Samson Shines: Flyers 2, Hurricanes 1
The Carolina Hurricanes battled pretty evenly with one of the toughest teams in the league, but lost to the Philadelphia Flyers, 2-1 on Tuesday night in front of 14,511 at the RBC.
Recent call up Jerome Samson scored the lone goal for the Hurricanes.
After an evenly played scoreless first period, the Flyers would take the lead 4:20 into the second when Brayden Schenn knocked in the rebound of a Wayne Simmonds shot. It was Schenn's second goal of the season.
But midway through the second, Samson drew a penalty as he skated into the offensive zone. Coach Kirk Miller rewarded the forward with some powerplay time, and Samson did not disappoint as he rifled in a Justin Faulk rebound to tie things up. It was Samson's first career NHL goal.
The youngster created the play when he won a puck battle behind the net and found Faulk open at the blueline. Later in the game, he was rewarded again as he was moved up to Eric Staal's line. He had a couple of other good chances as well and drew praise from his coach after the game.
"I thought he had opportunities tonight," said Muller. "Some were just by hockey sense of finding the right area and some were just him creating opportunities."
Philadelphia would take the lead for good early in the third when Sean Couturier beat Cam Ward with a perfect, uncontested shot in the upper corner. The teams battled evenly the rest of the game as that goal proved to be the game winner.
Overall, the head coach was happier with this performance than he was in Nashville.
"We battled, we played for the most part, head to head with them," Muller said. "We had our opportunities, we didn't capitalize, but I liked our effort a lot more tonight."
The Canes travel tomorrow to Tampa Bay for another game against the Lightning on Thursday night,
Game Notes:
- The Canes had 36 shots on goal led by Samson with five. Faulk was next with four.
- Jaroslav Spacek took a puck to the face area in the second period and left the game. There was no update on his condition after the game.
- The Canes won 52% of the game's faceoffs. (Staal 55%, Sutter 39%, Jokinen 67%, Brent 40%)
- Gleason led the team with 24:31 of TOI. Samson played 13:26, but more importantly, he finally got some powerplay time.
- The team blocked 11 shots, led by Bryan Allen with three.
- Patrick Dwyer, Brandon Sutter, and Anthony Stewart had three hits each. The team was credited with 21 in this game, after having nine in Nashville.
- Cam Ward played a solid game and made 35 saves on 37 shots. Bobrovsky got third star of the game for making 35 saves on 36 shots.
Post game interviews:
74 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Really wasn't as close as the score...
Not sure what it looked like on TV, but in person we were out-muscled, slow, and lacking in quality shots.
We had 36 SOG, but I’d say 85% of those shots were easily caught or turned aside by BOB. Then, when we should have put a puck on goal with good traffic in front of BOB, we hesitated to pull the trigger instead, opting for some fancy pass.
Our fore-checking was just no match due to size differential and strength. Was something wrong with Faulk? Man he looked so slow tonight. Jussi, really needs to shoot more. Physicality was a joke.
Hate to say it, but Ruutu is gone.
by Charles Lawton on Jan 10, 2012 10:54 PM EST reply actions
I saw the seem things. I was rather surprised to read the gameday thread and see everyone saying the game was close and that we were fighting hard.
Well, I didn’t think that at all. We were out-muscled all game. This is probably the softest Hurricanes team I have ever seen. None of our passes were connecting, players were bobbling easy pucks. Everytime we finally got the puck on our stick, we would hold on to it for a second too long and a Philly player would come and snatch it. We got very few good scoring chances. Most of our “shots” were weak little lobs from the blue line/outside the circles. Rebounds were there, but no Hurricane was. We couldn’t even set up any play.
Here is a summary of our offensive push: Defenseman passes it to forward, forward fumbles puck, Philly takes puck and throws it up ice. Defenseman tries again, forward takes it to the half boards and stops. He sees Philly player coming at him and throws the puck away, often to either a Philly player or open ice. Defenseman regains puck. He dumps it in to Philly zone. Forwards go after it, and then see that they are about to get hit. LINE CHANGE!
This “physical” practice that apparently happened didn’t seem to do anything. Minus the better penalty kill, this game was a clone of the Nashville one. Bad bad bad bad bad.
Agree 100% with your assessment… overall, one of the most frustrating nights at the RBC center. So much slop every where. Sure Philly is a good team, but the Canes were their own worst enemy.
Did like what I saw in Samson though. He needs to stay on with the team AND on the top line.
by Charles Lawton on Jan 10, 2012 11:11 PM EST up reply actions
That’s what I thought about Bowman. See how far that got him.
by GordonKeehn on Jan 11, 2012 12:46 PM EST up reply actions
The Game on TV
I watched the game from Alabama, so I am surprised at your observations. I defer to you because hockey is a game best experienced live, I think. On tv it was a very closely played game. I have no doubt, however, that the Flyers are a much more physical, bigger, more aggressive team. The Flyers are built the way the Hurricanes have to go to compete. The Hurricanes forwards are not great open ice hitters and it shows in the way opposing teams rush down the ice. Ruutu had some nice hits, at least as seen on tv.
Samson looked quite good. Nodl had some fine speed and hands. Faulk seemed again to me to be the best Hurricanes defenseman. I don’t know how the team morale can be very high knowing that significant trades are on the way. I really had hoped Staal would take over the game; and he did have a great pass to Samson. It was not frustrating to watch on tv. It must have had a much different feel at the RBC.
Yes, it must have been different on TV. I would not say it was close to being even at all. Scorewise, yes, but the Flyers were outright dominating us in both zones all night. I don’t think Philly put forth much of an effort to be honest. I’ve seen much better play from them.
I commented last night how much Philly’s style of play reminded me of the Lavi years down here. Funny to watch.
"I need to make sure I don't get too frustrated and stay focused on my game...The points and the offense, you have to believe, are going to come." - Eric Staal, 11/6/2011
by Capt. Stinky on Jan 11, 2012 6:44 AM EST up reply actions
I was there and frankly I wasn’t impressed with either team. Don’t think Philly was as dominant as some suggest but also don’t think we saw their A game. Biggest frustration for me was that Canes did not go hard to the net. You can’t score on an NHL goalie if he sees every shot clearly and has time to set up. Our only goal was on the PP when he had to make two save in traffic and Samson was in a good position for the rebound.
Philly’s first goal was aggravating because it came as a result of a lack of hustle back by our forwards. Cam made the first save but the trailer had an easy put in. Where was the backcheck? That guy should have had his stick tied up.
Mo was often criticized because he changed up the lines constantly. Muller did it even more last night. I know he is looking for some ( any) combinations that work but on several rushes we were offside or just dumped because the forwards looked unsure as to the tendencies of their linemates. The game had no flow for either team. If the score had not been so close we would have left early just because it was plain bad hockey all around….. and again, not impressed much by Philly either.
Agree.......
While Philly did not look good last night they are still a formidable team even without Pronger…….I’m still not sold on their off season moves…I mean has Bryzgalov won a playoff series?
In Kirk we Trust
Makes me wonder
If we sent Samson back to Charlotte…. Rosie and Wwyer both healthy… then ran this team in a scrimage up against the current Charlotte roster with all the prospects playing for Charlotte: Who would win?
I’d venture Cam would be the difference for the Canes, but outside of Cam? Bet the Charlotte depth would have a real good chance at this team….
…and that’s sad.
As much as we tend top rag on the Canes, in truth if we played that game and put some incentive on the line to ensure the NHLers are motivated, there is no doubt in my mind that the Big club would not allow it to be close. Just for starters look at Charlotte’s D.
There has been no cohesion, in my opinion, since Muller shuffled the lines up before the Buffalo game. We played well in the Buffalo game but a lot of goals were scored on hustle, which we lacked again tonight.
What the team seems to be missing right now is speed and determination. Samson looked like our best forward on the ice tonight outside of Ruutu. Unfortunately, just like Dalpe and Bowman, he is destined to be sent back down to the AHL so that we can play LaRose.
I want to see the team bring up the AHL players who are better than 95% of our roster. Put Dalpe out with Staal again. Staal looked as good as I have seen him all season when he was with Dalpe, and he seems to have reverted back to his bad state again since his demotion. Bowman game Sutter some support, but Dwyer and Nodl don’t. Dwyer is obviously not 100% and needs to be sat until he is. Nodl just doesn’t do anything worthwhile. Ruutu does not play well with Staal at all. Tlusty doesn’t belong anywhere near the first line. Jokinen is out of it without Skinner and Ruutu. Outside of Stewart’s rare rush, the fourth line does nothing (why is Brett Sutter up again instead of Bowman?).
Muller should take a step back and analyze where his forward lines are. Bring up the players who want to play and be physical and haven’t been infected by whatever disease the team has and play them.
One more thing – I expect we will see Gleason’s trade very soon. Philly was certainly interested and Gleason showed them exactly what they are looking for (minus the beating up Philly players).
I’m totally on board with bringing up Dalpe and Bowman. Staal is now plus/minus minus 24; and it seems as if unless Dalpe is on his line, he sinks down deeper. As far as I am concerned Ruutu and Staal do not generally work well together because they try to get to the same places on the ice. Also, it seems as if Ruutu is not on the same wave length as Staal. I think Tlusty can be a good player on the third line; and has more talent than he is showing. Still, as I said on tv it looked like a hard fought, tight game.
I do disagree about Nodl. He looked fine on video and gathered plenty of pucks and made good decisions with the puck. It will help the team to get the trades completed. Nobody on the team can be feeling very focused not knowing who will be on the team after February 27th.
From my perspective that wasn’t a bad loss. I felt they played sloppy and careless with the puck which came at the expense of playing with some urgency. It looked as though they were told “Skate first, think second.”. The skating was there tonight. I thought that Samsone was one of, if not the best Cane on the ice tonight- best game by a call up all year. Ward was good, but that 2nd was soft. He took his eye off the puck to see where the other attacker was, and bam – he wants that back.
I think the short answer is that Ward and Staal are frustrated to the point of being depressed about the season. It’s understandable. They have won a Stanley Cup; and went into this season thinking they’d be in the battle for a playoff spot. Now they are in a battle to see which players will remain after the firestorm hits. The second goal was one Ward typically stops. It wasn’t a mind freeze goal, but it was one that Cam Ward on the top of his game will stop. I suppose that is the point. Ward is playing fine by almost anybody’s standards other than his own. Staal is playing better; but Staal on his game finds a way to score a goal. So be it. That’s hockey. Sometimes the hockey gods make fools of the players, the coaches, the general managers, the owners, and the fans. “What fools these mortals be.” Still, it’s fun watching the kids play. It’s fun watching Muller sort out who he wants for next season. It’s fun thinking about the 2012 draft and the potential for a top five pick.
There are much worse things in life than watching a young team try to pick itself up after flopping in the mud. There’s a tunnel at the end of the light, or something like that.
That second goal was Faulk’s fault. From where I was sitting (on the glass directly to the right of Ward), Faulk peeled off at the last second from covering the shooter and left him wide open, at speed, to cherry pick his spot in the net. Yes, if Ward was playing out of his mind, he may have been able to stop that one. But the shot should have never happened. Now, Faulk may have been going to cover a guy coming down on the wing and letting Ward deal with the shooter, but the lapse in coverage when the shooter is on the doorstep shouldn’t happen.
Watched the replay several times. Reid was charging up the middle uncovered and Faulk made the decision to play him and give Ward the shooter. If he went hard to Couturier it would have led to an easy pass to Reid. From the angle of the shooter, I’d say many experienced NHL D would have made the same decision. Thought Cam was a bit deep and got beat where the book on him is… high stick or glove side.
I agree with my humble and limited playing experience. If the goal had been scored by Reid via the cross crease pass, #28 would be blamed by many for taking Couturier. D-men get blamed for a lot of goals that simply are not their fault. I think Cam has to make that save even from that range.
"Forget about style; worry about results."
Bobby Orr
Typical for This Season
This season goals like Couturier’s are getting past Ward whereas when Ward is at his best, he stops those shots. So it goes. The team is still in a funk. As you mentioned above, the forwards don’t drive the net well with the puck. The Flyers are a big, physical team with a mean streak. The Hurricanes are not.
Faulk made the textbook decision, let the goalie take the puck carrier. You can see Cam move his head to his right to look for Reid and Couturier noticed, and released it before Cam looked back. By the time he looked back it was on its way.
Watched it on TV...
and I was happy with the game – except for the officiating, which was as usual for the NHL this time of the year (or basically since the lockout) – a complete load of crap and they need new referees. Especially how the Flyers got away with a few penalties, yet we got called on them. We might have lost, but it was a solid 60 minutes of game from what I could tell on the TV. We’ll get the next one. :)
Ready for the Canes to win the Cup again! :)
perspective is a good thing
someone seeing this game as their first 2011-2012 ’Canes game would think, “Geez, those guys are pansies, getting pushed off the puck, not driving the net consistently, doing fancy drop passes, skating away from the crease on rushes, defensively getting dominated…” but to the trained Caniac eye, this was one of our better games.
Sad, isn’t it?
ANYWAYS…great for Samson! I thought he looked awesome out there, really. Imagine if players like him had gotten significant ice time earlier, their progression as an NHL-ready player would’ve been happening earlier, and lines in Raleigh would be more cohesive.
Here’s to next year, then!
Cam looked real good, too. Flyers are pretty darn good team.
I've discovered who that woman was having the heart attack when Staal scored: The Love Boat's Lauren Tewes!
by Capt. Stinky on Jan 11, 2012 6:01 AM EST up reply actions
I always said...
They should have called him up long ago. Mainly b/c how well he played late last season. :)
Ready for the Canes to win the Cup again! :)
by thebl4ckd0g on Jan 11, 2012 12:37 PM EST up reply actions
Agreed on Samson. I thought he was the best Cane on the ice last night.
"If you can't beat 'em in the alley, you can't beat 'em on the ice." Conn Smythe
by Winter is Coming on Jan 11, 2012 1:42 PM EST up reply actions
Quick passing
Did anyone else notice an abundance of very quick sudden passing last night? I felt that multiple guys got the puck then just immediately launched it down the ice, like one-timer passes, even when no one was open or when the passer wasn’t pressured. I’m all for trying to speed up play and not give the opponent time to set up, but it looked like players were rushing rather than being strategic.
I definitely thought there was good (Samson) and bad (lack of physicality in the 2nd and 3rd) but mainly our guys looked slow to me. I miss Dalpe, even though he was only here a few games. I know there are going to be good and bad nights with a team in constant flux like ours, but I really was enjoying that home streak from a couple weeks ago :)
The Flyers did just enough to win. That is how much better they are than the Canes.
Samson had a good game but can he repeat it game after game (assuming he gets the chance).
From where I sit that second goal was on Faulk. For some reason he decided to take the other guy who was coming up on the other wing but he was already covered by Harrison so Faulk ended up in no mans land.
while there is no such thing as a " good loss"
asca loss is still a loss…and this fan at home saw much of what many here have said both the good,the bad and the uber ugly play of and by the Canes. Now will Gleason & Ruutu help their causes on the trade train ? Only JR and Ron Francis will know for sure. Yet aside from the scrappy play by Samson and a major pass gaff/brainfart by Ruutu and a screw up my Faulk the game was “decent” …but still a freaking loss is still a LOSS. And this fan is tired of losing ways and attitudes…as ut remibnds me of a dog that cowels when it’s owner walk by or peas on the rug when it’s owner yells at it…and even with a new owner ( coach Muller) the team is still skiddish and nervous and unsure at times..sadsly more often than not..a pet and team like that can be saved…but at what expence to we,the fans who buy faithfully the bill of "goods’ the front office passes off on us..and my fear is even if Canes lose a Gleason/Ruutu…what does the team and fans get in return and will at least get the Team back up to .500% hockey ? Will it take keeping Bowman,Dalpe & Samson up fr the rest of the season ? From this fan’s perspective..if that is wehat it will take..then so be it…but remember i am just a fan…and what do i know ?
9/11/01 - Never Forget !!
Long Live #63 The Condor
Go Canes & Checkers !!!
Evenly matched game
I thought the Canes played pretty well, there were times when the Flyers dominated, but other times when we did.
We had several high quality scoring chances.
At least twice in the third period I believe Staal could have scored if he planted himself in front of the net. He seems to always go to the side of the net or look for a pass behind the net.
On the second goal, Faulk made a mistake, given his youth and the amount of ice time he gets, some mistakes will happen.
He was in a no win situation there…he had to take one of the two. Cam had to do his part.
"Forget about style; worry about results."
Bobby Orr
As noted elsewhere in this post… Faulk made the textbook decision. He took Reid who was a definite threat coming up the middle and gave Cam the shooter. Cam was a bit deep in the net and he got beat where he is vulnerable…. high stick side. Book on Cam is to shoot high glove or stick and that works too often for the true snipers.
I thought Harrison had the other player covered?
by CanesFanFromLI on Jan 11, 2012 2:46 PM EST up reply actions
No…. he had the original puck carrier into the zone who dropped it to Couturier and then went hard to the far post. Reid was the trailer coming up the middle and whoever was back checking was a full step and half behind him. So Harry has the guy driving to net; Faulk made the decision to challenge Reid and give the shooter to Ward. Philly played it textbook. Faulk played it textbook. Then a one on one contest between Ward and Couturier. In my opinion Ward worried a bit too much about Reid and did not come out to challenge Couturier and gave him too much net to shoot at. I don’t fault Ward so much as it was a well executed play by Philly. But I definitely don’t agree with criticism of Faulk. if you want to lay blame I’d go to however was a step and half behind Reid. If someone had Reid, Faulk could challenge Couturier. It was lazy backchecking that also caused the first goal.
all three forwards
got pinned deep, and the head man pass was a beaut.
The Condor. #63.
by DidJussiThat? on Jan 11, 2012 5:01 PM EST up reply actions
Last nights game..
just goes to illustrate the point that the current roster does not have enough talent to be competitive every night, especially against elite teams. That being said, I have no problem with the effort from last night. The Canes were right there with one of the top teams in the league, add playing with only 5 D for most of the game and it’s hard to complain about the loss.
From section 106, i did not sense a lot of frustration from the other fans, and the bench was very interactive all night.
Philly makes a lot of teams look bad, we have had worse games/outcomes against Philly with a much better roster.
Obviously we need Skinner back, but last night just goes to show how many holes the current roster has.
We need a #2 Center and a wing for Staal. Jussi hates playing C, and has been most successful playing LW during his time with the Canes. Being objective, the Canes currently have 4 players deserving/capable of playing in the top 6. Staal, Skinner, Ruutu, Jussi. Sutter may eventually develop into a top 6 role, but at this point in his career is better suited to play the shutdown role and 3rd line C. A third line of Sutter-LaRose-Tlusty creates matchup problems for opposing teams.
The D situation is much more complicated. Out of 6 D spots, I would guess only 3 of our current roster will be back next season, Faulk, Harrison, Pitts. As elusive as a winger for Staal has been, someone to pair with Pittkanen has been just as elusive. I realize I’m leaving out McBain, but he is redundant in the current organizational depth chart. With a lot of observers expecting Murphy to make the jump to the NHL next year, McBain would seem the odd man out. Even if Gleason is resigned, the Canes need to add grit and toughness on the back end.
Just one fans perspective, take it for what you will.
Once, during Prohibition, I was forced to live for days on nothing but food and water ~ W.C. Fields
by SouthernHockeyFan on Jan 11, 2012 8:39 AM EST reply actions
Third Lines
Third lines of
Tlusty/Sutter/Bowman
Bowman/Sutter/Samson
Nodl/Sutter/Bowman
Nodl/Sutter/Samson
are difficult matchups for opposing teams. The Hurricanes have fine choices in creating a third line.
I’d betcha Bowman Sutter Samson would be awesome compared to what we’ve played in that role the rest of this year: Both offensively and Defensively. Fast, Hands, guys with Hockey Sense in capital letters.
I really hadn’t thought of that group, but I have to admit; that would be a very interesting 3rd line! I really believe Bowman has earned a spot, Sutter is concrete, and if Samson can play like he did last night; then he would be a very good 3rd liner.
We just have so many players capable of playing 3rd or 4th line and so little that are truely capable of playing in the top 6. Its just sad. We need to find a team that needs some depth and trade a couple of our 3rd liners for 1 true top 6 player.
Staal & Dalpe; The New Dynamic Duo or The Canes Crusaders!
by PackPride17 on Jan 11, 2012 11:18 AM EST up reply actions
Just Saying...
I think it’s a real measure of how bad things have gotten for our Canes when the best player on the ice last night scored the only goal and is on an emergency call up from Charlotte.
it is also a sign there is talent in the organization
It will suck for Charlotte when these guys come up here full time after the trade deadline, but that is the life of a minor league hockey town. You have to know any decent player probably will not be there for long and have to really hope that is the case for that player and the parent club.
here was the final nail in the coffin
Even though this team is a lot better on faceoffs. We had 3 big offensive end faceoffs in the last 1:30 and Staal went 0-3! We never really set up any pressure other then that throw on goal from a tough angle because we did not possess the puck in their end at all that last 1:30.
I think the effort was there, this team is just not a physical team.
For those wanting the young guys(and I am one of them) I think we will see them it will be after the trade deadline. Unless we make a big blockbuster trade, the UFA will go for picks and prospects so that means the guys will get the call up.
It seems to me coach is calling them up 1 at a time and taking a look at them so when that happens he can decide who it is he wants to see full time.
I also would be shocked if Boychuk is still part of this organization after the deadline as well.
Don't Forget
Teams near the salary floor cannot just fire sale and not take on salary in return. I agree it is time to start seeing what the future holds for some of the young UFA’s in Charlotte, however this does create some challenges for the GM in making trades.
In Kirk we Trust
I agree on the criticism of Staal but in the spirit of fairness he also made an awesome pass to put Samson in alone on Bobs late in the game when Philly was in prevent mode and I’m sure Samson would like to have it over again and try a different move.
It was an AHL move—not what a seasoned NHL scorer would have done. It’s why I always want these guys to get more time to figure therse kinds of things out. To find their game when they are up against bigger, faster Dmen and Goalies. It isn;t the same as the AHL.
Squeaky83, I am not with you on that comment. It was a fine move; but Samson needed to lift the puck more. I can’t count all the times similar shots were made by Hurricanes forwards. It was a beautiful pass by Staal. It was not the perfect finish. Samson had a great game; and I don’t attribute that shot to his being an AHL player.
I tend to agree. My comment was not intended to be critical of Samson. He made his move but probably has no book on Bobs, who is good down low. Give him full marks for going hard to the net, getting open and even creating the opportunity. I have nothing but praise for Samson’s game last night. Now comes the hard part. Do it consistently.
Samson and Hunger to Succeed
I predict if Samson is left up with Carolina he will always be a guy who is relentless. It’s in his DNA. He doesn’t pout. He doesn’t whine. He reminds me of Bowman in that his entire being wants to be an NHL player. Both for Samson and Bowman their style of play demands that they never let up and never ease out of a shift. I think Muller could be onto something if he gets two scoring lines with highest end talent and two hardnosed, but offensively solid lines. Having players who are desperate to play in the NHL is a great start. I don’t see that desperation shift after shift with Ponikarovksy; and I suspect he will soon be out the door.
We were commenting last night that Poni looked invisible. He is slow. His strengths are to use his big body to cycle down low, go to the front of the net or battle. He was doing none of the above. I hear that this is what happened in LA. Some early success but then a combination of injuries and poor play and he fizzled.
Well, I wasn’t trying to criticize. And I guess it was a bit of a flippant comment. I meant it similar to you comment Sittler—the move might have worked AHL, but NHL goalies move and cover down low a lot better. The good scorers can elevate quickly and in close in the NHL. I thought his move trying to go by using speed and shoot low wasn’t what an NHL experienced scorer would try.
It’s part of what all our prospects need to learn—and can only do playing in the NHL. One of Skinner’s advantages is a quick learning curve with his good skills. Many times last season as teams adapted to him, he changed/raised his game. Dalpe, Samson, Boychuk will take more time, but I think given it they to can raise their game to NHL level.
not quite true
yes he was 0-3 on those last three faceoffs (the last two were in the last 10 seconds) but we generated sustained pressure for the entirety of the second half of the third period, especially the Staal, Ruutu, Samson line.
I saw one absolutely beautiful pass from Staal that Samson was inches from burying. And another from Samson when he missed that shot, skated behind the goal and fired it back right into the crease.
I was pleased with the effort. Bobo played great and stopped some solid scoring chances.
Remember, this team is playing without a good deal of its scoring ability with Pikanen, Skinner and LaRose on the shelf at the same time.
The Condor. #63.
by DidJussiThat? on Jan 11, 2012 4:55 PM EST up reply actions
I thought last night’s game was a pretty good matchup. There were times were Philly’s top line really controlled the puck well in our zone, but they didn’t get a lot of shots on goal. I thought Allen really had a difficult night. On the other hand, the Staal line & the Jussi line had some good puck control also. Samson was really the best forward on the ice for the Canes and Ward looked solid except for that 2nd goal. This team is still in need of a talent upgrade. I think one of the Charlotte guys could work well with Staal on the top line, but we need another proven point producer to round out that line. When Skinner does come back, I still believe that he and Staal should not be on the same line; I don’t believe their compliment each other great.
This team has made strides and appears to be able to play with anybody at home, but we are still a long way away from being a true playoff-caliber team. I hope PK & JR see this and make the appropriate changes instead of hoping some project has a career year.
Staal & Dalpe; The New Dynamic Duo or The Canes Crusaders!
I was at the game last nite and thpought it was closely contested. One that continues to be the same and absolutely annoyed me all nite though. We are pulling up short of the goal in the offensive zone and not parking someone at the net or driving the net near enough. Granted, Phillys d packs it in very tight around the goal (something we do not do consistently and frankly the good team do). Bobrovsky made a few good saves but he was not spetacular. We had many scoring chances and frankly he came out a bit lucky as so many passes were made through/to the crease an no one was there to recieve the pass, or if they were close by, were way late getting to their spot…very very very annoying…
From the boob tube Bobrovsky seemed to be playing out of his mind at times. This thread has really demoonstrated how fans in the arena and fans at home can all see the same event in different formats and come up with different views of how the game was played. Tripp said what a great hockey game it was immediately after the horn sounded.
I came away feeling like it was a good game to watch from home. At times, I felt like Philly just had a gear we do not possess. I sure liked Samson with Staal…maybe it was adreneline, but he seemed to be able to hang well against the physicality that a FLyers team is sure to bring. I hope he sees more time on the top line and on the PP.
By the way, remember the show “Oil Change” on the NHL network? I am hoping we get a show called “Weather Change” or “Winds of Change” ….that would be cool to see.
"Forget about style; worry about results."
Bobby Orr
I really felt like this was a clear example of one team getting beaten by a much better team. I didn’t think that the Canes had a bad game, I thought they played well compared to how they’ve played for most of the season. Philly was simply the better team. As others have mentioned, there was a clear talent gap. I don’t mean that we won’t win some of those games, but to do that the Canes need to out-hustle at every opportunity.
"If you can't beat 'em in the alley, you can't beat 'em on the ice." Conn Smythe
by Winter is Coming on Jan 11, 2012 1:40 PM EST reply actions
Our shooting was not a good as the flyers, that’s for sure—but that’s consistent with only having two true NHL top six guys playing: Ruu and Staal. We also had little net presence or guys trying to get in for the many rebounds Bob left on the table.
One of the good things I thought we did was not to quit when the FLyers tilted the ice, or when they took the lead. Despite this no being the Flyers best game, we managed to swing momentum back and forth, so we at least matched the intensity the Flyers threw at us. Might not have been their best, but we at least stayed competitive and had a chance. Baby steps.
It’ll take JR making moves for us to really be competitive. This team is not physical enough, and doesn’t have enough finishers. Whether those moves involve giving Dalpe, Bowman or Samson more time, trades, FA acquisitions doesn’t matter. This team’s status quo sucks.
Possession
I watched the game on TV and thought it was fairly close, yet I felt Philly had possession in our zone a lot more than we had possession in theirs. But in the end, their goalie appeared to play a little better than ours.
Soccer match reports typically include time of possession for each team. I’d like to see statistics something like that for hockey, both time of possession and time of possession in the other team’s zone, and finally time the puck is in one team’s zone or the other regardless of who has it. Unfortunately keeping such stats would be time-consuming (then again, how does anyone manage to keep the time on ice stats?). Does anyone know of a source for such stats?
Are you volunteering to keep that stat? The puck changes possession so often and so quickly compared to futbol, I can’t imagine trying to keep in accurately. But, yes, I’d be curious to see it too.
SAMSON
Samson played well last night in my opinion. Wonder what folks were saying afterwards when some people were saying the team would miss LaRose on the ice last night. I didn’t. Whether have Samson here and trade LaRose.
by skinnerthewinner on Jan 11, 2012 4:12 PM EST reply actions
Young Forward Prospects and LaRose
There is no purpose in keeping LaRose. The Hurricanes have Dalpe, Bowman, Samson, Rask, Hofmann, Boychuk, the 1st round pick in 2012 (if not two or perhaps three 1st round picks), and Nash. It’s time to rebuild the Hurricane team. From 2005 to the present, the Hurricanes have two playoff appearances. It’s time to turn the page.
A Young Erik Cole
In the Hurricanes system, the closest player at present the Hurricanes have to Erik Cole’s style is Hofmann. He is smaller than Cole, but he plays that kind of physical game. He’s about ten to fifteen pounds of muscle mass from being able to translate his game to the NHL. He has the attitude, the speed, hands, and shot to play in the NHL. He’ll be fun to watch in training camp next season.

























