Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Indy 500: Coverage of the 'Greatest Spectacle In Racing'

Harrison and Faulk Come Through: Hurricanes 4, Bruins 2

RALEIGH, NC - JANUARY 14:  Jay Harrison #44, Tim Brent #37 and Justin Faulk #28 of the Carolina Hurricanes celebrate Harrison's game-winning goal against the Boston Bruins during the third period at the RBC Center on January 14, 2012 in Raleigh, North Carolina. The Hurricanes won 4-2.  (Photo by Grant Halverson/Getty Images)

Justin Faulk scored the game tying goal and Jay Harrison notched the game winner as the Carolina Hurricanes defeated the Boston Bruins, 4-2 in front of a sold out crowd of 18,680 at the RBC on Saturday night.

The Hurricanes scored three goals in the final 6:02 in the deciding third period, including an empty netter by Eric Staal.

After a scoreless first period, the Bruins jumped out to a 1-0 lead in the second when Patrice Bergeron knocked in a Johnny Boychuk rebound. The Canes tied things up shortly after that though when Brandon Sutter stole the puck just inside the blueline and sent a shot toward the net. The puck hit Patrick Dwyer on the way, giving Dwyer his fifth goal of the season.

The Bruins would jump back into the lead just one minute and change into the third when Milan Lucic placed a perfect shot up and over Cam Ward. But the Canes did not give up and had multiple chances down in the Bruins end throughout the period.

Carolina finally dented the scoresheet when Tim Brent got the puck out to Faulk who then put a nice shot in from the point. Harrison also put in a shot from the point with just 1:30 left for the game winner.

The Bruins outmuscled the Hurricanes at times in this game and outshot them in every period, but Carolina generated plenty of chances and played positionally sound most of the night. They kept close and were able to take advantage of some opportunities late.

Next up is Washington tomorrow afternoon at 5.

Star-divide

Game Notes:

  • The Bruins outshot the Canes 35 - 21. Pat Dwyer had a team high four shots.
  • Cam Ward was solid again and might play tomorrow as well, although Muller would not commit when asked post game. Ward made 33 saves on those 35 shots, again improving his season's save percentage.
  • The Canes were credited with 18 hits, led by Anthony Stewart and Tuomo Ruutu with three each.
  • Harrison had a team high 23:27 of ice time followed closely by Faulk with 22:48. Harrison now has points in three straight games.
  • Staal's empty netter gives him points in five straight.
  • The team won 44% of their faceoffs: (Staal 53%, Sutter 33%, Jokinen 57%, Brent 33%)
  • Jerome Samson hurt his shoulder late in the game and was bandaged up in the dressing room. He was not sure if he could play against Washington or not. Jeff Skinner may play.

Interviews:









Comment 28 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

I thought the Canes played solidly tonight. I thought our offense struggled, but I thought or defense played well. Boston is a very good team, but we continued to fight all night and had some things break our way.

I was not impressed by the Gleason/Allen pairing. I know they were going against the Bruins top line, but I know both guys can play better. McBain, through my eyes, continues to struggle in his own zone when any pressure is applied. Samson continues to look like a solid player that will work well in Muller’s system. Harrison & Faulk continue to be our best defensemen. I really don’t know where we would be without Harrison this season.

And my boy Staal continues his point streak and actually gets a goal; even if it was an empty-netter. The sad thing is he dropped back to last place in the league in +/- because Nash got a goal & a +1. :-(

Way to go Canes, that’s 2 in a row. Let’s make it 3 tomorrow in Washington. And that was the first Bruins game I ever seen that they didn’t commit a penalty!

JR; please dump some players and bring the kids up to stay!

by PackPride17 on Jan 14, 2012 11:39 PM EST via mobile reply actions  

Sorry, my bad. Lucic & Allen did get matching penalties near the very end, so Boston did “get called” for a penalty. I guess I was busy rubbing the 4 – 2 score in the Bruins fans beside me and was distracted.

JR; please dump some players and bring the kids up to stay!

by PackPride17 on Jan 15, 2012 9:09 AM EST via mobile up reply actions  

I’ll give the offense credit—given they were up against one of the best back ends and one of the best team defenses in the NHL, given our size compared to what Boston marshalls, given we only had two bona fide top six forwards playing on our team, I thought our offense did very well. Very well indeed.

Our forwards played a much bigger role on the back end helping the defense and being very aggressive and disciplined on the back check—that will tend to dent your offensive output a bit.

Especially when you consider Boston is the best third period team in Hockey right now? Nice effort by the offense all around..

by Squeaky83 on Jan 15, 2012 10:33 AM EST up reply actions  

There is a difference between “committing” a penalty and “being called” for a penalty. On the game winner there could have been interference called on Peverly when he dumped Tlusty. But hey, they stuffed them in the end and that’s fine with me.

By the way did you check out the babyish tactics of Lucic and Chara at the end. A two-hander from Lucic for no reason and Chara acting like a bully. Once again everyone: Same. Old. Bruins.

by VinceCT on Jan 14, 2012 11:51 PM EST reply actions  

I don’t know, I was actually surprised the Bruins played a disciplined game until it was apparent they were going to lose. The only no-call I had an issue was with Chara at the end. How does he not get a roughing penalty with the stuff he was trying to pull on Dwyer?

"I'm not going to waste my time with Tuukka Rask" - Cam Ward

by anonymousJ on Jan 15, 2012 12:08 AM EST via mobile up reply actions  

I believe based on the last game against us,how we tore them up on the PP and took advantage of their lack of discipline, they were trying to keep their cool aqnd just beat us with hockey. Their Coach made statements after the previous game that lend me to believe he reminded them of the same idea—They are bigger faster and mroe skilled than us, so just go play our game and we can beat this team.

Odd that it didn’t work. (Kirk Muller)

by Squeaky83 on Jan 15, 2012 10:35 AM EST up reply actions  

Glad we won, but man, our passing was atrocious.

by hurricane9 on Jan 15, 2012 12:33 AM EST reply actions  

This fan is uber happy the canes won !!

yes passing sucked at times,but when it counted it was there as ther score at the end proves that…and again..Faulk Proves why he was a great choice ti keep at traning camp,Samson also despite being roughed up as he was..also and yet again made the case for himself…it seems over all sevral of the younger guns on the Canes Bench showed the coaching staff they are NHL caliber type of players..and yes Thuggerie showed it’s ugly head..as Chara looked tired near the end of the game…loved the over all effort by the Canes..still have a few kinks yet to work out,but and again very pleased with the WIN!!

9/11/01 - Never Forget !!
Long Live #63 The Condor
Go Canes & Checkers !!!

by CaniacSteve on Jan 15, 2012 6:47 AM EST reply actions  

Most of the kinks to work out now actually involve the talent and skill of our players. One of the things that really impressed me was the lack of mistakes last night—only one bad McBain play. I don’t consider missed passes a mistake—that’s poor skill. We got outplayed and outmuscled at times, but each period we weather the storm and chancged the momentum. We stayed disciplined, we stayed hard playing, and one thing was apparent all night:

You could see by the way they played, our guys thought they could beat the Bruins all night. THAT is a change from a month ago too, where the team would wilt, or look defeated after goals or bad play. They would succumb to pressure. Not these last few games. That change in psyche bodes well.

We won a third of each period—the last third. And we took advatage and won with it. It was Gooooood

by Squeaky83 on Jan 15, 2012 10:41 AM EST up reply actions  

Great game last night for sure. Complete 60 min effort. The Boo-in’s carried the play all night, but the Canes hung in there and bent but didn’t break. Some good traffic in front of the only likeable Boo-in Thomas was the difference maker last night. Staal and Jussi held their on in the circle, and Cam played an outstanding game. I don’t think I even need to go beyond mentioning Justin Faulk. I thought Joslin did pretty well for his first NHL game in a while.
Of all the AHL call-ups this season, Samson has by far the most complete game. Very smart around the ice and just knows where he needs to be. He may have to go back down once Skinner is ready, and now of course he may be nicked up as well, but his time in the AHL really should be nearing an end. He has been impressive against two powerhouse teams, no better evaluation needed. Certainly Samson, Bowman, and Dalpe could all be considered NHL ready, but after seeing all of them ( including Nash and Boychuk) Samson just has a slight edge in my opinion. At this point Boychuk should really not be a part of any future plans.
As CaniacSteve posted above, there are still some aspects that need improvement, but this was a tight contest and everyone did enough to get a win.

by Hockeydog on Jan 15, 2012 7:48 AM EST reply actions  

Just cause it's silly

If you didn’t watch the game on FSCarolinas, there was a funny moment on the bench after Faulk scored to tie the game.

Booming shot and very agile eyebrows it seems. Here’s a 10 sec video clip on youtube – link.

Twitter @HMof2

by Carolyn Christians on Jan 15, 2012 9:43 AM EST reply actions  

He seems to say, I have no idea how that went in, but I’ll take it.

by Hockeydog on Jan 15, 2012 10:15 AM EST up reply actions  

I thought he was making that gesture towards tlusty, who he nearly decapitated, saying “that was close”

by ECUCanesFan on Jan 15, 2012 11:19 AM EST up reply actions  

No power plays for the Canes! Those referees were probably the worst we have seen at the RBC Center this season.

by rmmeli on Jan 15, 2012 10:05 AM EST reply actions  

Shout outs:

Staal: Looks more confident. Winning face-offs against a good team, going to the net, winning his individual puck battles. He no longer looks defeated.

Samson—also looked solid—tenacious, constantly battling and winning the majority of them. Disciplined, smart, good passes towards the net. No defensive mistakes. He’s bona fide. He’s a keeper.

Faulk. 19. Strong for a kid. Had good checks stopping Boston forwards, taking the space, momentum and puck away, keeping calm skating with the puck or making smart passes-not trying to force passes that aren’t there. His play together with Harrison when they get the puck is the best of anyone else in our own end—back between each other, to the forwars, or bringing it up. He’s helped improve Harrisson’s game in this area.

Harrison. Two years agao was a 7th defenseman I did want re—signed. Last year, he came in and showed he was solid, a good defensive defenseman, maybe bottom pairing who could fill on the second pairing, but responsible. This year he comes in stronger again, had a little more physical play, blocks more shots, passes better, and is now adding offense—He’s now Pitkanen Light: as Pitkanen should be defensively (only better), but without Pitkanen’s more fluid skating and puck handling/passing. But again, what an improvement, what a quiet year he is having in the league, but he’s been big for us.

Gleason—despite others thought he had a pretty good game. What surprised me was he had a few Faulk like moves against the boards that stopped the forwards and turned over the puck. Twice gleason actually skated it out of the corner himself before passing it. Haven’t seen that aspect before, but it looked very Faulk like. Either the defensive coaches are working with Gleason on these things, or he’s seeing some of the good things Faulk does and is working on them.

Cam. Welcome back. We missed you.

Forwards in general: Best Defensive Backchecking Game. Actively engaged blocking shots, tying up sticks, anticipating and blocking/intercepting passes, getting to the pucks, taking away space and time, and helping the defense get the puck out of the zone—no cheating last night—no all forward out of the zone and wait for the long pass. Well played Sirs, Well Played.

by Squeaky83 on Jan 15, 2012 10:55 AM EST reply actions  

I Agree!

I love what you’ve written here, especially with regard to Harrison. I don’t know if this is a bad thing for his future with the Canes – given his strong play and relatively low cost, he could be a hot commodity at the trade deadline.

Also, did anyone else notice that Tim Brent ended up +2 on the night with a bit over 8 minutes of playing time?

by hearthesound on Jan 15, 2012 11:05 AM EST reply actions  

Harrison is signed for one more year at $700,000K. It is doubtful that JR could replace him and his contributions at that level. His contribution level and his current contract are exactly the things JR seems to look for. I suppose JR does not really need another task to perform, he already has quiet a few to do. Harrison’s chemistry with Faulk is something I also think JR does not want to mess up.

When able to attack, we must seem unable; when using our forces, we must seem inactive; when we are near, we must make the enemy believe we are far away; when far away, we must make him believe we are near.
Sun Tzu circa 4th Century BC

by hurricanefever on Jan 15, 2012 11:14 AM EST up reply actions  

Harrison

Although I agree that Harrison has been playing magnificently and is projected as part of the Hurricanes’ future, if a GM who had limited cap space offered a first round pick for Harrison, I think that is an offer that Rutherford could not refuse. My only point is there is a difference between how a GM responds to offers for Staal, Ward, Skinner, and Sutter (which is thanks but no thanks); and players like Harrison where it has to be one offer nobody could refuse.

by abramsdoug on Jan 15, 2012 11:17 AM EST up reply actions  

So…..what is your point? You already know that Harrison will not be traded because the idea of any GM offering a first round pick to JR for him is less than 0%. Do you not agree?

And do you not agree it would be a big headache for JR to replace Harrison, a headache he is about 100% sure not to put on his task platter? He already will likely will have to replace 2 d-men (Gleason and Allen) and perhaps 3 if Spacek draws interest.

There is nothing that I can see any GM offering for a 5/6 D-man that would justify losing Harrison.

When able to attack, we must seem unable; when using our forces, we must seem inactive; when we are near, we must make the enemy believe we are far away; when far away, we must make him believe we are near.
Sun Tzu circa 4th Century BC

by hurricanefever on Jan 15, 2012 11:38 AM EST up reply actions  

Harrison presents to some GMs the chance to upgrade of defense for a Stanley Cup run at an affordable price. The contract is ridiculously low. It is also a two year contract. So here are the pros and cons:

CONS TO TRADING HARRISON:

Harrison is hard to replace at anywhere near the cost;
Harrison is just hitting his stride and has had significant improvements over the past two seasons;
Harrison is a big, strong, defenseman who has offense, leadership qualities, and will fight.
Harrison is a glue kind of player who is mentoring Faulk;
Harrison is proof positive that the Hurricanes will work with players to improve them.

PROS TO TRADING HARRISON:

If other GMs get nervous and will pay a premium for Harrison, such as a second round pick and a prospect, the Hurricanes could potentially get another high end player such as Faulk, Dalpe, Rask, and McBain all of whom are second round picks.

Whereas the chances of Ward, Staal, Skinner, and Brandon Sutter as less than zero, I could envision a no-brainer scenario that results in Harrison being traded. I would guess the chances are 75% that Harrison is not traded. On the other hand, if the scouts at the games see a chance to upgrade and have assets they can move, it wouldn’t shock me to see Harrison traded. I agree that Jim Rutherford is not trying to trade Harrison. That deal would have to come to Rutherford.

by abramsdoug on Jan 15, 2012 2:11 PM EST up reply actions  

Well since a 2nd round pick will cost us about $750K at the NHL level and a prospect will cost us about the same or more. Your basically suggesting we trade a player who is playing really well for his cost for 2 unproven commodities that will cost double? Of course one off these prospects could turn out great, but they could both flop or take additional time, which we really don’t have, for them to develop. I know you love young, unproven players; but we don’t need every player on the roster to be a prospect.

JR; please dump some players and bring the kids up to stay!

by PackPride17 on Jan 15, 2012 2:59 PM EST via mobile up reply actions  

If that is the benchmark you see for a Harrison trade then increase those chances again to about 100%. That is likely too steep for a bottom pair D-man I would think.

Why don’t you flip that to see what a 3/4 D pair or top D pair should yield in a trade if you use a 2nd and prospect for a 5/6 D as the starting point. You might come out with Gleason and/or Allen going for a 1st rounder AND a current top 6 winger or something like it. They have value but anything we get beyond a 1st round pick for Gleason is gravy or anything beyond a high level prospect and some other kind of pick is also gravy for Gleason.

When able to attack, we must seem unable; when using our forces, we must seem inactive; when we are near, we must make the enemy believe we are far away; when far away, we must make him believe we are near.
Sun Tzu circa 4th Century BC

by hurricanefever on Jan 15, 2012 3:22 PM EST up reply actions  

From what I am hearing, including sittler27, JIm Rutherford is asking for Gleason what was asked for Whitney, a first round pick and a prospect. Can he get that offer? I have no idea. Would a GM constrained by the salary cap trade a second round pick and a prospect for Harrison? I think, yes, that could well happen in my view. Could Rutherford turn down that high a return for Harrison, I think not. We will know by February 27th who stays and who goes, if not sooner.

by abramsdoug on Jan 15, 2012 8:54 PM EST up reply actions  

I am reminded of a fable told to me in the Navy……a ship’s captain refused to allow lifeboats to be deployed as his ship was sinking……his reasoning “We might need them later”

If JR allows his ship to sink without off-loading his UFA’s and other assets, if necessary, his continued tenure as GM should be highly questioned.

He may ASK for a 1st round and prospect for Gleason……but he is not going to get it………if he does, I will vote him GM Of The Year for the Kaberle off-load and this fantasy trade.

This ignores the fact that JR DOES NOT NEED to trade Harrison………his D-man trade list is already much longer that any GM would want to have.

The difference between your fantasy trade for Harrison and fantasy trade for Gleason is too close: A 1st and Prospect for a 1/2 D verses a 2nd and prospect for a 5/6 D.

When able to attack, we must seem unable; when using our forces, we must seem inactive; when we are near, we must make the enemy believe we are far away; when far away, we must make him believe we are near.
Sun Tzu circa 4th Century BC

by hurricanefever on Jan 16, 2012 9:06 AM EST up reply actions  

As I said above, it is knowable. Trying to figure out the head fakes by Jim Rutherford is difficult which is one reason he is an outstanding GM as far as I am concerned. Why off-load Ruutu if Jim Rutherford can sign him to an extension? Sorry, that makes zero sense to me. Similarly, if Harrison yields a return comparable to Gleason why resist trading him? Again, that makes no sense to me.

by abramsdoug on Jan 16, 2012 11:57 AM EST up reply actions  

I don’t think JR has any interest in trading Harrison unless it is a total no brainer deal. He has another year left on his contract. Gleason, Allen, and Spacek are UFA’s, and McBain is a RFA.

by Hockeydog on Jan 15, 2012 11:16 AM EST up reply actions  

My Shout Outs

Ruutu: Muller is using Ruutu the way he works best for the Hurricanes. Against physical teams like the Bruins, having Ruutu looking to make demolishing hits, makes the opposing teams look around to find him.

Staal: other than one shift where he was knocked to the ice and took his sweet time getting back up on his skates while Tlusty and Ruutu were gaining the puck, he had a strong game. He’s slowly adding a more physical aspect to his game.

Harrison and Faulk: I was so wrong about Harrison. He’s a big part of Hurricanes team. Faulk is a prodigy like Skinner. He’s also strong as an ox and knocked around Boston’s biggest forwards.

Tlusty: He is using his strength and speed to create havoc. He was a forechecking machine last night. Two goals came as a result of monster screens he set.

Nodl and Dwyer: They both were frustrating the Boston forwards with their speed and agility. Both also have great hockey sense and exercised excellent judgment when to go for the puck and when to prepare for the backcheck.

Samson: He plays a complete game. He, too, is extremely strong and has a relentless in getting to and hanging onto the puck. He also has no fear of shooting the puck.

Brandon Sutter: Another quietly excellent game by Brandon Sutter.

Cam Ward: I thought he started off giving some rebounds; but settled down into the amazing Cam Ward that carries the Hurricanes on his back.

Muller and MacLean: They have done an excellent job transforming the Hurricanes into a tough team to play against and one in which all the forwards backcheck consistently. I find myself wondering how different this season would be if Rutherford had signed Muller to start the season, if Rutherford had found a Cole replacement, and if Rutherford had foregone signing Kaberle.

by abramsdoug on Jan 15, 2012 11:15 AM EST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Canes Country, a hockey blog, information hub, and community center for fans of the Carolina Hurricanes.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Small
Spacek
Small
Zach Attack
Small
Jeremy Welsh has already made NHL history
Imported_photos_00002_small
David Booth over Erik "Binky" Cole
Small
If you can't see the puck, you aren't going to make the shot.
Wallpaper-carolina_hurricanes54_small
Jordan Staal a Cane?
C360_2010-08-21_06-51-18_small
THE HURRICANES 2012-2013 DRAFT; KEEPNG THE FORWARD MOMENTUM
Pictures_613_small
My Playoff Musings
Small
How would you spend $20 million?
169031_1308985529987_1391040303_31273096_8072617_n_small
Let's Go Checkers!

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recent FanShots

Hurricanes on the Clock at Hockey Wilderness
TSN Hockey Play of the Year.  Opportunity to vote for Skinner and to see some amazing NHL plays.
Frederik Andersen will likely stay in Sweden one more year
Alex Semin Free Agent
Places to watch hockey in Charlotte
Highlights of the Carolina Hurricanes 4-1 loss to the Florida Panthers on Saturday, April...
Highlights of the Carolina Hurricanes 2-1 shootout win over the Montreal Canadiens on Thursday,...
Highlights of the Carolina Hurricanes 2-1 win over the Ottawa Senators on Tuesday, April...
Tom Rowe hired to coach Lokomotiv Yaroslavl
Sights and Sounds From the Carolina Hurricanes 2011-12 Season

+ New FanShot All FanShots >

Hockey and Local Twitter

More great SB Nation Blogs

Tags


Managing Editor

Cc_shieldjpg_small Bob Wage

Editors

Cc_cory_small Cory Lavalette

95e2a02d-007c-4379-a43d-8331eb2e0d40_small Brian LeBlanc

Contributors

Tuomo_twitter_profile_small Jamie Kellner

Small C-Leaguer

Jeff-eric_small PackPride17

Shutdownline_small MyFriendCorey

Small TimDonelli