/1987 195 6-0
Jeff Skinner 53 RW 5/16/1992 193 5-11
Jaroslav Spacek 8 D 2/11/1974 210 6-0
Eric Staal 12 C 10/29/1984 205 6-4
Anthony Stewart 13 C 1/5/1985 230 6-3
Brandon Sutter 16 C 2/14/1989 183 6-3
Jiri Tlusty 19 C 3/16/1988 209 6-0
Cam Ward 30 G 2/29/1984 185 6-1

More great SB Nation Blogs

Tags


Managing Editor

Cc_shieldjpg_small Bob Wage

Editors

Cc_cory_small Cory Lavalette

95e2a02d-007c-4379-a43d-8331eb2e0d40_small Brian LeBlanc

Contributors

Tuomo_twitter_profile_small Jamie Kellner

75120_1305100992932_1392720706_31336970_7465882_n_small C. Wilson Spiers

293608_10150264887072045_612857044_7969003_540721_n_small Lee Phillips