10 Keys For The Hurricanes In 2012
The past year has brought both good and bad to the Carolina Hurricanes. The NHL All-Star Game was a huge success, showcasing the area as a legitimate hockey market. Jeff Skinner took home the Calder Memorial Trophy as the league's top rookie. And GM Jim Rutherford was able to keep several key unrestricted free agents at a reasonable cost. On the bad side, Paul Maurice lost his job here for the second time, Eric Staal struggled, the Tomas Kaberle era came and went, and the team failed to make the 2011 postseason and saw its start to the 2011-12 campaign make a return to the playoffs in 2012 unlikely.
What will come in 2012 is a mystery, but there are definite pressing issues as the Canes embark on a new year.
1. Getting Skinner Healthy. The Hurricanes got great news this week when Skinner returned to practice (in a non-contact jersey), but the big test will come once Skinner is back on the ice. The fear of concussions is at an understandable all-time high, but the Canes seem to be taking every precaution with their concussed players and not rushing them back. That could be the difference between being the next Eric Lindros, whose promising career was cut short by injury, or the next Brandon Sutter, who has bounced back from a concussion his rookie season and shown no ill effects.
2. Defense Decisions. Joni Pitkanen's concussion has kept the choices on defense relatively easy. With seven healthy D, new coach Kirk Muller has, for the most part, dressed his top six and scratched Derek Joslin. The decisions going forward — for Muller and Rutherford — won't be as easy. Once Pitkanen is healthy, Muller will need to decide who the odd-man out is on the blue line. Does he potentially stunt Jamie McBain's growth by scratching Carolina's young rearguard? And what of impending veteran UFAs Tim Gleason, Bryan Allen and Jaroslav Spacek? All three could bring a deadline return (more on this later), but Rutherford will need to decide who fits into the team's future plans. Ryan Murphy, the team's top pick in 2011, could be ready for the NHL as early as next year, and Rutherford won't want to make the same mistake he made this year when he signed Kaberle without realizing that rookie Justin Faulk would be ready for a major role.
3. Backup Success. Jan. 9, 2011. That's the last time someone other than Cam Ward has won a game between the pipes for the Hurricanes, when Justin Peters defeated Atlanta, a team that no longer exists. The addition of Brian Boucher was supposed to alleviate the issue, but Boucher was 0-4-1 in seven games before going down with a lower body injury. It's gotten so bad that rookie Mike Murphy lost his first ever NHL appearance, in relief of Ward, without even allowing a goal.
4. Muller's Way. Carolina's already showing a different playing style under its new coach, but Muller will need to time to implement exactly what he wants his team to do on a nightly basis. That may not fully come to fruition until next year's training camp, but so far the Hurricanes are making strides in transitioning from Maurice's systems to Muller's.
5. Wing Man. A top priority for Rutherford and Muller is finding the proper linemates for Staal. The latest to audition is rookie Zac Dalpe, who so far has looked OK alongside the Carolina captain. With a lot of money coming off the books this offseason, Rutherford will have plenty of options — be it by trade or free agency — plus Muller could try Skinner, Jokinen or others alongside Staal.
6. Deadline Purge. As mentioned above, Carolina will have assets to peddle at the trade deadline. With the playoffs seemingly already out of reach, the Canes could shop several of their players to try and expedite their rebuild. Don't be surprised if two of Allen, Gleason and Spacek are gone, and Alexei Ponikarovsky is all but assured to be dealt to a team in need of third-line scoring help. The biggest decision will swirl around Tuomo Ruutu, who is in the final year of his hefty contract and is putting together a big year with unrestricted free agency looming. Can Carolina afford to lose him? If they traded him, could they re-sign him in the offseason? And would he be worth a deal worth probably more than the $3.8 million he averaged the last three seasons? Ruutu is entering his prime (he'll be 29 in February), but the physical nature of his play and history of injuries could mean he has more miles on him than most 29-year-olds.
7. Drafting Wisely. While it hasn't yet translated into a ton of on-ice production, the Hurricanes have drafted well the past half decade. If Ryan Murphy winds up as good as expected, the Canes will have hit home runs in back-to-back years. The Canes need to do it again. All signs point to Carolina picking in the top 10 again, if not the top five or even three. Throw in whatever draft assets are stockpiled at the deadline, and the Hurricanes need a big year at the draft table.
8. Surviving Realignment. Rutherford seems genuinely pleased that the Canes were grouped with big gate draws like the Rangers, Flyers, Penguins and Capitals (oh, and the Devils and Islanders). But four of those teams rank in the NHL's top 10 in player payroll spending this season, and only the Isles spend less than Carolina among the teams in the new conference. Dollars don't equal dubyas, but the Hurricanes face an uphill battle in what is arguably the toughest conference in the new-look format.
9. Sutter Rising. It's fast becoming time to see what kind of player Brandon Sutter is going to be. Everyone knows he's already among the league's best defensive forwards, now the question becomes if he's more like John Madden or Rod Brind`Amour. There's no shame in being the next Madden, a winner who would score around 25-40 points per year while making life a living hell for top lines for more than a decade. But if Sutter can evolve into the type of scoring threat Brind`Amour became, the Hurricanes will have one of the best one-two punches down the middle in the NHL.
10. Wither Jokinen. As Carolina's most versatile forward, Jokinen has played just about everywhere on the ice in every situation. But if the Canes are going to thrive, they need a permanent home for the Finnish dynamo. Ideally, that would be at left wing, the position where Jokinen is most comfortable. That would also mean Carolina had found a suitable second line center (see No. 1, No. 7 or No. 9), and getting Jokinen back on the wing could also help out immensely with No. 5. In a lot of ways, the path taken — or given — to Jokinen is the most pivotal to the Hurricanes' short-term success.
30 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
that team (in #3) exists
they play in Winnipeg now. Although apparently the locals try to pretend they don’t
If I cared more about my UNC side, I'd call myself "Tar Volon," and that'd be awesome.
Bolts, Canes, Preds (now in different conferences!). Canes mini-STH. Southern hockey solidarity
Rocky Top Talk
by Incipient_Senescence on Jan 3, 2012 3:05 PM EST reply actions
Your 10 Pressing Issues
Great concise list and captures the essence of what the Canes are facing when they move forward from this point.
Although I am not suggesting there is an 11th issues there is certainly a number of questions I have had concerning the Canes budget moving forward. If the Canes are losing money operationally it would be hard to increase the player payroll. There are questions that I think might directly relate to a good number of the above issues. It goes something like this:
The Canes have new minority owners who have already invested perhaps about $20MM in new money. The reported numbers are a bit fuzzy and totals are not precise. PK is on record as saying he would like an additional $20mm more investment within 6-12 months which may come from the same investors or new investors or a combination. What are the Canes going to do with this $20mm now and the additional $20mm hopefully coming soon? Will some of this new money go to a revised budget for player payroll for 2012-13 and beyond?
So it is said that if you know your enemies and know yourself, you can win a hundred battles without a single loss.
If you only know yourself, but not your opponent, you may win or may lose.
If you know neither yourself nor your enemy, you will always endanger yourself.
Sun Tzu circa 4th Century BC
I was under the impression that this new money simply lessens JR’s financial burden – by taking on the portion his business partner owned prior to his death a few years ago, which JR took on when he passed. It’s been said that this new money will NOT change the payroll or the way the team operates. If I’m incorrect – someone please let me know!
That is correct. Mr. Thewes was PKs minor partner. His banner hangs in the RBC rafters. Apparently his estate was patient in recieving their investment back. There was never $20mil added to the Canes operating budget, but an accounting liability was dropped off the Canes books. Or PK paid the liability out of the Canes retained earnings and has repaid that loan. Whatever the case PK is not a philantropist who funds the Canes for our entertainment. He is a businessman first and a Canes fan second.
#11 - Getting a New GM
JR has failed miserably three seasons in a row, partially redeeming himself with a new coaching staff from outside the organization. He basically has the second half of this season to audition for his job; if he can purge the team and get good return and set the team up as a buyer in the off-season, he can stay. If he sits on all our UFAs and simply does not resign or trade Ruutu, someone will have to explain to me logically why, in a normal NHL market, he would be allowed to keep his jog.
I CAN'T BELIEVE STAAL FINALLY SCORED!!!
He’s not going anywhere until he wants to. That just needs to be accepted.
by Cory Lavalette on Jan 3, 2012 3:40 PM EST up reply actions
Not to say you have to like it … but he’s not being replaced.
by Cory Lavalette on Jan 3, 2012 3:41 PM EST up reply actions
yeah...
even if he was gotten rid of as you want – he’ll still be a partial owner of the team. despite his boneheaded move of signing kaberle this season, I think he’s done a good job. I have my gripes, i.e. not re-signing Cole and keeping Veterans like Ray Whitney who despite his age, is having an amazing season this year so far…
Ready for the Canes to win the Cup again! :)
Hard to say when a Hockey player will lose his value.
At the beginning of last season I saw a lot of comments saying that Cole was washed up, then he had a good year, now everyone thinks he’s worth an expensive 4 year contract.
Then there was Brind’mor, his contract was 2 years to long, yes he had the knee injury, but at his age he couldn’t recover.
Whitney is 39 years old, he might have a couple more good years but that’s probably it.
by CanesFanFromLI on Jan 3, 2012 4:37 PM EST up reply actions
JR's deals..
For the most part he has done well with the budget given to him. Every now and then he will swing and miss(kaberle) but for everyone of those there are 4-5 where he hit the home run. He will trade some of these UFA’s but the big one is Ruutu. He is a fan favorite but by far would land the biggest “prizes” at the deadline. Not sure there is a right or wrong answer on him.
I think #11 should be bringing up the young players and seeing what they can do at this level. I know some may want them to stay in Charlotte but I would rather they play up here and lets see who can stick or not so there are no questions on them for 2012-13.
They can only do so much with the roster right now (re: young players), but Muller has definitely shown a willingness to give those guys a shot. I think moving out some D at the deadline could give a guy like Sanguinetti a shot to see if he has anything to give at this level. He’ll be 24 soon and an RFA.
by Cory Lavalette on Jan 3, 2012 4:11 PM EST up reply actions
Yeah I think that they will get the chance at some point this year… especially after the deadline 2-3 forwards will be moved. 1-3 D will be moved as well. Thats not saying we wont get back some players in return. Im sure we will have some excitement at the end of the year with some young unproven players getting a chance.
BTW.. is this the legendary Matt Katlen that played Goalie for the Renegades? That was a great championship franchise, its a shame we couldn’t keep that team together under the Cap.
BTW.. is this the legendary Matt Katlen that played Goalie for the Renegades? That was a great championship franchise, its a shame we couldn’t keep that team together under the Cap.
Salary cap min
Because we’re near the salary cap minimum, there’s a limit to how many players we can trade away, even if we bring players up to the max of 23 to add their salaries.
I have been saying this for a while.
Just remember that later in the year its easier to trade away players with higher pay as their games played is prorated.
Poni is sure to get dealt. Allen Gleason and Spacek… 2 of the 3 could be gone. 50/50 on Ruutu
Remember when we picked up Allen? We gave Florida Sammy. They just took him to clear the books as he was a UFA and Allen had a bit more on his deal. We could do the same this year.
by RobbinDollar on Jan 4, 2012 10:01 AM EST up reply actions
Thanks Cory !! you hit a Home run on this
And for the record the canes need to keep Ruutu at the deadline because and even IF JR were to talk to Ruutu prior to being traded as a rest of the year rental there is No garuntee Ruutu would want to return to the Canes for treating him like a slab of meat..Ruutu knows & understands the business side of the NHL,but he is also a human being with feeling too..and no Ruutu is no freakin wimp either…but he like all of us here have feelings and we all have had are feeling hurt from time to time in life to where we looked at the person who did that to us very differently..and defencivly too as not to be trusted type of thing…that is what I asm refering to…Thanks again Cory..Great way to stasrt the new year off !!
9/11/01 - Never Forget !!
Long Live #63 The Condor
Go Canes & Checkers !!!
Couldn’t JR approach Ruutu and give him the option? Tell him we’ll let him compete for the Cup, but we’ll do whatever it takes to re-sign him next year. If Ruutu says he wants to stay, then make him a multi-year offer.
by CanesFanFromLI on Jan 3, 2012 4:40 PM EST up reply actions
I am not sure that the NHL rules allow a GM to negotiate a future contract with a player who then becomes the property of some other team before that contract agreement, verbal or otherwise, kicks in….sounds like tampering but I am not sure. Any enlightenment for someone who knows?
So it is said that if you know your enemies and know yourself, you can win a hundred battles without a single loss.
If you only know yourself, but not your opponent, you may win or may lose.
If you know neither yourself nor your enemy, you will always endanger yourself.
Sun Tzu circa 4th Century BC
by hurricanefever on Jan 4, 2012 10:02 AM EST up reply actions
Oops sorry. Last sentence should read:
“Any enlightenment from someone out there that knows these rules?”
Not enough coffee this morning after a restless night dreaming of that frustrating game I saw last night. My bad.
So it is said that if you know your enemies and know yourself, you can win a hundred battles without a single loss.
If you only know yourself, but not your opponent, you may win or may lose.
If you know neither yourself nor your enemy, you will always endanger yourself.
Sun Tzu circa 4th Century BC
by hurricanefever on Jan 4, 2012 10:07 AM EST up reply actions
I would guess that that would equate to tampering. But there’s no reason Rutherford couldn’t negotiate now, trade him, then call on July 1 and say, “Remember that offer I made? It still stands.”
by Cory Lavalette on Jan 4, 2012 12:33 PM EST up reply actions
Ah……..I see the distinction……..as long as no contact by JR is made while the player is under contract with the other team then everything is OK…….but all bets are off come July 1 and the player has not resigned with the new team. Makes sense.
So it is said that if you know your enemies and know yourself, you can win a hundred battles without a single loss.
If you only know yourself, but not your opponent, you may win or may lose.
If you know neither yourself nor your enemy, you will always endanger yourself.
Sun Tzu circa 4th Century BC
by hurricanefever on Jan 4, 2012 2:51 PM EST up reply actions
So, you would rather risk loosing Ruutu for nothing then get a first Rd pick for him?
Remember Ray? Think how nicely a 1st rd pick would look now.. lets say Ray waived the deal we had for him to go to LA . The deal was for a 1st and a 2nd, We would have Derek Forbort and Tyler Toffoli as prospects and both are probably looking to make the jump to the NHL in the next year or so. Then again maybe we wouldn’t have drafted the same players that they did but maybe we could have done better. Maybe gotten a Zucker or a Smith-Pelly in the 2nd rd. Would that give us the freedom and assets to go out and make the trade to get Bobby Ryan? I would think if we had Smith -Pelly and Forbort offered up to the ducks in a Trade for Ryan that they would jump at the chance. Rumors have linked Evander Kane to the trade market… how great would he be for us? I would love to have those assets to either develope or use as negotiating pieces.
I would hate to loose Ruutu just like I hated loosing Cole but I would rather get something for him then watch him leave us for nothing like Cole and Ray did.
Is Ruutu worth Bobby Ryan’s money, because thats what he is going to get? I personally think Cole was more valuable to us than Ruutu is. Cole is Getting 4.5 and we wouldn’t pay him that and I suspect Ruutu will want 5+ a year. With all of that in consideration I would be happy walking away from Ruutu now and getting some picks/prospects in the deal especially with a fairly deep draft year looming.
I would be really happy if we traded Ruutu and used that cap room to sign a Parise, Grabovski, or Hemsky next year. We can fill the physical role with a much cheaper option and would have a pick/prospect for him.
Yes I am a Ruutu fan, love his game. Just remember we only have 3 players remaining from our cup win. Turnover in hockey is high… the hope is we get better. Im happy in whatever move JR makes to get there.
It may have been previously mentioned and I missed it, but nonetheless…
Canes Web Producer Michael Smith published a December 2011 Monthly Report today on the Canes website. It contains a few player quotes and insight from Kirk Muller, but there are also quite a few quotes from JR as to his perspective of the status of the team, and the upcoming trade period.
Worth a look IMO.
twitter @jbk_ltd
My (Probably stupid) point of view
It seems to me that the teams (all sports) who are most successful build from within. You keep a solid core of players and you bring in prospects when they are ready. By bringing in several new players from outside the system each year, the team never has a chance to “gel”. I think our biggest mistake was letting Ladd, Whitney, Cole and Cullen go. If we could have kept them and worked in Skinner, Dalphe, Boychuck etc., We would be in great shape now.
JR did exactly what you say he didn’t do after the Stanley Cup win. those guys were all playing for the Canes the next season (all but Cullen, who got a great offer, but was traded back). How well did that go? Back then he was accused of not making enough changes.
The only things I think we can now criticize JR for are the contract of Staal and Ward that are biting this team in the ass right now, and hancuffing the rest of the payroll. In ’06 we all thought it made sense to sign these players, that markets like this one, seem to lose, to lucrative long term contract. Now they look like boat anchors.

by 
























