Canes reassign Dalpe to Charlotte
On Friday night, after the Hurricanes' 3-0 shutout of Washington, I talked to Zac Dalpe (click to listen) about his back-and-forth season between Charlotte and Raleigh, and the conversation ended with the following exchange (off the mic):
Me: "I'm heading to Charlotte next Friday. Hopefully I won't see you there."
Dalpe: "Yeah (laughs), me too."
Well...looks like I may see a familiar face when I head to the Queen City on Friday after all.
The Canes on Tuesday reassigned Dalpe to the Charlotte Checkers, who play three times during the NHL All-Star break beginning tonight in Norfolk and continuing with a back-to-back set Thursday and Friday against Rockford at Time Warner Cable Arena.
But don't panic. The Canes did this last year too, sending Zach Boychuk to Charlotte during the All-Star break to keep him fresh. I'd be stunned if Dalpe wasn't on the shuttle back to Raleigh next weekend. In all honesty, Justin Faulk likely would have been reassigned too had he not been selected to participate in All-Star weekend in Ottawa.
The release from the team is after the jump.
HURRICANES REASSIGN ZAC DALPE TO CHARLOTTE
Forward played in three games during most recent NHL recall
RALEIGH, NC – Jim Rutherford, President and General Manager of the National Hockey League’s Carolina Hurricanes, today announced that the team has reassigned forward Zac Dalpe to the Charlotte Checkers of the American Hockey League (AHL).
Dalpe, 22, played in all three of Carolina’s game following his Jan. 18 recall from Charlotte. Thus far this season, the Paris, Ont., native has played in 16 NHL games with the Hurricanes, scoring one goal and earning two assists (3 points). In 23 AHL games this season with Charlotte, Dalpe (6’1", 195 lbs.) has notched nine goals and earned seven assists (16 points). The Hurricanes drafted Dalpe in the second round, 45th overall, in the 2008 NHL Entry Draft.
20 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Ah man. I have to work tomorrow. That’s the last game for them in Norfolk isn’t it?
The only easy day was yesterday.
by CoastalCane on Jan 24, 2012 12:16 PM EST up reply actions
I may be going up for the Public Safety Appreciation night next week. I’m not sure about that yet. I was really hoping to get up there and see Charlotte but I guess it isn’t gonna happen this year.
The only easy day was yesterday.
Whoops…yep, you’re right. Clearly I didn’t do well in kindergarten with the days of the week.
by Brian LeBlanc on Jan 24, 2012 2:49 PM EST up reply actions
my wife is having surgery on her eye tomorrow otherwise
we’d would like to go for thursday & fridays games in Charlotte…so who ever goes…have fun !! And dalpe will be back ..sooner than Boychuk will !! :-)
9/11/01 - Never Forget !!
Long Live #63 The Condor
Go Canes & Checkers !!!
My best to your wife, Steve, hope all goes well :)
by Jamie Kellner on Jan 24, 2012 4:48 PM EST up reply actions
Nitpicking is totally fine. That picture came up when I searched for pictures including Dalpe, and apparently someone screwed up the caption. I’ll change the picture now.
by Brian LeBlanc on Jan 24, 2012 7:30 PM EST up reply actions
Game Report
Well the Checkers won 4-2. We looked good offensively the back end…. Well, My son’s comment was : “The Ardmirals have a much better goalie and their defense is better too, but our offense makes up for it and is a lot better than theirs.”
Genral observations:
Muse is a small goalie—if they could have shot high, man it was open—and that’s right where the Admirals first goal went. Good first sshot stopper, but left lots of rebounds in inopportune places—but for team team cleaned most of them up.
Our defense is not physical—less than McBain overall—passed up many opportunities to pnich/hip check/stop forwards coming down the boards. It’s a stick checking defense, and it explains a lot of the comebacks against us—our defense when pressed isn’t physical enough to withstand pressure. We have to score. But our four lines worth of offense looked good and balanced—still not all that physical either, but speedy.
Individuals:
Dadonov—showed pretty good board work, won puck battles, controlled posession (puck sticks like glue with him) Had some good shots—which led to the first goal on a tough shot for the goalie to hanlde: Sutter put it in from mid air. Would like to see his shot a bit more to see how accurate he can be, like to see him look to take more shots. Needs defensive work, but not unlike most AHL forwards.
Dalpe—Mixed game. Showed nice speed and some accurate passing—doesn’t stick handle much. Seemed out of place half the game, but at other times looked dynamic. That’s when I thought it could be do to position: Previously I always saw him play as a center—this game even in the AHL he was played predominantly at wing—he looked best when he was played at Center, which he did for the Power Play and for a only couple of shifts. It seems to me his transition to winger isn’t as easy as he thought it would be. He had two nice shots—one was a very good save against.
Bowman—good game in all zones, nice redirection of Sang’s pass for a PP goal.
Boychuck—WTF. Dude moved his feet less than any other player on the ice. Both zones tended to camp in spots. The puck rarely found him, he rarely fought to go and get the puck. When he did get the puck while hanging in his spot he got off a very quick and pretty shot, but it was saved. Nice release and accuracy—not seeing the Skinner like drive and desire to get the puck and make things happen. I wouldn’t call him up at this stage. But it was one game.
Nash—Solid game, but not much offensive flair.
Sutter—played as top line center, looked good, but not like the 4th liner we saw up here—guess that’s why it took him time to adapt and to tell Muller he could give more.
Terry—Nice shots, rang a couple off posts, but small, not quite NHL ready to me, needs more strength, but works harder than Boychuk who has more skill.
Sanguinetti. Good offensively, very McBain like defensively, less physical than McBain and smaller and weaker. Less prone to the yips than McBain when pressed in the corners. Smooth skater but did not appear particularly fast.
None of the defenseman stood out as being NHL candidates. Mical Jordan looked the best two way type guy overall, composed, very Harrison like before Harrison developed to what he is today.
Jenks looked fairly good sized and did a very nice job as a 4th liner. But it was AHL, not thinking he’s NHL 4th line yet, but I was pleassantly surprised—I wasn’t expecting much.
Fun game to go to.
Admirals Game
I also watched the Admirals game on AHL Live. I had very, very similar impressions of the players. I probably would put the defense as much more physical than you described, especially Rissanen. Sanguinetti, also, in my view played more solidly defensively than you described. With respect to Boychuk, I don’t understand why he plants himself so often and watches the play go on around him. By not keeping his feet moving, he undermines the speed that he has. I’m mystified and found myself mumbling to myself throughout the game, “Zach, move your feet, dude.” I still have hope for Boychuk, and I wonder what is going on with him. Surely, he looks at the video of the games. It’s a habit he can break and needs to break. On the other hand, Boychuk again took advantage of the times he got to the puck in the offensive zone, so once he gets the puck on his stick, he can make good things happen.
Dadonov is very strong on his skates and with the puck, as you described. He keeps the puck on a string and is able to weave through traffic. He has a slight bit of a tendency not to push the pace, but to wait for opportunities to arise and then takes full advantage of them. He is on the line with Brett Sutter and Boychuk. I think he is still getting a feel for the team and how they want him to play; but he is quite good. He plays a physical style of game and wins pucks battles. I do feel Dadonov has another level he can get to. I don’t see how both Boychuk and Dadonov can both make it up to the Hurricanes in the top six; but maybe I am wrong.
Puzzled a bit
Does anyone feel that the Canes will EVER obtain a player that possesses TRUE toughness, a TRUE ENFORCER who will protect and stand up for his teammates in a way that will deter opponents from taking shots at them, and do those things without committing stupid penalties? Yes, I know the Canes have stepped up their physicality along with their game lately, but I just feel that having a true enforcer, while he may not be the most skilled hockey player, would enable the team to take their newly increased level of physicality further without too much fear of reprisals with a presence like that around! They missed a GOLDEN opportunity to obtain one of the BEST enforcers I’ve ever seen at the NHL and minor league levels when the Pens placed Steve MacIntyre on waivers on January 11 and sent him back to W-B/Scranton after clearing them. Now he’s been called back up. We could have gotten him cheap on a two-way contract. That said, I’m a bit biased on this and would have LOVED seeing the Canes send Big Mac to Charlotte when and if they didn’t need him in Raleigh! He’s one bad hombre. Check out “Steve MacIntyre Fights” on YouTube. Gleason is tough, but he’s no match for MacIntyre!
Fights are way down in the league these days. Most teams now do not have an enforcer. Most have what we do: One or two players who stand up for the team. We are still not a big team, but we are much bigger than last year.
Without willing dance partners, with the instigator rule in place, this type of player is more liability than advantage for the team. As long as we do not go the Buffalo route and stand around when our goalie is leveled, then we’re doing OK. Our games since Muller joined and started gettng the team to play as a team, play for each other, has also helped increase the team standing up for our guys. We’ve faced tough teams and stood up well recently, with everyone pitching in.
So no, I doubt we will ever go out and get a true enforcer unless he can really play and contribute as a hockey player in our system. The closest we have now is Allen, Gleason second. But Harrison also answers the call when needed.
Good Point
You are right about fighting being way down, but, MacIntyre generally doesn’t go around instigating fights, thus, committing stupid penalties. He is, however, ready, willing, and more than able to accept a challenge from ANYONE, and he’ll try to TALK someone into “going”. The point is that his reputation precedes him, so, first, he won’t have many willing “takers”, and, two, he WILL WIN 99.9% of his fights handily and the opposition KNOWS this and you have to wonder if they would be as willing as they might be to get chippy or take shots at players like Skinner. I guarantee you that if Big Mac been playing in Edmonton when Skins got his concussion from Sutton’s elbow to the head and got suspended for the hit on Ponikarovski, he probably WOULDN’T have made those hits. Why, because even a cheap shot artist knows with MacIntyre around, he’d pay for it and probably dearly. I’d say it’s debatable as to whether he would be more of a liability than an asset. I do know this, though, all it would take would be one good Big Mac ass whipping on an opponent for word to get out to start refilling many of those empty seats I see at RBC Center when I come to Raleigh. Hey, it may simply bring out curiosity seekers, but it’s still ticket sales and extra revenue for the team, and provide even more excitement for the loyalists. That aspect is definitely NOT a liability. I’ll say it again that we’d LOVE to see him back in Charlotte, as he was one of the most popular fan favorites we’ve ever had. Go Canes AND Checkers!!!
by #1checkersfan on Jan 25, 2012 2:27 PM EST up reply actions
Checkers Thursday and Friday
For all Canes fans in Raleigh and surrounding areas, I would love to see as many of you that are hockey “starved” in Charlotte for our 2 game set with Rockford! The Thursday game is Harris Teeter VIC card night and you can get $5 off any seat in the house by showing your card at the box office. Friday is Race Night, and team officials are anticipating the biggest crowd of the season, so if you don’t want to sit upstairs, you’d better go to the Checkers website at www.GoCheckers.com or call 704-343-4423 and buy your tickets early. Warning, you will want to eat and down a few cold ones BEFORE the game because the concessions at TWC Arena are WORSE than at RBC!!! If you can get downtown by 4:30 or 5pm, there are plenty of good, reasonably priced sports bars/restaurants within a 2 block radius of the Arena. The Epicentre is just across the light rail line behind the arena with very close walking distance and offers several good choices such as Mortimer’s, Wild Wing Cafe, Jason’s Deli, Moe’s, and Five Guys, etc. For those of you who like to imbibe on alcohol, I have a well kept (by me) secret! You can drink almost free if you’re a bit sneaky! The Checkers have a “Sign up To BE a Designated Driver” deal ( you won’t be asked to really be a designated driver) where if you sign up, you can win a prize pack from Bud Light. The sign-up table is just off to the right from the Main entrance and you fill out a form. At the bottom of the form, there’s a coupon for a FREE small fountain soda at the concession stands that you tear off and redeem there!! Just snatch a few extra (5-6) forms to obtain extra coupons to use for the sodas, bring your own choice of liquor in an ALL plastic flask or all plastic mini bottles that the metal detectors won’t pick up,take a few sips from the soda and go in the bathroom and pour your liquor in, stir with the straw, and put the lid back on!!! Also, Thursdays are a “Wet Your Whistle” weeknight and you can get $3.50 12oz. Bud Lights! Come on down, Canes fans and watch the young guns play. It’s not nearly as expensive as Canes tickets, and we’d love to have you!!!

by 




















