2009-10 Canes Country Exit Analysis: Brett Carson
Of all the young players who were called up from the Albany River Rats this year, Brett Carson was the only defenseman who stuck for the duration. Called up in December when Joe Corvo's lower leg was slashed by a skate, that marked the last time the Albany fans saw this 6'-4" 24-year-old from Saskatchewan. By April, Carson had 54 NHL games on his resume, with a respectable plus/minus of +5. Though certainly a defense-first player, here's one of the sweeter moments of his season, from a game during the Canes' run in March, a late goal to tie it up against the Caps. (The Canes won in OT that night, 4-3.)
Always humble and soft spoken, he quietly established himself as a reliable and responsible worker with size and skating ability. Many Canes fans were troubled when the team decided not to make a qualifying offer to Carson (as a RFA) in June and he went out on the free-agent market. And the corresponding cheers were heard when Carson was re-signed two weeks ago, with a league-minimum contract that provides a two-way option if assigned to play with the AHL affiliate in Charlotte. However, Hurricanes' GM Jim Rutherford made it clear that he will be reluctant to expose Carson to the risk associated with waivers:
"He’s going to play a lot of the season, or all of the season, with the Hurricanes," said Rutherford.
After the jump a look back at what the rookie accomplished for the Hurricanes this past season.
First, the numbers. Missing from these stats are the average ice time of 17:22/game, meaning he wasn't perpetually at the bottom as a third pairing either. After Tim Gleason couldn't play with a broken bone in his foot in March, Coach Paul Maurice had Carson on the ice an average of 20:17 the last 10 games of the season.
Also take note Carson was called for only six minor penalties in 54 games, the best PIM per game of all Hurricanes blue-liners not named McBain (who took no penalties in only 14 games). That seems to confirm the perception that Carson can skate to stay in position and uses his body, not his hands and stick illegally, to defend the zone.
Because of his quiet "Western Canadian farmboy" personality, we didn't hear much from Carson off the ice this year. It looks like he'll be with us for much of 2010-11, so I've got his exit interview from April, with his repetitive focus on working hard and developing his game and with it, the confidence that he belonged in the NHL. Is this a preview of the mood we can expect for the 2010-11 season with so many other young players working to stay in Raleigh?
The Good: In April, Canes Country's readers voted Carson as the team's Rookie of the Year. Coming in at a very difficult time in the room, as the Hurricanes were struggling to crawl back from the horror show that was the first 2 months of the 2009-10 season, Carson was part of the infusion of youth that changed the chemistry and saw that amazing run in January and February that had a lot of us sipping the kool-aid.
It's always difficult to find stats that quantify the value of "stay-at-home" defensemen, but I wanted to find some evidence that, now in hindsight, might confirm the perception that Carson is worthy of the fans (and Rutherford's) confidence.
- Carson was plus/minus of +1 for December and January and +4 for March and April. That's definitely going in the right direction, and over the season may be the most important stat to look at.
- Carson blocked 89 shots in his 54 games which, at 1.65 B/S per game, is better than Niclas Wallin (1.45) or Jay Harrison (1.21), though not quite up there with "broken foot" Gleason (1.86) or Aaron Ward (2.03)
- For hits credited to defensemen, Carson's sheet lists 77 on the season, or 1.43 hits/game. Except for Joni Pitkanen (.93) and Joe Corvo (.56), all others showed bigger numbers. Specifically: Harrison - 1.76, Gleason - 2.44, and Andrew Alberts with a whopping 2.87. In isolation this is not the best way to analyze a hockey player, but I still found it interesting to see what he is and isn't doing out there.
- Returning to the penalty stat, I ran some numbers considering Time-on-ice and only counting the minor penalties. Carson was near the least penalized with Corvo; both were called for about one minor only once for every eight times of "twenty-minutes played" (for three D-pairings, twenty minutes would be one game) - so let's say one minor/eight games. Tim Gleason was next lowest at one minor penalty for 4.6 games. Pitkanen got 2 minutes for every 2.7 games, and A.Ward shows up at one trip to the sin bin for every 2.0 games played.
The Bad: It wasn't all sunshine and roses, and there was one particular OT goal in Tampa that may well haunt Carson for awhile. When the Canes were still mathematically in the playoff race in March and needed every point, Martin St. Louis showed some high-skill veteran moves and made Carson look every bit the rookie he was. Shall we chalk it up as a "lesson learned"? Afterward, goalie Manny Legace also took some of the blame for not stopping the puck, but still:
As Carson was quoted in the N&O's recap
"We battled and I got beat in overtime," Carson said. "It's obviously disappointing. ... I made a bad mistake in OT and it cost us an extra point."
The Money: Last season, Carson also had a two-way contract, at the NHL level earning $522,500, according to capgeek.com. As we discussed when the signing was announced last month, he will earn less than that for 2010-11, with a contract of just $500,000 this year.
To see the previous 2009-10 Exit Analyses click here.
Time to grade Carson. Given this mix of information on his performance and your expectations,
23 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I was very happy with Brett, he didn’t play many bad games (if any) and was the model for consistency.
+1… I was about in shock when they were just going to let him walk away. Very glad he decided to re-sign with us, can’t ask for much more from a guy like him. Although from recent interviews, JR seems to be hesitant about the Sanguinetti situation. Seems like he knows we have too many decent D for too few spots, it would be a shame to see Sanguinetti put by the wayside. The only D we have with real value though is Pitkanen (assuming they would never trade Gleason and McBain due to how valuable/cheap they are), wonder how things pan out.
I was also worried we might lose Carson. Glad we didn’t.
Now about Sanguinetti: He fell out of favor in NY after allegedly showing up for training camp out of shape. He has played a total of 5 NHL games. I know he’s a first round pick and all, but before we talk about making room for him on the NHL roster, lets first have him prove he belongs here. He has only played two seasons (150) games in the AHL. Spending another year there while getting a few call-ups is not going to hurt him.
Sanguinetti
I watched Sanguinetti this year both in his short stint with the NHL and in the AHL. He is the real deal in the same way it was obvious McBain was the real deal. I also believe Carson is clearly an NHL quality defenseman. Sanguinetti was not so much out of shape as he didn’t come to camp ready to suffer through Torts’ boot camp – an old school run the players into the ground camp. It was naive not to take Torts’ blustering seriously, but Sanguinetti never got out of the doghouse. Torts will carry grudges to his grave – for good or bad that is just how he operates. I will be surprised if Sanguinetti doesn’t earn a spot out of camp. I suspect Harrison will be spending time down in Albany, despite his one-way contract and the risk of Harrison being taken on waivers.
I agree, I really hope he gets a fair shot. I also hope Harrison is as good as gone similar to the Conboy situation last year. We still have 7 Dmen that deserve top-6 time, maybe injuries will clear things up but I think Sanguinetti will probably be considered the 7th D going into the season.
Gleason – Corvo
Pitkanen – Babchuk
McBain – Carson
Sanguinetti
In the end I think someone will have to be moved… I can’t see anyone I think would be better off in Charlotte. Personally I wouldn’t be at all against playing 11 forwards and 7 D each game though.
It’s kind of nice to go from wondering if the Canes would be able to come up with more than four NHL defensemen to thinking they’ve got seven who shouldn’t be sent to Charlotte.
by curiouscanesfan on Aug 6, 2010 3:24 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
he did what was asked of him last year
this year he can build upon that by being a more physical defencemen.
let the other teams players know that when they have the puck they’re going to get hit and
get hit hard too!
none of this soft stuff down low.
by the way we never should have signed babs
but hopefully we’ll trade him for cash or a player to be named later
Don't be so sure...
When Babs has another strong year scoring goals you might change your tune…!!
Carson was very solid and has plenty of potential
I gave Carson an A in terms of playing the way the Hurricanes need him to play on a consistent basis. If he were 28, I would have given him a B; but given his limited previous NHL experience, he was extremely solid and almost without fail made good choices with the puck in his zone. I also thought he had good positioning in sealing the crease (unlike A. Ward) and had quick hands and reactions (unlike Wallin). I was very, very pleased he was re-signed. I think he had a great future with the Hurricanes.
I gave him a B. He came in at a bad time, and played respectably. As you say, it’s hard to statistically prove a defense first defenseman, but I thought he was a victim of rookie mistakes on occassion. It may be that his future is tied to achieving a rapport with another defenseman (a la Corvo-Gleason) so that the pair transcends the individuals.
B+
I still don’t get why Harrison was signed before Carson, though it’s good to have another defensive d-man. He just seemed like a stabilizing presence on the back line and he was consistent throughout. I was very relieved when JR re-signed him.
He's a solid B+
Very glad we retained him, but this is just the sort of thing that drives me crazy about the Canes. I would really like to seem him paired with Borer, but first things first!
B
Solid B considering his lack of experience and salary level. I like how he seemed to improve as the year went on. This is a guy with a room to grow and a high watchability factor on an otherwise average team.
Avery Solid B++
And it is sad in a way that JR gave /offered him the min. (500,000.)after all what could he have asked for that Jr let him walk for a bit ? Or was it Agent greed in the name of doing the best i can for my players crap…i would have gladly given him a raise to 575,000.on a 2 way…but I really don’t think he’’ll go or stay in Charlotte long if at all…40 2 days until training camp and watch the fur fly folks…for those of you who can & do get to go and watch…I envy you…
And if it Aint Hockey,It Aint Nothin !!
That Checkers 3rd Sweater ROCKS !!!
PSS
Thanks HM2 some how you found the time to do yet again some amazing work here…
And if it Aint Hockey,It Aint Nothin !!
That Checkers 3rd Sweater ROCKS !!!
B
I wanted to give him an A but I’ve had a hard time giving anyone on the team that high a grade after this past season. Really looking forward to him with a season under his belt now and knowing what to expect.
If I were JR I would be locking Carson up for a while. We need some big bodied defensive D-men. We have plenty of the puck-moving and offensive D-men with Corvo, McBain, Babchuk and Sanguinetti. Gleason and Pitkanen are the only two other defenseman other than Carson that I really feel comfortable on the back end defending (Pitkanen’s defense is very underrated IMO).
Carson, McBain, Sanguinetti, Dumoulin, and Gleason is really good D-corps going forward in the future. I would love to have Pitkanen hang around the most but I get the feeling we won’t be able to afford him.
Yeah, well, you know, that's just like, uh, your opinion, man.
Huh??
I’ve heard that b4, and it makes NO SENSE!! why would JR pinch pennies with the best Dman we have? Did he try to stiff Staal, or Ward? NO!! he gave them BIG contracts! …yet some people ASSUME he’ll treat Pitkanen different. Where’s the logic in that?? IF and it’s ONLY IF they need to save money, they’ll most certainly start somewhere else!
They are going to make a lot of decisions about the defense looking at it long term…
1) McBain is a long term top-4 D for the Canes
2) Corvo was signed 2 years, Babchuk for 1 year, and Carson for 1 year (RFA after)
3) Gleason is signed for another 2 years (I’m thinking the Canes will re-sign him)
4) Sanguinetti was acquired and has long-term top-4 potential (at least top-6 as a PP specialist) for cheap
5) Brian Dumoulin looks to be a very solid Defensive long term top-4 D (at least top-6)
6) Justin Faulk is an explosive offensive D that looks to have long term top-4 potential and really wants to be in the NHL
7) Mark Alt in the pipeline as well, we will get a better read on his potential next year
Not saying they should dump Pitkanen, I think he is worth every penny of $6-6.5 million, but I’m sure all these things will be on JR’s mind going into negotiations.
Never said I wanted them ship Pitakanen out. Hell, I’d take him over any Dman we got other than Gleason. I just don’t have the most confidence that the Canes will match the money that other teams will be throwing at him. I certainly hope I am wrong though.
Yeah, well, you know, that's just like, uh, your opinion, man.

by 




















