Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Notre Dame's Turnaround: How Have The Irish Done It?

Should the Hurricanes Re-Sign Scott Walker?

There has been a bit of recent chirping on Twitter about Scott Walker.  The forward was at the Jimmy V event this weekend and seeing him got a few folk wondering if he might be returning to the Carolina Hurricanes next season.  

Much of Walker's last two seasons could probably be described as a disappointment.  He played 41 games in 2008-09 and scored 5 goals with 10 assists.  He did score the huge series clinching OT goal against Boston, but that was his only goal during the playoffs in 18 postseason games.  

Last year he played 33 games with the Canes and scored 3 goals and chipped in 2 assists.  After he was traded to the Caps, he played nine more games and scored 2 goals for them.  He went scoreless in the playoffs in just one game for Washington.

The 37 year old is a very tough competitor who could help out on the fourth line if he is healthy.  The Canes could certainly use his leadership as well as his abilities after he drops the gloves.  On the other hand, his health has been a major concern the past two years and he would be taking a spot away from a younger player.

What do you think?  Should Carolina bring him back into the fold for one more year?

Poll
If the Hurricanes can re-sign Scott Walker for $1 million or less, should they bring him back?
Yes
161 votes
No
322 votes
undecided
36 votes

519 votes | Poll has closed

Comment 55 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Hate to say this, but no, the Canes should not re-sign Walker. He’s a warrior through and through, but I don’t see the role for him on the team this season.

Is it possible to be addicted to hockey?

by C-Leaguer on Aug 23, 2010 12:03 PM EDT reply actions  

NO,NO, NO

The mentality of this team and it’s fans need to STOP GOING BACKWARDS! Once again TURN THE PAGE….

by max creek on Aug 23, 2010 12:06 PM EDT reply actions  

Voted no because NOOOOOOOOOOO wasn’t an option.

by jdboone21 on Aug 23, 2010 12:09 PM EDT reply actions  

Absolutely NOT!

Live & Learn

by Cathye on Aug 23, 2010 12:13 PM EDT reply actions  

I’d much rather they sign a veteran center than a veteran wing. More than anything, I’d like to see JR stand pat and go into camp as is. If an obvious need arises, there will be choices available.

by Cory Lavalette on Aug 23, 2010 12:18 PM EDT reply actions  

Agree completely.

Is it possible to be addicted to hockey?

by C-Leaguer on Aug 23, 2010 1:40 PM EDT up reply actions  

We’re actually heading into camp with spots on the roster for players to compete for, why would we fill a roster spot with a 4th line winger who might be healthy for 20-25 games and <10 minutes a night?

by jdboone21 on Aug 23, 2010 12:20 PM EDT reply actions  

Sounds just like Mo’s kinda guy. He’s old enough, slow enough, and doggoneit, people like him…

it always burns within
the downward spiral never ends
when driven into sin
your salvation's found in a sinner's deed

by Douchebag St John on Aug 23, 2010 12:22 PM EDT up reply actions  

^Stuart Smalley win!

Is it possible to be addicted to hockey?

by C-Leaguer on Aug 23, 2010 1:41 PM EDT up reply actions  

There’s ‘no’ and then there’s ‘Hell no’. This is the latter.

by drifterscape on Aug 23, 2010 12:22 PM EDT reply actions  

Torn...

I’m sort of torn on this, I’m all for the youth movement and can’t wait for it to be here… but I still feel a team to succeed you need role players. Role player could be defined by Walker. He’s always willing to stand up for his teammates, is a reliable 4th liner and has the experience and heart that the young kids need around them.

If they found they wanted to play Matsumoto as the 4th line center, it might be good to have a role player to sit with him on that line. Because lets be honest, most of the youth movement we have doesn’t include 4th liners… which isn’t a bad thing but a team does need it.

The biggest issue with Walker over the past few years is staying healthy. If he was able to and signed for small dollars it might be worth it.

by aphillips on Aug 23, 2010 12:23 PM EDT reply actions  

No, that’s been his biggest issue over his entire career. It’s a huge concern and has played out time and time again. Scott Walker at 500k is a rip-off because you end up paying another 250k for someone else to play the 40 games he misses.

He’s not a role player. He’s a useless player. He doesn’t score, doesn’t kill penalties, rarely fights (and hurts himself doing so half the time) and he is no longer fast enough to hit anyone with any effectiveness. At this point in his career he is a plug whose time in the NHL is done and he shouldn’t be here to take a spot from a young player who may actually have a future in the NHL or at least the ability to not miss 40 games a season.

by Kahz on Aug 23, 2010 12:27 PM EDT up reply actions  

Sign him as a player/coach - for Charlotte

If Scotty wants to play, send him to Charlotte and ask him to teach all of these youngsters how to play – between him and “the scoring machine” Jeff Daniels (back in the 01-02 season that was a banner in 328), they can help get these kids ready.

Either that, or convert him back to defense, and he can be the puck handling defenseman that Rutherford covets so much.

Seriously, Scotty, I like you a lot, but go back to Nashville, and have your 24 put up in the rafters at Bridgestone Arena. You’ve earned it.

by jbwhite99 on Aug 23, 2010 12:31 PM EDT reply actions  

Sending him to Charlotte as a coach is an interesting idea. He’s got the kind of mindset and dedication you’d like to instill in your players.

Is it possible to be addicted to hockey?

by C-Leaguer on Aug 23, 2010 1:42 PM EDT up reply actions  

He’s got the kind of mindset and dedication you’d like to instill in your players.

This is about the only reason I can think of for so many people voting yes.

Scott Walker at any price is not a fit for the Canes as a player. Great character guy so I would not be opposed to him being involved with the organization somehow, but I don’t see him fitting in what I hope to be the Canes’ plan for this season and the future.

by Iggy Reilly on Aug 23, 2010 1:55 PM EDT up reply actions  

I would agree

with the player/coach idea, but would the team owner in Charlotte go fo it ? would JD & Gordi go for it ?

And if it Aint Hockey,It Aint Nothin !!
That Checkers 3rd Sweater ROCKS !!!

by CaniacSteve on Aug 23, 2010 2:57 PM EDT up reply actions  

Go with youth

This is not the time to add another old, injury-prone player, even at a bargain price. I like Scott Walker, but signing him makes no sense for the Canes this season. With Cole, Kostopolous and Samsonov plus the young vets like Staal, Ruutu and Jokinen, there are plenty of veterans to break in the kids. Adding vets in the twilight of their career will delay sunrise in Carolina.

If anything, the Canes should trade some of the vets already on the roster to make room for young talent. I don’t mind keeping Kostopoulos to play with two kids on the fourth line. TK is well worth what he’s paid and I don’t see any of the kids replacing his grit.

by curiouscanesfan on Aug 23, 2010 12:31 PM EDT reply actions  

While i too

Voted NO, i see,understand and appriciate aphillips post…persoanlly ithink walks ought to let his agent go as the biggest issue for scotty is and has been his health..not trying to short sheet the guy, but if scotty can have a st down one on one alone with JR and plead his case of say a 2 year deal…@ 850,000.00 with the undertanding that he is on a preformance probation meaning that IF the goals they set down together don’t happen…then at the trade deadline they package him with someone else & off he goes or at the end of the season he gets cut loose…but if does do and preform well and is healthy then the second & final year can be for the 1 mill but the same provisions to apply to the last season (2010/2011) or the man id cut loose…surely there is a way to do that with in the CBA or a PTO even…but other than that…I don’t realistically see JRsigning Walker to even a deputy assistant equipment managers posistion…but hell JR can and has done weird things before huh ? I wish all the best for scotty & his wife…

And if it Aint Hockey,It Aint Nothin !!
That Checkers 3rd Sweater ROCKS !!!

by CaniacSteve on Aug 23, 2010 12:35 PM EDT reply actions  

?????

A two-year deal for Scott Walker?! At $850,000 and $1M?

????

Oh, and who is going to take Scott Walker with another year left on his deal at $1M if he doesn’t meet the agreed upon goals?

Oh, and why in the world would we need Scott Walker’s permission to trade him after giving him such a generous and totally unwarranted contract. Are you suggesting a NTC to go with a massive overpayment for an old, injury prone 4th liner?

?????

I don’t know what to say.

Help.

by Kahz on Aug 23, 2010 12:39 PM EDT up reply actions  

Sorry Steve, this one is WAAAAAY out there…your wife slipped you a “Roofie”

by max creek on Aug 23, 2010 12:59 PM EDT up reply actions  

ok ok ok

ok kahz & max…i see your point…and you’re right too much …but seeing Chip over the N&O just posted a side bar on the canes now blog about Tlutsi he made mention that JR said there was NO room for scotty on the team…and no my wife & i are way too old to get a "mickey’ slipped in my sweet tea

but thanks for the encouragement max…hehehe…

And if it Aint Hockey,It Aint Nothin !!
That Checkers 3rd Sweater ROCKS !!!

by CaniacSteve on Aug 23, 2010 3:02 PM EDT up reply actions  

I love Walks, but it’s the kids’ turn. Rather see Bowman or Samson or Osala, etc. out there.

www.prosportsblogging.com

by Great Ice-Pectations on Aug 23, 2010 12:35 PM EDT reply actions  

Scott Walker has fought five times over the past two seasons, which includes a preseason fight and a postseason fight. That means he’s fought three times in 83 regular season games over the last two years.

Did I mention that he got hurt in two of the five fights? One fight every twenty games or so, with a 40% rate of knocking himself out of the lineup as a result. Sorry, but “abilities after he drops the gloves” doesn’t seem to apply anymore with him. It’s like saying Aaron Ward has goal scoring abilities.

by Kahz on Aug 23, 2010 12:36 PM EDT reply actions  

ALL THE YES VOTERS....

Apparently the YES voters have no reasoning to vote yes other than their hearts….

by max creek on Aug 23, 2010 1:16 PM EDT reply actions  

….or the fact that their browser rendered a “most certainly not” over the “yes” button.

by spagett! on Aug 24, 2010 5:29 PM EDT up reply actions  

What is with this disrespect towards Scott Walker? Sure, the man is 37 years old and no one will argue that his best days are behind him. But in effect calling him an “old, washed up slow hasbeen” is incredibly shallow for a heart and soul player that always brought more to the team than statistics show.

It really is amazing some of you on this blog – I just don’t get it. I must live in a wind tunnel or something, or I must see things completely different when I watch a Canes game. I can’t stand Joni Pitkanen – the kid gives away hockey games left and right and no one seems to see it. Sergei Samsonov – the biggest waste of money since Sandis Ozolinsh. How many more 20-point seasons before we cut this guy loose? And it seems most here think he’s a top 6 player. I’ve been a fan of this team since the beginning (a transplanted Sabres fan since 1986) and, although it may be a little “homerish” on the part of Jim Rutherford, signing Walker to a minimum one year deal puts a pretty nice topper on the offseason.

You can never have enough leadership on a team, ESPECIALLY one that figures to be as young as this one. Frankly, I’d rather see Osala, Matsumoto, Samson, or whoever would be “losing a roster spot” get a full year in Charlotte and have Walker teach our young ones something about heart and soul – two things you cannot quantify by looking at stats.

I voted yes to bring back Scott Walker, and I hope JR signs him before the start of camp.

by Thomas Gidlow on Aug 23, 2010 2:11 PM EDT reply actions  

I am pretty sure there is going to be enough heart to go around on this team….I suppose you also wanted Brindy back for another season… The constant injuries alone warrant a no…. he is not getting any younger but this team is. Being a realist is certainly not disrespect!

by max creek on Aug 23, 2010 2:25 PM EDT up reply actions  

Of course there is heart, but you cannot say there isn’t disrespect towards him. It’s amazing that we laud these guys when they are contributing, but when they start winding it down it’s “he’s old, worn out, can’t do it anymore, just quit”. Just now, another comment below stating “(Walker) needs a walker to get up and down the ice…” – just total disrespect.

Being a realist is fine, just do it respectfully. The man plays a rough style of game, and no doubt his body is punished for it. I’m sorry – I just don’t see why a one year, league minimum or thereabouts contract is such a waste, according to most here.

I didn’t want Brindy back for another year – I wanted Brindy to do what he felt best for himself. I don’t think he could have come back as a player, at least not here. They came to an amicable arrangement and that’s that. What does that have to do with Walker?

by Thomas Gidlow on Aug 23, 2010 2:50 PM EDT up reply actions  

I actually think Brindy would be better for the team than Walker. Brindy could at least play the fourth line center position. If Walker were to come back I don’t know where he would fit in. Not really a prototypical fourth line penalty killer that the Canes like. Not good enough to be in the top 9 any longer.

Is it possible to be addicted to hockey?

by C-Leaguer on Aug 23, 2010 3:32 PM EDT up reply actions  

He’s a old, slow, washed up has been. Every player stops being useful at some point in time. That time has clearly come for Scott Walker. Not wanting a player back because they are terrible is not being disrespectful. Putting a player on the ice who clearly has lost it “just because” is being disrespectful for his teammates and fans. One could easily claim that you are being “disrspectful” for expressing your opinion towards Pitkanen and Samsonov, but that would be ridiculous as it would fail to address the points you raise.

Osala, Matsumoto and Samson get a full year in Charlotte? You do you realize that they’ve already played 2, 4 and 3 full years in the AHL? The time is getting close to now or never for them…but if they’re good enough, we should just throw a 37-year old with no future and questionable current abilities in their spot so he can…do, what exactly? Provide “leadership”? Why not sign Francis to a contract? He’d probably suck horrendously (oh, wait, is that being disrespectful to note that a formerly great player would no longer be able to play effectively in his late 40s?) but he’d provide leadership or something

by Kahz on Aug 23, 2010 8:39 PM EDT up reply actions  

Walker and Skill

  Walker is many things, but slow is not one of them. I agree it is time to let the young prospects play and that it would be a mistake to re-sign Walker. I think Walker’s main issue is injuries. He has given all he has for so many years, his body is paying a huge toll. I do think, however, Walker could help some NHL team with his grit, but as Jim Rutherford said about Walker, there is no space for him at Carolina.

by abramsdoug on Aug 23, 2010 10:09 PM EDT up reply actions  

I dunno, I almost wish there was a who cares option. Go look at the depth chart up on Caneshockey.com. We were a non playoff team last year, and there is not a single face on this roster ( minus rookies) who were not here last year. Not a single new player, who isn’t looking to make their first full year in the bigs. This season ends much the same as last year, if not worse.

by wylde4canes on Aug 23, 2010 2:18 PM EDT reply actions  

5 games in the bigs with the Rags…….

by wylde4canes on Aug 23, 2010 3:53 PM EDT up reply actions  

Scott Walker...

…needs a walker to get up and down the ice nowadays. No way he gets re-signed.

by Capt. Stinky on Aug 23, 2010 2:44 PM EDT reply actions  

you guys say what you want.

We may not need him, may not have a place for him, but we have no one that brings what he did. I hope he hangs them up rather than disgracing himself and dragging it on for too long. But he played hard every game, every shift, not just when wearing a Canada jersey. My profile pic says it all. my .02

by xlwino on Aug 23, 2010 2:57 PM EDT reply actions  

Just Say No

Even though I made a theoretical argument on The Fourth Line thread on Scott Walker’s behalf, it was only if he was considered to be a replacement for a traded Kostopoulos, arguing that they were essentially the same player, but that a league-minimum one-year contract saved money and freed up a fourth-line roster spot a season earlier.

To add Scott Walker to the roster now is the very situation that JR said in this interview thread that he was not going to create this off-season.

The temptation is surely there, but good on JR to resist.

And, from this Canes Now blog entry, it looks like he’s manfully resisting:

Rutherford again said he does not anticipate the Canes adding any other players, saying the competition for spots, especially among the younger guys, will be beneficial. He said he has spoken with the agent of forward Scott Walker but does not anticipate bringing back the veteran forward, an unrestricted free agent.

“We like him a lot,” Rutherford said. “We do not have room right now.”

Here we are now...entertain us.

by Elsker on Aug 23, 2010 3:11 PM EDT reply actions  

In particular, this quotation from that July 26th interview that JR gave to TWC14 is germane:

But, I am going to be very careful with those three or four spots that are kind of open now, up front on the forwards. Because we’ve taken the time to develop young players. We’ve told them that they’re going to have a good opportunity to be on this team. And if I go out now and sign one or two free agents, even if it’s at a bargain price, because of where we’re at in free agency, I don’t think it’s fair to the players that we’re developing.

Here we are now...entertain us.

by Elsker on Aug 23, 2010 3:20 PM EDT up reply actions  

+24 :-)

I just hate it when you are so right & on target Elsker…you and even Capt. Stinky ( but don’t tell him i said that) do assist in help keeping us focused !! time to go and finsh watch Cavuto…be safe

And if it Aint Hockey,It Aint Nothin !!
That Checkers 3rd Sweater ROCKS !!!

by CaniacSteve on Aug 23, 2010 4:37 PM EDT up reply actions  

Thanks for finding and posting that quote from Jim Rutherford. It seems to me the Canes Organization has a plan in place in terms of creating a organization that has the depth in the pipeline to be a consistent playoff team. I know it is hard for Jim Rutherford not to re-sign Walker because Walker has done so much for the organization; but realistically, the organization made a commitment to the younger players that they would be given their chances to prove themselves in 2010-2011; and it would be the entirely wrong message to bring in a fourth line player like Walker.

by abramsdoug on Aug 23, 2010 10:56 PM EDT up reply actions  

Love the guy

but he doesn’t have a spot on this team.

Tempis fugit is a Latin term that is most often translated as “time flies,” but I feel a more literal translation is “time is a fugitive.” Time escapes us. We all chase it, but it is just out of our reach. Scott Walker has been a solid hockey player, a great part of the locker room, and has some shining moments in a Canes jersey. He has overcome personal adversity and he punched Aaron Ward IN THE FACE. I’d love to buy him a beer.

For the 10-11 Canes, he does not fit the roster. I hope he gets an opportunity to play the game he clearly loves, and I wish him all the success in the world.

by Gillimus on Aug 23, 2010 6:55 PM EDT reply actions  

Nope

Would rather they try and sign James Neal from Dallas – at least float him an offer sheet.

by rsmithcp on Aug 23, 2010 7:18 PM EDT reply actions  

Yes

And not ashamed.
The dude’s a beast. I would have bought out Samsonov back whenever, then picked up Walker. Makes much more sense for the 4th line.
I know there’s a youth movement and all, but meh.

by Caniac1026 on Aug 23, 2010 9:00 PM EDT reply actions  

I voted no. I like Walker, and admire him, but there is no place for him. He would take a slot that a younger player would fill (on the roster,not necessarily talent-wise). He is injury prone, and he brings the same sort of things as Tom K but not at the same level. The Canes would be better served by moving out (trade?) some vets rather than adding another one.

by ncyankee on Aug 23, 2010 10:48 PM EDT reply actions  

Walker is one hell of a teammate, someone who would stick up for others; but it would be idiotic to resign him. The kids need those lower roster spots to prove themselves and gain experience to become the new generation. The answer to this question is a BIG NO!

The only way I would do this is to trade Harrison and make Scotty our 7th defenseman. :)

Triple Gold Juice - It's Potent and Guaranteed to Help You Score!

by PackPride17 on Aug 23, 2010 10:50 PM EDT via mobile reply actions  

still would not do this because of the injury liability…

by max creek on Aug 24, 2010 7:44 PM EDT up reply actions  

Should the 'Canes resign Scotty Walker?

In short, no

In long, NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!

by Kubota on Aug 23, 2010 11:11 PM EDT reply actions  

to clarify

I love Scotty, he was great for us when he was able to play, but he doesn’t fit with this team.

by Kubota on Aug 23, 2010 11:13 PM EDT up reply actions  

Scott Walke Appreciation Night

   At some point in the near future a Scott Walker Appreciation Night at the RBC would be great. One last chance to cheer for Walker and let him know how much he meant to Caniacs.

by abramsdoug on Aug 23, 2010 11:13 PM EDT up reply actions  

Also it’s time to let someone go off to pasture without all the frickin pomp and circumstance….These “Appreciation nights” are getting a bit redundant.

by max creek on Aug 24, 2010 7:39 PM EDT up reply actions  

Which “Appreciation Nights” did you attend at the RBC that you felt were redundant and not earned?

by abramsdoug on Aug 24, 2010 9:36 PM EDT up reply actions  

All of them, not really a pass me a kleenex kind of guy….it is a sport, thanks for your service move on.

by max creek on Aug 25, 2010 2:46 PM EDT up reply actions  

I could not disagree with you more, and based on the energy in the RBC I think your position is in the vast minority.

by abramsdoug on Aug 28, 2010 9:25 AM EDT up reply actions  

i say yes,
the heart and experience and voice would be a great help to this young team

"a bit of love"

by chrisj on Aug 23, 2010 11:15 PM EDT reply actions  

Super Eric, Rosey, Cole, Gleason and having Brindy around ALL trump signing an aged injury prone player for a voice…..

by max creek on Aug 24, 2010 7:56 PM EDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Canes Country, a hockey blog, information hub, and community center for fans of the Carolina Hurricanes.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Small
Call Columbus
Tuomo_twitter_profile_small
Tuomo Ruutu Injured; Expected to Miss Three Weeks
Jeff-eric_small
A little Mo/Kirk Comparison
Ring1_small
My Favorite Picture
Ring1_small
Chad LaRose: A Look At the "Chuck Norris" of Canes Hockey
Small
Looking past the trade deadline. March scheduling.
Statler-and-waldorf02_small
Time for Youngsters to Step Up
Neck_small
Trade Deadline Expectations...
Small
How to Fit Parise and Skinner In to the Budget
297235_228875923843877_197693266962143_697284_1857293148_n_small
Defending the Blue Line Needs Your Vote

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Hockey and Local Twitter

Carolina Hurricanes Roster

# Pos. DOB W H
Bryan Allen 5 D 8/21/1980 226 6-5
Brian Boucher 33 G 1/2/1977 200 6-2
Drayson Bowman 21 C 3/8/1989 190 6-1
Tim Brent 37 C 3/10/1984 188 6-0
Patrick Dwyer 39 RW 6/22/1983 175 5-11
Justin Faulk 28 D 3/20/1992 205 6-0
Tim Gleason 6 D 1/29/1983 217 6-0
Jay Harrison 44 D 11/3/1982 211 6-4
Jussi Jokinen 36 LW 4/1/1983 198 5-11
Derek Joslin 27 D 3/17/1987 210 6-1
Chad LaRose 59 LW 3/27/1982 181 5-10
Jamie McBain 4 D 2/25/1988 200 6-2
Andreas Nodl 14 RW 2/28/1987 196 6-1
Justin Peters 60 G 8/30/1986 205 6-1
Joni Pitkanen 25 D 9/19/1983 210 6-3
Tuomo Ruutu 15 LW 2/16/1983 200 6-0
Jerome Samson 71 RW 9/4/1987 195 6-0
Jeff Skinner 53 RW 5/16/1992 193 5-11
Jaroslav Spacek 8 D 2/11/1974 210 6-0
Eric Staal 12 C 10/29/1984 205 6-4
Anthony Stewart 13 C 1/5/1985 230 6-3
Brandon Sutter 16 C 2/14/1989 183 6-3
Jiri Tlusty 19 C 3/16/1988 209 6-0
Cam Ward 30 G 2/29/1984 185 6-1

More great SB Nation Blogs

Tags


Managing Editor

Cc_shieldjpg_small Bob Wage

Editors

Cc_cory_small Cory Lavalette

95e2a02d-007c-4379-a43d-8331eb2e0d40_small Brian LeBlanc

Contributors

Tuomo_twitter_profile_small Jamie Kellner

75120_1305100992932_1392720706_31336970_7465882_n_small C. Wilson Spiers

293608_10150264887072045_612857044_7969003_540721_n_small Lee Phillips