Five Observations: Hurricanes At Rangers
For the second straight game, the Carolina Hurricanes rallied in the third period to force overtime, only to fall in the extra session, losing 2-1 to the Rangers at Madison Square Garden. Unlike Monday's loss to Florida where the Canes seemed uninspired for the majority of the game, Wednesday's game turned into a goaltending duel between two of hockey's top netminders. Here are five observations from the overtime loss to the Rangers.
1. Cam Ward and Henrik Lundqvist traded remarkable saves throughout the game, going into the third period scoreless before New York finally punched in the night's first tally. Carolina was able to respond, giving each team a much-deserved point before the Rangers nabbed the extra one in overtime. It was a matchup of two goalies jockeying for a spot in the All-Star Game, and their numbers are remarkably similar. Both goalies have 17 wins (Ward: 17-1-5; Lundqvist: 17-12-3) and are among the league leaders in save percentage (Ward: .925; Lundqvist: .923). Lundqvist holds an edge in goals-against average (2.34 to 2.55), but Ward has made 159 more saves in 87 more minutes. Lundqvist is also tied for the league lead in shutouts with five.
The problem both might have in punching their ticket to Raleigh's midseason showcase is the NHL's edict that each team be represented in the All-Star Game. That could give an edge to Florida's Tomas Vokoun or St. Louis' Jaroslav Halak, whose teams lack another solid candidate for inclusion. Eric Staal will definitely make the team for Carolina, and brother Marc is a possibility for the Blueshirts. It would be a shame if either or both of Ward and Lundqvist, who are the primary reason for their teams still being in the playoff push at the midway point, were not part of the festivities at the end of the month.
2. Despite the salary cap, there is still a significant gap between the NHL's haves and have-nots. That was illustrated Wednesday when one of the league's premier franchises hosted small-market Carolina. Not only are the Rangers pushed tight against the salary ceiling, but they have nearly $9 million being paid out to Wade Redden and Todd White without it costing them a dime against the cap. On top of assigning those two to the AHL to make room, the Rangers (like Toronto) have been able to lure undrafted players to the Big Apple with money and the glitz and glamor of New York City. The Canes have their share of undrafted players in Carolina (Chad LaRose) or their system (Jerome Samson), but those players were/have been brought along slowly and were initially signed without fanfare. New York won a bidding war for undrafted college standout Matt Gilroy prior to the 2009-10 season, then signed Olympic standout Mats Zuccarello-Aasen (now just Zuccarello) prior to this campaign, and both were able to reach the NHL in their first pro season and are on the ledger for $2.1 million and $900,000, respectively, when in the NHL this season. That's a $3 million chance teams like Carolina cannot afford to take — and one New York used to get their only two goals in a win.
3. On the game's first goal, Brandon Dubinsky won a battle in the corner with Joe Corvo to feed Gilroy for the point shot that beat Ward. It wasn't Corvo losing the battle that was disheartening, but rather that he was caught posturing for the officials when he lost his stick during the sequence. Corvo's was slow to recover his stick and therefore was just getting to the right of the net when Gilroy’s shot beat Ward. The concern wasn't so much that Corvo was caught on one play, but that he is an emotional and streaky player and in the past he has been prone to getting down on his game after even just one mistake. So if was good to see Corvo quickly redeem himself by getting a shot through to Lundqvist five minutes later that Staal deposited for the tying score.
4. Speaking of that goal, Carolina's captain once again came through when they needed him most. On an extra shift centering Jeff Skinner and Tuomo Ruutu, Staal won the faceoff then crashed the net, beating brother Marc to the rebound and slamming home the goal that would force overtime. It was his 19th goal, which ranks him seventh in the NHL, and his 39 points are tied for 15th in the league. Staal has also improved dramatically in the faceoff circle, upping his percentage to 45.2 after getting off to a terrible start (along with the rest of the Canes). That still ranks him in the league's bottom 10, but when you dig the kind of hole Staal did at the beginning of the year, it takes a while to climb out of it.
5. Paul Maurice continued to juggle his lines, not only moving players up and down but switching Ruutu back to center and Skinner to wing. Staal opened the game with Brandon Sutter and Patrick Dwyer, but spent the majority of his time with Erik Cole and Zach Boychuk. The captain also spent time with members of the fourth line and, as mentioned above, double-shifted with other duos. Maurice has said he would move Staal around to get him the best matchup and switch up who plays center based on the opponent, but one has to wonder if doing so — specifically the latter — is a case of Maurice letting his opponents dictate how the game will be played rather than trying to find the identity he's said the team needs to locate. While the Canes undoubtedly need energy to compete each night, chemistry also goes a long way.
65 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Observation 1: The Goalie Duel
Could just be my biased eyes, but to me the quality of the Ranger’s scoring chances were much greater than ours.
Despite playing as positionally sound and as calmly as I’ve seen him (usually very good signs for a high-save-percentage game for him), Cam was having to make highlight reel saves to stop point-blank shots courtesy of our leaky D.
Meanwhile, to me, Lundquist was simply making routine stops on shots from well out and no where near the slot.
Big difference in performances, to me, despite both goalies having similar save percentages last night.
Here we are now...entertain us.
Outside of the goal, Lundqvist had great rebound control last night. He made a great save on Skinner’s punch chance when it was scoreless, and I thought overall was very good. Better than Ward? Probably not, despite giving up one fewer. But that was definitely a goaltender’s duel.
by Cory Lavalette on Jan 6, 2011 1:09 PM EST up reply actions
Elsker I felt the same way in the moment watching the game. Not to take anything away from Lunqvist but it felt like every shot Cam faced was from point blank range. I’d love to see one of those handy-dandy shot chart graphics to see how close I am to reality.
Phoblographer and Finn Aficionado
SISU
by Jamie Kellner on Jan 6, 2011 2:13 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
http://www.nhl.com/ice/icetracker.htm?id=2010020591
But it’s worth noting that two of the three goals came from plays that started with outside shots.
by Cory Lavalette on Jan 6, 2011 2:29 PM EST up reply actions
That shot that Corvo put on Lundqvist from the blue line for Staal’s goal was a thing of beauty. Nice and low, which is why it thumped off his pads and out Staal’s way for his goal-scoring lunge.
It was akin to golf, where you can have a good round if you can actually put two good shots back-to-back at times. We did four good things on that play: won the draw (Staal, although not cleanly), scrambled and got the puck back to the D-man in the corner (Gleason), nice little pass over Corvo’s way, and the low shot through traffic on goal for the juicy rebound.
Here we are now...entertain us.
I totally agree about the Rangers scoring chances. There was more than one puck that slid in front of the goal that, luckily, no ranger touched. They had a couple of easy goals go by the wayside because of that.
Not that the hurricanes didnt make some opportunity, but overall new york played better.
I am not a heavy drinker. I can sometimes go for hours without touching a drop --Noel Coward
by DaveLovesBier on Jan 6, 2011 5:20 PM EST up reply actions
Observation 2: Money Talks
Going young (and affordable) is our only chance in the financial realities of the NHL. Despite good attempts to narrow the differences between the haves and have nots on the revenue side, the differences are still there and will probably always be there.
We’re going to be outspent by the major market teams, at least until we turn into one a generation from now. So, drafting smartly, and sometimes trading when the asset is prime, is the only sustainable path.
Fortunately, the school of hard knocks (and a bit of mentoring from Marshall Johnston) has us on that path.
Here we are now...entertain us.
If the cap rises as much as predicted next season. I think you’ll start seeing even more difference between the “big money” teams and the “low budget” teams. I’m really hoping that the NBA goes on strike and the NHL is able to capitalize on that with a much better TV deal. Increased exposure is always good, but additional revenue coming from a better TV deal could really help the Canes out.
Staal, Skinner, and ?; almost a NHL level 1st line!
It wasn’t Corvo losing the battle that was disheartening, but rather that he was caught posturing for the officials when he lost his stick during the sequence. Corvo’s was slow to recover his stick and therefore was just getting to the right of the net when Gilroy’s shot beat Ward.
I was noticing this and was hoping players would take that as an example to stop postuering for an official. If it’s already called a penalty there’s no use dropping the stick. The official can’t take it back. If it’s not called a penalty then keep playing. Taking yourself out of the play has to be the worst idea ever. I’d like to see all players recognize this and stop this terrible stick dropping postuering.
Don't trust me. I have psychological issues.
The other problem this caused was that Dwyer had to come down low to cover Corvo’s position while he whined in the corner. Boychuk was already low, being the weak side winger. Sutter was slightly low because he had to cover for Dwyer. If Dwyer didn’t need to cover for Corvo, he could have gone higher, so Sutter wouldn’t have had to come lower, so he may have been able to get to the point man before he shot.
A lot of speculation, but Sutter almost made it to the point shot. Being slightly higher would probably have prevented a goal.
thats what i said last night!! PLAY HARD UNTIL THE WHISTLE BLOWS
Mi piace l'hockey su ghiaccio.
l'hockey è buono qui .. sì?
That first Rangers' goal
Funny how the overtime GW goal erased my recollection of that first goal. Now that you’ve reminded us, Cory, I think that goal was the killer. It was Dubinsky fighting hard and winning the puck battle, but also Corvo leaving the Canes shorthanded without leaving for the penalty box. There was no margin for error and that error was big. The Canes should have won in regulation 1-0.
The GW goal in overtime was Dubinsky getting past McBain, taking out Gleason with a fine block, and bumping Cam Ward while Zuccarrello skated free. At least McBain and Gleason put up a fight.
Both goals show how hard it can be for the Canes D to deal with a big, physical forward.
Halak is in the Western Conference, so I don’t think his inclusion in the All Star Game would be at the expense of Ward or Henrik.
Maurice was clearly trying to get Erik away from brother Marc. I have no real issue witjh that as NY did a real good job at deflecting much of our offense to the perimiters. That tactic ended up getting us that one point.
Conferences don’t matter this year. They’re doing the fantasy draft to pick teams.
by Cory Lavalette on Jan 6, 2011 3:45 PM EST up reply actions
Cam ASG
Wouldn’t Cam benefit more by having a few days off? I agree with everyone that he is worthy of All Star consideration, however with him seeing most of the action between the pipes for the ‘Canes and the frenetic pace he is on, wouldn’t time off benefit the team more?
Shoot the puck!!!!!!
Not like he’d have to do a lot of traveling for this year’s ASG. He could still sleep in his own bed. It’s clearly a goal of his … even more confidence can’t hurt.
by Cory Lavalette on Jan 6, 2011 4:17 PM EST up reply actions
Thank You Cory
and for the record i do agree with much of what you said…but what bothers this fan is the “inconsistancy” of the team over all…asside from Ward, Staal,Boychuck,Gleason,Skinner & Ruutu…that leaves 14 other players to step it up a notch or 3 …as i have stated in a post from yesterday…If i was the GM or the/a couch of the Canes…I would remind them that the teams paroll is X amount of millions of dollars and I’d expect them to play as if they were writting the checks…so they’d be even more motivated but seeing like all of us here I’m a fan but this hot one day or game and luke warm for 2-4 the next…will not get the Canes into the playoffs let alone into a SCF round…
Thanks again Cory…catch ya later…
The moment you write off the Hurricanes,
they make you look bad !!
While there are many things that could improve about last night’s game; I was entertained. Whether it was Cam stopping some amazing shot or Staal diving into Henrik to score the goal. As compared to the 2-1 OT loss to Dallas in December, which I thought was a complete horsesh*t game out of both teams; this one seemed to me as a real goaltender battle.
I think if we can build on this game and get the offense kicked into gear, we should have a more positive result in Florida on Friday.
Staal, Skinner, and ?; almost a NHL level 1st line!
Off Subject
Has anyone else seen the sick video of Sid Crosby doing the stick handling and shooting tricks at www.nhl.com?
In one video he picks off pucks stacked in a pyramid one at a time and then one actually rolls down the boards and he takes a wrister from about 25 feet and nails it….really sick
Shoot the puck!!!!!!
I thought whoever picked him up would only owe half? Not so?
by curiouscanesfan on Jan 6, 2011 6:49 PM EST up reply actions
Half in the sense that nearly half the season is over… Yes. Columbus has already paid him for the games up to this point.
But you may be thinking of re-entry waivers. If a player is put on waivers a second time (after clearing the 1st time) then the previous team has to pay half the player’s salary for the length of the contract. Commodore is on primary waivers right now.
If they are that desperate to get rid of him, putting him on waivers a second time may not be a surprise. I doubt anyone will take him as he is at $3.8 million. And Columbus is a small market, and I doubt they will want to make that much for the next few years.
Assuming a team picks them up, they are only going to pay 1/4 of the salary this year (Columbus paid 1/2 already, then re-entry so they have to pay 1/2 anyway). Then next year the acquiring team would only pay around $1.75 million. I would take that the opportunity presents itself.
The other team pays half for the remainder of the contract. The Stars are still paying Avery.
it always burns within
the downward spiral never ends
when driven into sin
your salvation's found in a sinner's deed
by Douchebag St John on Jan 6, 2011 7:12 PM EST up reply actions
I was confusing this situation with re-entry waivers. Damn.
by curiouscanesfan on Jan 6, 2011 7:14 PM EST up reply actions
True, but the real kicker is that he has two more years on his contract after this one, $3.5M next year and $3.35M the year after that.
He comes with a heavy ball and chain. We all thought at the time that contact was signed that Columbus had lost their mind.
Something very good has to happen for us in addition to Commie for this deal to go down…not that such a sweetner could not be found, mind you.
Here we are now...entertain us.
Either way, I don’t see JR pulling the trigger as much of a recycler he is … we would pretty much have to trade Commie for Joni (as far as cap space goes) and I’m not sure JR’s willing to do that.
I think the idea would be (as Elsker pointed out to me before) that acquiring Commodore through waivers would allow us to easily ship out Joni at the deadline.
I don’t think it will happen though, mainly because Commodore doesn’t exactly have a place on the team moving forward.
True, but if we don’t plan on keeping him or Pits after this year … you’ll have McBain with another year, Gleason, Corvo, White (possibly), Carson and another D-man as your 6.
Mike Commodore is a fine player and great team guy and I enjoyed him while he was here and I follow him on twitter.
That being said, I just don’t see him being the future of this hockey club.
Watch me eat my words.
Phoblographer and Finn Aficionado
SISU
by Jamie Kellner on Jan 6, 2011 7:43 PM EST up reply actions
No, you’re right; he not part of the future of this team. But JR does have some weird disorder of re-acquiring players that he didn’t resign for a reason.
Staal, Skinner, and ?; almost a NHL level 1st line!
by PackPride17 on Jan 6, 2011 8:06 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
for some reason i am thinking alphabits cereal...
or the soup
Mi piace l'hockey su ghiaccio.
l'hockey è buono qui .. sì?
Can we please not? He’s overpaid and has been terrible for the last year and a half. Cup or none, sweet gingerfro or none, Commy is just not worth the contract Columbus signed him to.
by Sluv on Jan 6, 2011 8:27 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
I just read Crosby will not be in the lineup tonight versus the Habs. Just what we need! Take freakin’ games off against us, not the team we’re chasing for 8th!
Staal, Skinner, and ?; almost a NHL level 1st line!
by PackPride17 on Jan 6, 2011 5:45 PM EST via mobile reply actions
And just another reason to hate Cindy & Sh*tburgh! I can’t believe they lost to Montreal in OT. That is exactly what we don’t need. The 1st place team in the East losing to the team we’re chasing.
Staal, Skinner, and ?; almost a NHL level 1st line!
by PackPride17 on Jan 6, 2011 10:18 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
Yeah, hate all over Sidney Crosby for getting hit by David Steckel in the Winter Classic and getting a concussion.
Phoblographer and Finn Aficionado
SISU
by Jamie Kellner on Jan 6, 2011 11:20 PM EST up reply actions
Oops, in an effort to be fair and balanced I am also hearing that the concussion was not a result of the Winter Classic hit but more likely when Victor Hedman boarded him in the TBL game.
Phoblographer and Finn Aficionado
SISU
by Jamie Kellner on Jan 6, 2011 11:27 PM EST up reply actions
Is there some site that lists that? People always seem to know whose scouts are where… This certainly doesn’t make sense from an upcoming game perspective (we don’t play Toronto till late January).
It was tweeted by someone at the game … unfortunately, I don’t know of a site, but it would certainly help!!
Could be for potential trades…
I hope it isn’t anyone from Toronto, there isn’t a player they have that I personally think fills our needs.
St. Louis has a great group of young players that I really like, but I doubt they would be available for anything short of a very big trade (Pitkanen or prospects involved). TJ Oshie, Patrick Berglund, and David Perron are all very skilled, young, and hardworking forwards. Berglund specifically (6’4", 215 lbs) is coming off a pretty bad year and may be available as a pending RFA. He had an amazing Rookie year (47 points) and has 1st line potential.
St. Louis also has some great defenders. Alex Pietrangelo and Erik Johnson are both future #1 D (although acquiring one would be very, very expensive). Both are extremely good with high potential. Roman Polak and Ian Cole are two other more stay-at-home young RFA’s that would be of interest, however neither look to be much more than 3rd pairing guys.
The problem with the St. Louis idea is that they’re 8th in their conference, so you’d assume that they would be buyers … does that make us sellers?? Isn’t it pretty rare to make an ‘even’ trade like that at the deadline between two contenders?
If the trade benefits both teams and is fair, then the teams will probably go for it. If they can both improve, then why not?
I completely agree with you, I just haven’t heard many trades in the past few years where both teams were ‘buyers.’ Then again, I’ve been wrong plenty of times before :)
The Canes need to be sellers regardless of their Playoff position. Management has already called this year a rebuilding year and it is certainly that, there is absolutely no way (short of Cam shutting out the other team 4 series in a row) that we will take home a Cup this year.
Build the pieces for the future… The Canes need to be willing to spend the money for a 1st line Winger + another top-4 D. We have the Cap space to compete, just not the budget.
That Pietrangelo is going to be a star! I would trade Pitkanen for him in a heartbeat. He’s not at Pits level now, but he will be. We would also have him for the next 5+ seasons, since this is the first year of him entry level deal. If we are going with a youth movement, might as well build around a potential all-around defenseman like that.
Also, I just read that Peters will get the start tomorrow in Florida.
Staal, Skinner, and ?; almost a NHL level 1st line!
by PackPride17 on Jan 6, 2011 10:14 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
I think it would take Pitkanen + either Boychuk/Dalpe before St. Louis even began to listen to an offer for Pietrangelo. If it was me making the decision, I’d still consider it.
He is indeed a freaking monster, going to be a future Star.
I was thinking they would need something else also, but based on their recent performance, I wouldn’t give up Boychuk or Dalpe. The Canes are going to need some scorers and beyond Staal & Skinner, they don’t really have any. I would include one of the other prospect though or even Tlusty.
Staal, Skinner, and ?; almost a NHL level 1st line!
by PackPride17 on Jan 6, 2011 10:35 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
How about Tlusty?
And throw in someone in Charlotte that might be NHL at some 4th line level, but will never reasonably find such a role with us?
Several someones, if necessary.
Here we are now...entertain us.
If I was STL, I wouldn’t give him up for anyone short of a superstar. Pitkanen, Tlusty, and one higher up prospect in Charlotte that will never really be an important aspect of this team (Samson?) is more than fair, but I don’t think they will part with Pietrangelo. I know I wouldn’t give up Ward for that.
Trade value’s not my thing, so I hear you.
I think JR’s just philosophically accepted long ago that we’re never going to be able to afford a true #1 here, anyway.
Unless he snags a young RFA for minimal pain, he’ll spend his limited D budget on Gleason/Corvo/White level defenders for the top 4.
Maybe McBain will live up to our heavy expectations.
Here we are now...entertain us.
I should also mention… I have said a couple times that Adam Larsson is signed next year in the SEL and I was mistaken. He will in all likelihood be in the NHL next year.
Also, apparently the word is that Larsson is slightly regressing this year instead of improving (or that he has largely already reached his potential). He is certainly still the best D in the Draft and is the most NHL ready, but this feeling might drop his Draft status a few pegs. Maybe this plays into our favor come Draft day? Someone had mentioned it earlier, but maybe this makes a deal such as Toronto’s 1st (from Boston) for Pitkanen + our 1st. more likely. Especially with Toronto’s improved play lately, it might be a deal Boston is more likely to make pre-trade deadline.
It brings me no pleasure...
…to say this but other than the two goalies and maybe the two Staals, I thought Avery was probably the next best player on the ice. His play led to some pretty good scoring chances for NY’s fourth line.
by Sluv on Jan 6, 2011 8:33 PM EST via mobile reply actions

by 



















