2010-11 Canes Country Exit Analysis: Tuomo Ruutu
The last twelve months have been pretty darn good if your name is Tuomo Ruutu.
After losing a significant portion of the 2009-10 season to a shoulder injury and subsequent surgery, Ruutu hit the 2010-11 season with a purpose. He hosted his teammates and hundreds of traveling Canes fans in his home country for the season openers against the Minnesota Wild in Helsinki, Finland. He completed all 82 games and posted career highs in assists, points, and hits.
When the Hurricanes' season ended abruptly in April, Ruutu returned to represent his country as alternate captain for Team Finland in the IIHF World Championships and was rewarded with a gold medal, his country's first in sixteen years. He's a recently married man, and apparently when his hockey career is over, he has a burgeoning career ahead as a saxophone player. Or a gladiator (more on that later).
So how did the hard-charging Finn fare for the 2010-11 season, and what can he do for an encore next season?
The Good
"Johnny what do you mean I "LOOK" like a gladiator?"
Ruutu has been known as a steady and consistent performer throughout his Canes career, and that trend continued in 2010-11 with some positive uptick. Since joining the squad in February 2008 he has never averaged less than .65 points per game (that's an 82-game pace of 53 points). Last season's 57 points was a career high, as was his 38 assists. He was ranked third on the team in points, just behind his frequent linemate Jeff Skinner, with whom he developed a solid chemistry. He also ranked third in power play goals, and fifth in power play points.
In addition to consistency, Ruutu was also relied upon for his versatility. Early in the season he was approached by the coaching staff to move from wing to center, and it was an opportunity he approached with great enthusiasm as our own Bob Wage reported when they spoke back in October.
Ruutu certainly likes the new responsibility and his face lit up when I asked him about it.
"It's a different mind set, to be honest, and more responsibility in my own zone, but I am learning the position and it will get better."
I asked him if it affected the physical aspect of his game. "It changes some things obviously, with my responsibilities down low, I'm no longer the first one on the forecheck. But at the same time, you can finish your checks in your own end."
During exit interviews he mentioned how he felt playing center gave him an advantage because it helped him skate into the neutral zone with more speed, although he also acknowledged he has work to do in the faceoff circle (more on that later). With lines remaining somewhat to be determined going into the new season, Ruutu's continued development in the center role will surely remain a topic of much discussion and debate.
No assessment of Tuomo Ruutu would be complete without a nod to his ability to separate player from puck. His 309 hits (one glass-shattering) blew away his previous NHL career high of 228 and ranked second best in the NHL. Despite the increase in his already strong physical style of play, he was eighth on the team in penalty minutes. He served substantially less time in the box per game played than in previous seasons (almost 1/3 less penalty minutes per game played), a sign perhaps of maturity in his physical role, along with improved decision-making.
While Ruutu's best game statistically was against the Devils on New Years Day, where he tallied a goal and three assists, probably his most memorable performance came against the Florida Panthers on December 15, 2010. Down 3-0 early in the first period, the Canes rallied and Tuomo scored two third period goals within a minute and a half to tie the game and then win it, earning a new nickname in his "gladiator" post-game interview (seen here courtesy of RacoonFink).
The Bad
41.2%. If your role is in the faceoff circle, that's a dismal statistic. Ruutu was third on the Hurricanes squad in terms of faceoffs taken, but ranked seventh in faceoff wins. Out of the top 100 NHL players in number of faceoff draws, Ruutu ranked 98th in win percentage. On a squad that is not known for overall faceoff prowess, this is an area that he must improve if he remains at the center position.
While Ruutu's assists and total points were high, his goal production was down from years past (19 compared to a career high 26 in 2008-09). His scoring touch remained solid with a 12.8% shooting percentage, but he took about 20% less shots per game than in previous seasons. Whether this is a trend or cause for concern remains to be seen, but given the increase in his assist totals, it could be a sign of better on-ice vision and decision-making.
The Money
Ruutu just completed his second year of a three-year contract, making $4m in salary with a $3.8m cap hit. He is due to earn $4.4m in the last year of his contract and will be an Unrestricted Free Agent at the end of the 2011-12 season.
54 comments
|
1 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Whoever voted F is seriously watching someone else. Maybe they were thinking Jarkko? Jeez.
Dude is a rock. Give him credit. Best year of his career, IMO.
A.
"...they will not force us...they will stop degrading us...they will not control us...we will be victorious..."
Mah blog.
Was wondering that myself.
"...they will not force us...they will stop degrading us...they will not control us...we will be victorious..."
They probably thought the ‘F’ stood for “Finn-tastic!”
Phoblographer
by Jamie Kellner on Aug 1, 2011 9:04 PM EDT up reply actions
Hal Gill?
Advance apologies if the contents of this sports-based post offended you. I'm just aiming to educate the masses. My law professor says they're asses.
Panthers '010: Save the Richardson family coffers! We'll take the winning if we stumble into it.
by MichaelProcton on Aug 2, 2011 2:31 PM EDT up reply actions
Ruutu: A+
Ruutu had an outstanding year, I think. For me, Ruutu is as critical to the Hurricanes future as Ward, Staal, and Skinner. There are a group of untouchables, and however that list is defined as far as I am concerned Ruutu is in that group of essential Canes players.
Ruutu did have one, if not his best, year’s in the NHL; but I find it very difficult giving him an A+ like you AD. I still think he should be a 20+ goal scorer if he plays 70+ games and he has only done that in 1 season.
Here's the SKINNy, the All-STAAL game was CAMtastic!
That’s like asking how many of Cole’s assists were on Staal’s goals… Assists are assists. But it probably explains why he shot less—he had what he considered a better shooter in Skinner so as a center he passed him the puck. If he can still dish the puck but also work on shooting more himself (he’s always had a very good shooting percentage, just not shooting enough) he will really be a top notch asset.
You can’t ask more of a player than Ruutu gives. There’s no replacement on the horizon, nobody at all like him coming up through the ranks.
If the Canes must divide their players into a core and transients, Ruutu belongs in the core.
by curiouscanesfan on Aug 1, 2011 4:27 PM EDT up reply actions
Solid B for this past year
Did whatever he was told, no complaints. Had sniffs of being top line type of forward, still waiting for him to take that last step to premier player. Tough as nails. Should have breakout 2011-2012 season.
Of Maurice, Karmanos said: "I’m happy Paul is back but he’s going to be judged the same way as any other coach. We need to win more consistently."
by Sergeant Stinky on Aug 1, 2011 12:06 PM EDT reply actions
B
So far, no mentions of Sauna Island (sorry Tripp). Would have voted A except the faceoff percentage, and wish he could have done more later in the season to take pressure off of Skinner
Understand the lack of A for face-off percentage, but he hasn’t played Center so didn’t have years to work on it. No Center starts in the NHL with winning percentage until they learn and work on it. Bet he’ll be better this year. But he did all we could have asked of him and was one of our better and more consistent forwards. Easy A for me overlooking/understanding the Face-off issue.
Face-offs after shoulder surgery
It isn’t as if Ruutu began the season at full upper body strength. He had significant shoulder issues that resulted in surgery if I recall correctly. So here is a player put on the second line as a center not having played center for the Hurricanes; and he excels. I’d hate to have some of these kind folks at Canes Country grading my bar exam. Tough crowd to say the least.
Gave him an A
I teetered between an A and a B, but in the end, the fact that Tuumo makes such an impact in every game, even if it isn’t on the scoreboard, swayed me to an A. But he’s got to improve in faceoffs.
I see that Brent Burns has signed a contract extension with San Jose for $5.76 million a season over 5 years. He’s a good defenseman, but is he really worth that much? The man is not exactly a model of health and his best statistical season was last year (equal to Joni’s best season). Either JR is just an excellent contract negotiator or other GM’s are going to eventually force the NHL into another lockout. I’m not a huge Joni fan, but Wiz and Burns are equal or less than Joni IMO and both get over $1 million more a season than Joni. I guess this is just how a free market society works; you’re worth what some idiot will pay and eventually the fans will have to foot the bill for increases to ticket prices or taxpayers will have to pay for a new arena with additional revenue streams.
Here's the SKINNy, the All-STAAL game was CAMtastic!
I’d take Burns at that money. I didn’t watch a lot of him last year, but I remember how miserable he made things for the Canes in those 2 opening games. What’s not to like about this guy? 6’5 220, can play big minutes, very tough to play against, big shot, etc. Plus, you know what you’re going to get out of him every night.
He’s not a bad player at all, but the guy has some injury concerns. By comparison, Joni has averaged 0.53 PPG and a +5 over his NHL career and make $4.5 million. Burns has averaged 0.40 PPG and a -21 over his NHL carrier and will make $1.26 million more than Joni. Hell, even Wisniewski has averaged more than Burns (0.45 PPG and a +5) over his playing career. While Burns has a better shot, is he that much better than Pitkanen? Burns IMO is probably a $4 to $5 million dollar defenseman and every little bit over he gets will eventually trickle down to other players and in the end will effect teams like Carolina.
Here's the SKINNy, the All-STAAL game was CAMtastic!
He’s not a bad player at all, but the guy has some injury concerns
As does Pitkanen.
I’m reluctant to compare the 2, Burns is closer to a Pronger type of dmen and plays a shut-down role 1st. I realize his +/- is -10 on a non-playoff team vs -2 for Joni, but we don’t send Joni to shut guys down – Gleason & Corvo have had that job. Burns will be a great addition to that team: Burns-Boyle, Demers-Vlasic, and Murray-Vandermeer, most fans would be ok with that dcore. If he stays healthy, he’s worth every penny.
Like I said, he’s not a bad player; I really wouldn’t mind him on the Canes. I just disagree with you that he is worth every penny. San Jose’s blog is very excited about the deal, but I don’t feel he is worth that much more than Joni.
Here's the SKINNy, the All-STAAL game was CAMtastic!
watch him, it’s pretty obvious why he’s worth every penny, he’s a beast. Pit’s & Burns got their money for different reasons and it’s not a slight on Pit’s that he’s making $2mil less than Burns.
I’ve watched him and I see a very good player in Burns, but not one worth $5.75 million. He will do fine in San Jose and probably score over 50 points with a talented team around him. But his new contract and Wisniewski’s are inflated and will only lead to more inflated contracts down the road. Like I said earlier, I’m not really a Pits fan; but I do not believe Burns is worth that much more than Pitkanen.
Here's the SKINNy, the All-STAAL game was CAMtastic!
I have to go with Go_Shelf here… Burns has monster potential, I would take him over Pitkanen and at $5.75 million long-term all day. He is going to score a lot of points with the Sharks, I know I am taking him as a mid round sleeper in Fantasy Hockey this year.
Right now $5.75 million is probably top-end for Burn’s play last year… But he is not even in his prime and will probably be worth more than that for the next 5 years.
I do agree that JR got a great deal for Pitkanen. I think Pitkanen could have gotten $5+ million very easily on the open market. We would have had to give up a fortune in prospects/picks to get Burns based on what SJ paid.
I can understand everybody’s opinion of Burns, he is a good defenseman with potential, but the guy is only a year younger than Pits. My main point is that I feel San Jose (as well as Columbus with Wiz) overpaid for Burns; driving up the price on free agent defensemen next season. I just wish/hope that some GM’s could show some restraint in signing players because we the fans are going to have to pay for their blunders. I mean how sad is it that average to below average players with high dollar contracts are traded for so certain teams can get to the cap floor?
Here's the SKINNy, the All-STAAL game was CAMtastic!
by PackPride17 on Aug 1, 2011 7:43 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
There’s other factors at play as well: rising cap, salary floor, etc. In any case, what I really like about Burns is I’ve played with 2 guys of similar stature; 1 was soft, the other was un-coordinated and have played against many others that have similar traits; Burns on the other hand is incredibly coordinated for a guy that size, is mean, and is overall tough to play against. If he stays healthy, will be for many years a brutal advisary, which is a lot of the value and why I don’t have an issue with what he’s being paid.
Wouldn't you say that Burns has been on a worse team all along in Minny?
That would explain the +/- difference pretty easily.
Advance apologies if the contents of this sports-based post offended you. I'm just aiming to educate the masses. My law professor says they're asses.
Panthers '010: Save the Richardson family coffers! We'll take the winning if we stumble into it.
by MichaelProcton on Aug 2, 2011 2:36 PM EDT up reply actions
Over the past 4 seasons; both Minnesota and Carolina have made the playoffs once. The total number of points collected in the 4 seasons combined are 360 for Carolina & 357 for Minnesota.
I wouldn’t consider that a big difference (Carolina a little more offensive & Minnesota a little more defensive) , so no that probably doesn’t explain Burns +/-.
Here's the SKINNy, the All-STAAL game was CAMtastic!
I don’t know how true this is, but I would suspect that if you play on a non-playoff team and log the majority of your minutes as a dman against the other teams top line it’s tough to come out with a positive +/-.
Again, my whole point isn’t that Burns is a bad player; because I would love to have him on my team, just not at the salary that San Jose offered. He has awesome skating abilities, a great shot, and size (which you can’t teach); but he has been inconsistent in his own end. I really just don’t see him worth $5.76M at this point in his career. Also, while he an Joni are not the same type of player; I do not think Burns is $1.26M better than Joni. I think San Jose overpaid for Burns, similar to Columbus overpaying for Wisneiwski. And I believe that will come back to bite NHL franchises and us the fans. I understand you disagree, but that is what I am trying to convey; not that Burns is a bad player, because he is pretty good.
Here's the SKINNy, the All-STAAL game was CAMtastic!
by PackPride17 on Aug 2, 2011 6:32 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
B+/A-
I voted B though. He had a very good season but there is room for improvement. Though maybe I should’ve voted A just on his hit totals. If he works on his faceoffs this offseason, he’ll be great anchoring the 2nd line.
Thought he played well as a center (aside from the brutal face-off percentage) and his line with Jokinen/LaRose and Skinner was pretty solid for most of the year. He showed good playmaking skills and definitely gives us more depth down the middle. Should we keep pairing him with Skinner next season or bump Skinner up to the first line with Staal and see how Ruutu does with Boychuk?
www.shutdownline.com
Skinner-Ruutu-Jokinen
keep the band together, they were the best line down the stretch and really weren’t put together until about 10 games after the ASG, Jokinen seemed to be the missing piece.
A..
Come on a B because he didn’t win enough faceoffs?? He’s not even a full-time ctr!!!
2nd most hits in the NHL!! The guys a stud! The consumate professional! I had a prof or two like this… marking like noone was good enough for an A!! Get over yourself!
I gave him an A last year...
But he pretty much was a full-time center.
Advance apologies if the contents of this sports-based post offended you. I'm just aiming to educate the masses. My law professor says they're asses.
Panthers '011: This is what we've been waiting for...we get to overpay the core of a 2-14 team!
by MichaelProcton on Aug 2, 2011 3:09 PM EDT up reply actions
A
Ruutu did a great job last season. Hope he does the same this year. :)
Ready for the Canes to win the Cup again! :)
A
In a season after major shoulder surgery, he “brought it” every game. If the heart of the team moniker were up for a vote…Ruutu would get mine.
2 years to the Cup
Great write up. Thanks for doing this. I’m really intrigued that the Canes seem to be planning him as the #2 center and, knowing him, he’ll be much more prepared for the faceoff assignment this season. And I’m all for the Skinner, Ruutu, Jussi line – I just love watching them. Worth the price of admission fershurr.
And I hadn’t seen the gladiator interview since mid-December. Just awesome – thanks for getting it up there to remind me. Is it October yet?
Twitter @HMof2
by Carolyn Christians on Aug 1, 2011 7:07 PM EDT reply actions
Skinner/Ruutu/Jokinen
In watching the videos, the Skinner/Ruutu/Jokinen line was even more impressive and noticeably so than I realized watching the games live or on tv. Is there a website that has the statistics for which lines were on the ice when various players scored? Skinner seems to have a desire to play center; but Ruutu did a great job at center and from the center of the ice, he gets better angles for making hits.
If you find such a stats site, please let me know, because when I was researching this article I tried to find one. Behind the Net has TOI linemate statistics but I couldn’t find scoring linemate statistics. Would be a really nice statistic to follow.
I think it’s safe to say Ruuty and Skins were on the ice together for a very high percentage of goals scored by one or the other. I didn’t evaluate Jussi, but I did notice that quite a few of Cole’s points also came when the two of them were on the ice with him at the same time.
Phoblographer
by Jamie Kellner on Aug 1, 2011 9:11 PM EDT up reply actions
It shows who is on the ice when a goal is scored on the game summary and play-by-play (which gives positions), but there is no compilation from every game as far as I am aware. You would have to go through each game individually.
I did go through the Games summaries for an overall view; but didn’t add them up. Jamie, I think, is correct that once Skinner and Ruutu were paired together, they did quite well. My observation was that once they were on a line with Jokinen the entire line prospered. Maybe somebody at Canes Country can track those figures in 2011-2012.
I was thinking maybe Dobberhockey would have something in this area – like when Bob could tell us how all the D pairings worked last week. But I’m not a fantasy hockey type and don’t know my way around there at all.
Twitter @HMof2
by Carolyn Christians on Aug 1, 2011 11:24 PM EDT up reply actions
Well I love his efforts
but gave him a High “B+” but he should get his stats up in the F/O circle …I’d be one of the top 10 to give the man a “A+++”…thanks Miss Jamie…good effrot…thank you…
What did you do during the summer when the playoffs are over ?
Go Canes & Checkers !!

by 
























