Game Analysis: Hurricanes At Devils
The Carolina Hurricanes losing streak reached three games after the team allowed another late-game goal. Adam Henrique scored the game-winner with 3:29 remaining to give New Jersey a 3-2 win over the Canes. The Hurricanes now stand at 5-7-3 and their 13 points ties them with Winnipeg for 11th in the Eastern Conference.
Three Observations
1. Having a successful shutdown line is a great thing, but Brandon Sutter's scoring prowess is wasting away in such a capacity. Rod Brind'Amour was able to win two Selke Trophies while still getting ample offensive opportunities both on the power play and at even strength. The solution? Try Chad LaRose as the third line center. Moving LaRose to the middle would allow Maurice to slot Jussi Jokinen on Eric Staal's wing and then Sutter could perhaps be paired with Jeff Skinner on the second line. Tuomo Ruutu could join Staal and Jokinen, while Zach Boychuk or Zac Dalpe could provide more punch on the right side with Sutter and Skinner. LaRose could be joined by Patrick Dwyer and Jiri Tlusty — sounds like a checking line, right? — and you could fill out the lineup around Tim Brent on the fourth line.
2. Carolina was murdered in the faceoff circle Tuesday, winning just 18 of 56 draws, including a clean loss by Sutter in the third period that led to Petr Sykora's goal that made the game 2-1. Believe it or not, Staal — who has a history of ineptitude at the dot — has been the beacon of hope for the Canes on faceoffs, and last night was no different. He won eight of 17 (47 percent) and was the only Carolina player to crack 30 percent other than Dwyer, who went 1 for 1. It's Brent who has been the most disappointing, winning just 40.2 percent of his faceoffs on the year.
3. The Hurricanes allowed two more goals in the third period, pushing their league-worst total to 20 goals given up in the final frame. The team has been outscored 20-15 in third periods and 17-10 in the second, while scoring 12 goals to their opponents' 10 in the first period.
Number To Know
3 — Fights for Carolina this season, and none since a frustrated Boston squad initiated two brawls on Oct. 18. Needless fighting doesn't solve a team's problems, but an occasional dropping of the gloves has been known to fire up a team. Remember Doug Weight fighting Jeff Halpern in 2006? The Hurricanes have been willing to stand up for their teammates, but there comes a time when a fight can swing a team's fortunes.
Plus
Zach Boychuk — The former first rounder got his first point of the season Tuesday — a secondary assist on Joni Pitkanen's third period tying goal to get the Canes back in the game — to help justify his current spot in the top nine. While one point in almost 100 minutes of ice time does not jump off the page, Boychuk has been Carolina's most energetic forward of late.
Minus
Tim Brent — Carolina's fourth line center has been, as mentioned above, disappointing on faceoffs (one win in five draws Tuesday) and also turned the puck over on what turned into Dainius Zubrus' redirection goal in the second period to tie the game at 1. Brent lost the faceoff, then failed to get his clearing attempt past defenseman Bryce Salvador. He then slid to block Salvador's pending shot, but the New Jersey defenseman instead found a passing lane to Patrik Elias because Brent was on the ice. Elias fired the puck cross-ice to Anton Volchenkov, whose shot was deflected by Zubrus for the tying goal.
27 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
so
staal-jokinen-rutuu
sutter-rutuu-boychuk
larose-tlusty-dwyer
brent-poni-stewart
thats an odd looking 4th line. but i think i could get down with this….
"a bit of love"
I thought we played with heart. Staal looked engaged. Seems like the little things are hurting us. But then again, Jersey could say the same thing about their 20 shots that hit the goal posts. Is it just me or does it appear that Kaberle is always one step behind everyone else on the ice? And McBain….he is being ordered to pinch. Has to be. It is so reckless and comes at such odd moments that there is no other explanation for it. Mo is telling him to jump up. Has to be – and against the Caps he got caught out. Last night I don’t remember him getting burned but I cringed a couple times in anticipation.
chrisj, cuz Skinner is sitting for Jarko.
Haha.. it does look like we picked Jarko up according to Chrisj
by RobbinDollar on Nov 9, 2011 12:54 PM EST up reply actions
trade for checking center
Moving sutter has been something I’ve wanted to see. Trade a dman for a checking defensive center. Could set lines like so
Tripe S. Staal- Skinner- Sutter
Ruu- Boychuk – jussi
Center- tlusty- larose
Brent- Dwyer – Stewart
Or more logical
Staal Skinner jussi
Sutter Ruu Boychuk
Center tlusty larose
Brent Dwyer Stewart
by jerry6racing on Nov 9, 2011 1:18 PM EST via mobile reply actions
I think he’d be a nice fit and I could live with giving up McBain for him. He’d be nice as a 3rd line centerman, can center the 2nd PP unit, and is good in shootout; plus he’s only 22 – he’s been in the NHL for 4 seasons.
Well you know the saying about giving up something good to get something good. I’d hate to see Jamie go but from a depth perspective Faulk is waiting in the wings and Joslin will get out of the press box.
I dont really see the point in starting to develop d-men, and then moving them out, unless you pick them purely for trade bait. Carson pretty much got let go by putting him on waivers when they did, didn’t he have an up and coming skill set they were developing?
McBain had almost as many points last year as Pitkanen, but still needs some defensive work. What do you get with Faulk later? Another undeveloped d-man to just trade away after you use him as filler for a season or two?
I guess if that’s the strategy behind picking up defense prospects then….ok?
I am not a heavy drinker. I can sometimes go for hours without touching a drop --Noel Coward
by DaveLovesBier on Nov 9, 2011 4:45 PM EST up reply actions
Time to pony up and admit it, JR...
You overpaid for Kaberle and need to get rid of him. :(
Ready for the Canes to win the Cup again! :)
Related
The Washington Capitals were put through a bag skate today. This is because they lost the last two games by scores of 5-3 and 5-2 (this game to the Stars). Boudreau did not like their effort in the third period of either game. These are the same Capitals who are 9-4-0 and 3rd in the Conference.
Meanwhile at the Hurricanes practice, Maurice says things might be changed.
Well, he will tinker with lines
it’s all he knows how to do. Remember, he said he has no idea what to do now……
Sutter
I think Sutter should center the 1st line. I also liked Tlusty with Staal.
Sutter – Tlusty – Staal
Ruutu – Skinner – Jokinen
Dalpe – Ponikarovsky – Boychuk
Brent – Dwyer – Stewart/LaRose
Healty Scratch: Stewart/LaRose
Tlusty also played well with Sutter, which is another argument for Sutter Tlusty Staal. I would love to see those lines. I would rather see LaRose or Dwyer scratched. They seem to be Mo’s two favorite players though. They’re valuable role players but the Canes don’t need them both.
by curiouscanesfan on Nov 9, 2011 8:08 PM EST up reply actions
I keep on seeing everybody wanting Sutter to center Staal. Well, Staal has been better in the faceoff circle. What about Staal centering Sutter?
It's time for change! "If you want to change the culture, you will have to start by changing the organization." - Mary Douglas
While I’m not among those who thinks Staal should move to wing, I would definitely say there’s more to playing center than taking faceoffs. One expends more energy at C b/c you have defensive responsibilities on the entire ice as a center.
by Cory Lavalette on Nov 10, 2011 2:56 PM EST up reply actions
But wouldn’t having Sutter on the wing be more beneficial to our offense? It would allow him more opportunities for breakaways and all of his goals this season have come on breakaways. I think his speed and his ability to get to that top gear so quickly would be more beneficial on the wing at the present time.
If a breakaway were to occur, who would you rather have taking the shot?
It's time for change! "If you want to change the culture, you will have to start by changing the organization." - Mary Douglas
I can’t see moving a guy to wing under the idea that he’ll possibly get more breakaways. If anything, centers get more breakaways b/c they’re in the middle of the ice and a blocked shot can get them moving.
by Cory Lavalette on Nov 10, 2011 3:22 PM EST up reply actions
Faceoffs aside, I wouldn’t mind seeing Staal on a wing with a strong player at center. Until recently Sutter’s FO stats looked better than Staal’s, I think. Two strong FO guys on a line can’t be all bad either..
Until recently Sutter’s FO stats looked better than Staal’s, I think
Actually Staal was 4% better than Sutter last season.
It's time for change! "If you want to change the culture, you will have to start by changing the organization." - Mary Douglas

by 























