Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Trent Richardson Interviews Fellow Brown Brandon Weeden

Tim Gleason Signs Four-Year, $16 Million Extension With Carolina Hurricanes

The Carolina Hurricanes locked up gritty defenseman Tim Gleason for the foreseeable future Monday, signing the alternate captain to a four-year extension worth a combined $16 million. (Photo by Jamie Kellner)

The Carolina Hurricanes have made few exceptions when it comes to in-season contract negotiations, but Tim Gleason is apparently one worth making an exception for.

The Canes signed their alternate captain to a four-year extension Monday that will pay the defenseman $16 million over the course of the contract. The deal will pay Gleason $3.5 million a season in the first and last year of the deal, and $4.5 million in each of the remaining years. Under the current collective bargaining agreement, his cap hit would be $4 million each season.

The move takes Gleason, who is in his sixth season in Raleigh, off the list of trade deadline possibilities. Furthermore, TSN's Bob McKenzie reports, via Twitter, that Gleason's deal has a full no-trade clause for the first two seasons of the new contract.

The release from the Hurricanes is after the jump.

Star-divide

HURRICANES SIGN TIM GLEASON TO FOUR-YEAR EXTENSION

Defenseman signed to remain a Hurricane through the 2015-16 season

RALEIGH, NC – Jim Rutherford, President and General Manager of the National Hockey League’s Carolina Hurricanes, today announced that the team has signed defenseman Tim Gleason to a four-year contract extension. The deal will pay Gleason $3.5 million in 2012-13, $4.5 million in 2013-14 and 2014-15 and $3.5 million in 2015-16.

"We thank Tim for choosing to stay with the Hurricanes long term," said Rutherford. "He is one of our core players, someone who brings character and leadership to our locker room, along with being a key piece on the ice. This is a very important signing for our team going forward."

Gleason, 29, is in his eighth NHL season and sixth with the Hurricanes, and currently leads all Hurricanes defensemen in hits (87), plus/minus (+2) and total minutes played (1,063). He ranks second among Carolina blueliners in assists (13) and penalty minutes (44), and third in points (14), skating in all 51 games for the team this season.

Originally acquired from the Los Angeles Kings along with Eric Belanger in exchange for Oleg Tverdovsky and Jack Johnson, Gleason has totaled 86 points (13g, 73a) and 416 penalty minutes in 401 games with the Hurricanes. The Clawson, MI, native has led Carolina defensemen in hits each of the past four seasons (2007-08 to 2010-11), ranking fifth among NHL defensemen in hits last season. A first-round selection (23rd overall) of the Ottawa Senators in the 2001 NHL Entry Draft, Gleason (6’0", 217 lbs.) played his 500th NHL game on Nov. 27 at Ottawa, and has totaled 15 goals, 99 assists (114 points) and 514 penalty minutes in 526 career NHL games with Los Angeles and Carolina.

Comment 195 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

well...

guess we’ll be trading one of our other defenseman then. :x

also waiting to see news about Ruutu today…

Ready for the Canes to win the Cup again! :)

by thebl4ckd0g on Jan 30, 2012 12:47 PM EST reply actions  

so much for cleaning house, guess we’ll suck again next year and just miss the playoffs again. once more, no need for season tix…sigh…BRING BACK MO! BRING BACK MO! BRING BACK MO!!!

"I need to make sure I don't get too frustrated and stay focused on my game...The points and the offense, you have to believe, are going to come." - Eric Staal, 11/6/2011

by Capt. Stinky on Jan 30, 2012 12:52 PM EST reply actions  

I usually enjoy your snark and find it funny but I’m going to have to disagree with ya on this one Stinky. I don’t consider him a weak link of our defense and he’s looked good under Muller’s system to me.

The reason we’re not in the playoffs is due to Kabs and all the bottom 6 forwards JR picked up at the WalMart free agency bin in the offseason. Well, Mo didn’t help out much either. Our D without Gleason or Allen next year was going to look absolutely atrocious. The weak points of our D are Joslin, McBain, Spacek/Kabs.

I know Gleason isn’t what he was during his Olympic year but he’s not as bad as was towards the end of last year or as bad as some make him out to be.

Just my two cents…

"I'm not going to waste my time with Tuukka Rask" - Cam Ward

by anonymousJ on Jan 30, 2012 1:28 PM EST up reply actions  

Agreed

I’m very happy that Gleason is going to be sticking around long-term, especially at the relatively light cap hit of $4mil, I think on the open market he could have easily gotten more.

Also good for Tim in basically setting himself up for life before he is 30, assuming he doesn’t blow all the money on bad investments or something. NHL contracts are fully guaranteed.

by Kubota on Jan 30, 2012 2:10 PM EST up reply actions  

Gleason has looked good since he’s been paired with Allen. If he goes, I expect Timmay to have another down year…

"I need to make sure I don't get too frustrated and stay focused on my game...The points and the offense, you have to believe, are going to come." - Eric Staal, 11/6/2011

by Capt. Stinky on Jan 30, 2012 2:33 PM EST up reply actions  

You could be right on that. I’m holding out hope that he’s rounding back into form and will be fine without Allen. Like I’ve said, I don’t think it’s the best move ever made but I just don’t think it’s nearly as bad as some are making it out to be. I guess we’ll all find out a year from now though.

"I'm not going to waste my time with Tuukka Rask" - Cam Ward

by anonymousJ on Jan 30, 2012 2:43 PM EST up reply actions  

C’mon Stink, this is a good move. He’s plus 2 on a team where only Stewart (3) and Jokinen (1) are in positive numbers. If you look at the numbers other defensemen are signing for, this is a bargain. Also, other teams are keeping their best defensemen as they are hard to come by. Hang with us Stink, this will work out.

I agree with you that Allen is playing well and have previously written on his value to the team. It wouldn’t bother me if we resigned him also.

by FoxtrotSierra on Jan 30, 2012 3:48 PM EST up reply actions  

every veteran of a multiple non-playoff year team that we re-sign takes away a potential upgrade via grade. keeping timmay and not getting new blood in here keeps us status-quo

"I need to make sure I don't get too frustrated and stay focused on my game...The points and the offense, you have to believe, are going to come." - Eric Staal, 11/6/2011

by Capt. Stinky on Jan 31, 2012 7:50 AM EST up reply actions  

So it's impossible to contribute to a competitior if you haven't in your recent history?

That seems a bit short-sighted.

Personal attacks are the weapon of the ignorant.

Panthers '011: This is what we've been waiting for...we get to overpay the core of a 2-14 team!

by MichaelProcton on Jan 31, 2012 12:29 PM EST up reply actions  

"The reason we’re not in the playoffs is due to Kabs and all the bottom 6 forwards JR picked up at the WalMart free agency bin in the offseason"

All of this is directly related to the budget.

Personal attacks are the weapon of the ignorant.

Panthers '011: This is what we've been waiting for...we get to overpay the core of a 2-14 team!

by MichaelProcton on Jan 30, 2012 2:42 PM EST up reply actions  

I like this……..I am wrong about JR…..I thought he was stubborn…..the guy can adapt if he needs to adapt. Good for you JR!

I guess that also means that Ruutu was contacted and JR did found out he wanted more than he was willing to pay. Mr Bruce of the Sun was correct…….goodness the world is coming to an end………

Hold out baits to entice the enemy. Feign disorder, and crush him.
Sun Tzu circa 4th Century BC

by hurricanefever on Jan 30, 2012 12:53 PM EST reply actions  

So we plead poverty under the new CBA and then sign a guy clearly on the downswing of his career to a 4 year deal. Makes perfect sense to me.

I believe in strength. I believe in unity. And if that strength, that unity of purpose, demands a uniformity of thought, word and deed then so be it.

by Douchebag St John on Jan 30, 2012 1:00 PM EST reply actions  

I haven't been watching Carolina that long

but it’s awful strange to call a 29 year old defenseman “clearly on the downswing of his career”

If I cared more about my UNC side, I'd call myself "Tar Volon," and that'd be awesome.
Bolts, Canes, Preds (now in different conferences!). Canes mini-STH. Southern hockey solidarity
Rocky Top Talk

by Incipient_Senescence on Jan 30, 2012 1:04 PM EST up reply actions   2 recs

He hasn’t been " good " for the last two seasons. He is not the Tim Gleason of 08-09 or even 09-10. Just my opinion, but since it isnt " ra ra yaaaaayyy! " I am sure its " wrong ".

I believe in strength. I believe in unity. And if that strength, that unity of purpose, demands a uniformity of thought, word and deed then so be it.

by Douchebag St John on Jan 30, 2012 1:07 PM EST up reply actions  

that's a fair point

like I said, I wasn’t watching in ’08, so I have no basis of comparison.

However, I would like to question whether it’s a down year or two or the downswing of a career. Defenseman very rarely slow down for good at 27. So do we have reason to think he’s going downhill for good, or should we think he steadily got worse under Mo’s tutelage and that the November change might bring him back to ’08 levels?

If I cared more about my UNC side, I'd call myself "Tar Volon," and that'd be awesome.
Bolts, Canes, Preds (now in different conferences!). Canes mini-STH. Southern hockey solidarity
Rocky Top Talk

by Incipient_Senescence on Jan 30, 2012 1:16 PM EST up reply actions  

So you think a more aggressive style that forces Gleason to defend more odd-man rushes and move the puck is going to make him better?

by Kahz on Jan 30, 2012 1:29 PM EST up reply actions  

I haven't been around long enough to figure out what to think about Gleason

I’m asking questions. Primarily among them, what caused him to fall off during what should be his prime, and what are the chances (or what will it take) he gets it back?

If I cared more about my UNC side, I'd call myself "Tar Volon," and that'd be awesome.
Bolts, Canes, Preds (now in different conferences!). Canes mini-STH. Southern hockey solidarity
Rocky Top Talk

by Incipient_Senescence on Jan 30, 2012 1:44 PM EST up reply actions  

There was an argument made last year

that a good chunk of the Canes’ defensive problems came out of the forward lines. (All the odd-man rushes? All the odd-man rushes.) I’m not good enough an analyst to make that case myself, but the offensive personnel certainly haven’t improved their defensive play this year.

Physical defensemen rarely stand out unless they’re injuring somebody. But the widely-publicized demand for him as a rental and the general agreement in hockey media that this is a fair price speak to his perceived value within the league.

That Hokie freshman in the Greensboro Coliseum rafters didn't see any of this coming.

by JoshCVT on Jan 30, 2012 5:02 PM EST up reply actions  

He hasn’t been good at times, but he isn’t even close to being on the downswing of his career. That’s ridiculous. There’s a reason that he would have been one of the top UFA defensemen. We are much, much better off with him than without him.

by hurricane9 on Jan 30, 2012 4:48 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

I agree about the last two year, though I think he has been a little better under muller, that doesn’t mean that much to me just yet.

I like him, but he’s definitely not the d-man you need to build your defense around. It’s not that the price is bad though (or not extraordinarily so), maybe it’s just…he’s not a difference maker, we keep re-signing people that are replaceable to stay on a team that is anything but impressive. Who is the key dman? gleason? pitkanen?

I am not a heavy drinker. I can sometimes go for hours without touching a drop --Noel Coward

by DaveLovesBier on Jan 30, 2012 5:42 PM EST up reply actions  

If you don't have solid complimentary pieces in place...

How are you going to sign a difference maker to a small market with limited funds to do so?

Personal attacks are the weapon of the ignorant.

Panthers '011: This is what we've been waiting for...we get to overpay the core of a 2-14 team!

by MichaelProcton on Jan 31, 2012 12:33 PM EST up reply actions  

I don't think the two are mutually exclusive at all.

Being a low-budget team demands you lock up solid players below market value when you can. This is just such a deal.

Personal attacks are the weapon of the ignorant.

Panthers '011: This is what we've been waiting for...we get to overpay the core of a 2-14 team!

by MichaelProcton on Jan 30, 2012 2:43 PM EST up reply actions  

Hey, at least Ray Whitney has a renter for another 4 years….

by Canesak on Jan 30, 2012 1:10 PM EST reply actions  

Puzzled

I could have sworn JR was leaning towards keeping Allen…. Allen blocks more shots, clears the crease better, and stands up for the team more often. Gleason of two seasons ago I’d like, but this year’s and last year’s Gleason?? Not sure I’d have locked him up…

This gets back to one of my comments that others have challenged…. I’m not confident JR makes many changes, and we lose some assets for nothing, or we tie up our limited budget on all the same people therefore no spots for prospects, no money for a new, true, top six forward….

…hope I’m wrong, but so far this is playing out like I expected. JR wants too much for our guys, so we’ll wind up with all of then next year, or we will not pay Ruu enough to stay and be short two top six forwards. Either way, unless our prospects finally step up, we’ll be the same team again next year but with a better coaching staff. So mayber we claw and scrape enough to make the playoffs or we’re bubble quality again.

by Squeaky83 on Jan 30, 2012 1:10 PM EST reply actions  

Such a dissapointing deal. Gleason is as good a D as the Canes are willing to overpay for the long-term. He truly has been a huge disappointment the past 2 years and shows no sign of improvement.

Bring on the mediocrity. So much for building a decent D core.

by JussiJuice on Jan 30, 2012 1:34 PM EST via mobile up reply actions  

This is NOT an overpayment.

He’d easily have gotten more on the FA market.

Personal attacks are the weapon of the ignorant.

Panthers '011: This is what we've been waiting for...we get to overpay the core of a 2-14 team!

by MichaelProcton on Jan 30, 2012 2:44 PM EST up reply actions  

You have any future lottery numbers I can get per chance?

by JussiJuice on Jan 30, 2012 2:49 PM EST via mobile up reply actions  

Yes.

You can also ask every other poster who has said the same thing, and Wyshynski.

Personal attacks are the weapon of the ignorant.

Panthers '011: This is what we've been waiting for...we get to overpay the core of a 2-14 team!

by MichaelProcton on Jan 30, 2012 3:04 PM EST up reply actions  

Multiple writers have said that this is a fair-deal and isn’t overpaying.

by hurricane9 on Jan 30, 2012 4:49 PM EST up reply actions  

If you are a Cup contender with a solid D core, this is a decent deal for a #4, 5, or 6 reliable shutdown D.

If you are the Canes, who have to spend every penny like it is their last, and this is money directly out of the fund for the actual #1 or #2 that they really need to compete… it is a mistake.

If the Canes still go out and find that #1 or #2 and shell out the $6 or so million a year to bring him in, I love this deal. I think the chances of that happening are the exact same as us picking up the true 1st line winger we have clearly needed every offseason in recent memory.

For quick example: would people here have been more happy with

A) Signing Gleason for $4 million and a classic JR bargain bin like Johnny Boychuk for $2 million to fill out our D next year

Or

B) Bring in Ryan Suter for $6 million and let Murphy, Sanguinetti, and Dumoulin fight it out for the last spot.

For me, B is the clear winner. Maybe everyone else feels differently. IMO, option A is on the way. As Sittler said, without adding a true #1 or #2 D to this roster in addition to Gleason, we are dead in the water next year.

by JussiJuice on Jan 30, 2012 5:17 PM EST via mobile up reply actions  

FWIW add A.Levi ,and Keegan Lowe to the fight it out scenario. Levi is a big kid right now at 6’ 4" and 205lb

by hellfish on Jan 30, 2012 5:28 PM EST up reply actions  

Fight it out scenario is nearly dead unfortunately for them. Id love to believe this is the year things change and JR will finally get the cash to fill out the team properly, but offseason after offseason of this hope while watching sums of money go to bargain bin scrubs when it could be piled together to get a proper player wears on one.

I would bet $10 to a donut that we sign a guy like Johnny Boychuk, the young D in the wings are screwed again, and we go into next year with:

Faulk – Harrison
Pitkanen – Gleason
Boychuk – McBain
Murphy/Dumoulin

Par for the course. Not to mention if we do in fact sign/acquire a proper #1 or #2 D at $6+ million a year we can forget about dreams of obtaining a true 1st line winger. JR better be praying we tank and can pick up a game-changer in the Draft.

by JussiJuice on Jan 30, 2012 5:38 PM EST via mobile up reply actions  

How many teams do you guys see with five All-Star caliber skaters and minor leaguers filling out the rest of the lineup?

Personal attacks are the weapon of the ignorant.

Panthers '011: This is what we've been waiting for...we get to overpay the core of a 2-14 team!

by MichaelProcton on Jan 31, 2012 12:35 PM EST up reply actions  

I want to know how you think you can get Ryan Suter for $6m. I think it will be closer to $8m.

by jbwhite99 on Jan 30, 2012 8:43 PM EST up reply actions  

+1

Agreed. Suter might take $6m to play on a team like Detroit but it’s unlikely he joins a weaker team at that price. I think Nashville can afford to offer him $6m and they’re probably a stronger team than we are.

by jfhammon on Jan 30, 2012 8:51 PM EST up reply actions  

this

he’s staying in Nashville unless he goes to a front-line Cup contender or becomes the highest paid player in the league

If I cared more about my UNC side, I'd call myself "Tar Volon," and that'd be awesome.
Bolts, Canes, Preds (now in different conferences!). Canes mini-STH. Southern hockey solidarity
Rocky Top Talk

by Incipient_Senescence on Jan 30, 2012 9:59 PM EST up reply actions  

The only team Suter will take $6M for is Nashville if he’ll take a hometown discount. I’d imagine he’ll be in more of the $7-8M range if he hits free agency.

"I'm not going to waste my time with Tuukka Rask" - Cam Ward

by anonymousJ on Jan 30, 2012 10:34 PM EST up reply actions  

Where are you guys seeing this? Just blind guesses?

Suter makes max $6-6.5 mil. No team in their right mind is going to pay a D outside of the top-10 $8 million. Id bet my house on it.

by JussiJuice on Jan 31, 2012 1:08 AM EST via mobile up reply actions  

In fact, doing a quick sanity check, almost everything I find suggests $6-7 million. Shea Weber is worth $8 million, probably the only D in the NHL worth that. Hell, Chara makes under $7 million. Absolutely zero chance Suter makes $8 million.

by JussiJuice on Jan 31, 2012 1:13 AM EST via mobile up reply actions  

You could be right but I’d imagine he’ll get around $7M or possibly a tad more. When I wrote 7-8, I didn’t mean definitely 8…

My point being that I don’t think there’s any way Suter is taking $6M to come play in Carolina. Maybe to play for a cup contender or to stay in Nashville, but I seriously doubt he’s taking that to come play for a team that hasn’t been in the playoffs a few years running.

"I'm not going to waste my time with Tuukka Rask" - Cam Ward

by anonymousJ on Jan 31, 2012 9:39 AM EST up reply actions  

I like this deal. One of the few Canes sporting a plus/minus in the positive. He’s a Cane, through and through.

www.prosportsblogging.com

by Great Ice-Pectations on Jan 30, 2012 1:12 PM EST reply actions  

will he help Carolina win enough games to get into the playoffs?

last two seasons, he has not. would’ve traded him for talent, picks, prospects in a heartbeat…

"I need to make sure I don't get too frustrated and stay focused on my game...The points and the offense, you have to believe, are going to come." - Eric Staal, 11/6/2011

by Capt. Stinky on Jan 30, 2012 1:16 PM EST up reply actions  

I dont think you can call him the achilles heel of this team’s defense.

www.prosportsblogging.com

by Great Ice-Pectations on Jan 30, 2012 1:18 PM EST up reply actions  

sure i can — he’s the achilles heel of this team’s defense. he’s slow, out of position, and shows no signs of improving on two very sub-par years. he has no offensive upside whatsoever as of late and on a team where we desperately need another top-six forward, he was expendable to say the least in a trade for such a player.

"I need to make sure I don't get too frustrated and stay focused on my game...The points and the offense, you have to believe, are going to come." - Eric Staal, 11/6/2011

by Capt. Stinky on Jan 30, 2012 1:23 PM EST up reply actions  

His plus minus is solid and before you tell me that the stat doesnt tell you anything, it does. Pitkanen, for instance has a shit plus minus and he score most of his points on the PP. You know what that is called? An even strength liability. Gleason is on course for a CAREER HIGH in points this season and while he might not be hitting as much as he used to, guys who play like Gleason are harder to find than you think. The Canes may need another top-6 fwd, but Gleason wasn’t going to get one unless he was bundled with picks or prospects, which is exactly what the Canes wont be giving up if they’re rebuilding. A top-6 fwd at the trade deadline is going to be overpriced and a rental, theyre better off getting one this summer. Guys like Gleason are harder to come by than you think, especially on this team that has too many “offensive minded” d-men, none of which can play defense.

www.prosportsblogging.com

by Great Ice-Pectations on Jan 30, 2012 1:28 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

Actually, Pitkanen gets most of his points at even strength. And while his +/- is worse than Gleason’s this year, it was better last season in 08-09 and 10-11. Overall, Pitkanen is a -12 as a Hurricane and Gleason a -7. So does that mean Gleason is an even strength liability, too?

And sorry, but the fact that Gleason has a whopping 14 points 2/3rds through the season and yet is on pace for career high (sorry, CAREER HIGH) kind of proves Capt. Stinky’s point about no offensive upside.

by Kahz on Jan 30, 2012 1:38 PM EST up reply actions  

I stand corrected on Pitkanen’s points, but his +/- is still rotten. It basically cancels out any offensive upside he provides. Not all defensemen are going to have offensive upside. That’s just how it is. I just dont think you can point to every player on this team, let alone one that is actually a positive player (not referring to +/-) and say “they didnt help us make the playoffs the last two years”, because that would be the entire team. Gleason is a good player to keep around.

www.prosportsblogging.com

by Great Ice-Pectations on Jan 30, 2012 1:41 PM EST up reply actions  

So when Gleason was a -11 and Pitkanen -2 last season, what did that mean? That Gleason was a liability? And he’s not now, and Pitkanen is? Please tell me more.

by Kahz on Jan 30, 2012 1:45 PM EST up reply actions  

Gleason was a liability then, yes. And again, on a shit team. My point was everyone is acting like Gleason is the reason this team has terrible defense. He isn’t.

www.prosportsblogging.com

by Great Ice-Pectations on Jan 30, 2012 1:47 PM EST up reply actions  

“On a shit team”. Team missed the playoffs by one point…that’s not “shit”. Their goal differential in terms of goals that count towards +/- was -7, which means they were +4 when Gleason was off the ice. I’d say that Gleason being a liability was a huge reason they missed the playoffs.

by Kahz on Jan 30, 2012 1:49 PM EST up reply actions  

A team that barely misses a playoffs is a team that gets slaughtered in the playoffs and by my own standards it’s not a matter a barely missing, you miss and you miss. That’s it. But I’m sure I could go back and pick one a game or a stat for every player that makes them seem like the goat, when all they really are is a fan whipping boy.

www.prosportsblogging.com

by Great Ice-Pectations on Jan 30, 2012 1:53 PM EST up reply actions  

lol, geez

usually when i’m called out multiple times ON MY OPINION I know when to quit….

an opinion is just that — an opinion. in my opinion, gleason will being nothing new to a team that has consistently underwhelmed in previous seasons and should have been traded.

agree, disagree, whatevs…

"I need to make sure I don't get too frustrated and stay focused on my game...The points and the offense, you have to believe, are going to come." - Eric Staal, 11/6/2011

by Capt. Stinky on Jan 30, 2012 2:25 PM EST up reply actions  

No hate, I agree to disagree. I respect your opinion.

www.prosportsblogging.com

by Great Ice-Pectations on Jan 30, 2012 2:27 PM EST up reply actions  

In previous seasons

We didn’t have Capt. Kirk at the helm….Give the regime a chance….I like what we are doing now!

In Kirk we Trust

by Mullett on Jan 30, 2012 2:27 PM EST up reply actions  

You don't think Rutherford was testing the market on what he'd return?

The same reasons people are bitching about his re-signing are obvious to other GMs.

Personal attacks are the weapon of the ignorant.

Panthers '011: This is what we've been waiting for...we get to overpay the core of a 2-14 team!

by MichaelProcton on Jan 30, 2012 2:45 PM EST up reply actions  

Kinda shocked that he was resigned but I’m not going to complain whatsoever. Like DSB said above, I’m a little worried that he’s taken a step back from two years ago but he does look better this year than last. He actually hasn’t looked bad at all lately but that’s just me. Plus, he’s a heart and soul guy that the Canes need moving forward.

I agree with Great Ice’s quick take as well.

"I'm not going to waste my time with Tuukka Rask" - Cam Ward

by anonymousJ on Jan 30, 2012 1:15 PM EST reply actions  

I'm thrilled

We need to keep some grit on the blue line. While he has no wheels, I think he plays his position well, with a little sand paper if you know what I mean. We have enough puck moving D-men. I hope we re-sign Allen next.
We are not that far off, the biggest obstacle to success was Mo, and he’s long gone.

by JohnnymcQ on Jan 30, 2012 1:30 PM EST up reply actions  

I like this signing but I really hope we do move Allen now. Keeping Gleason probably upped the price for Allen. Plus we have a crowded blue line moving forward now.

"I'm not going to waste my time with Tuukka Rask" - Cam Ward

by anonymousJ on Jan 30, 2012 1:35 PM EST up reply actions  

Pitkanen, Gleason, Faulk, Harrison, McBain all staying the next few years. Murphy and Dumoulin will both battle for the extra spot.

Effectively our D next year will be the same with a rookie. Which means its not getting any better and we aren’t contending.

Unless McBain is moved in a significant deal I don’t see how this benefits the team. Overpaying fan favorites is a Canes tradition though.

by JussiJuice on Jan 30, 2012 1:43 PM EST via mobile up reply actions  

Faulk is betting better, which means the D is getting better

but yeah, I’d tend towards moving McBain too

If I cared more about my UNC side, I'd call myself "Tar Volon," and that'd be awesome.
Bolts, Canes, Preds (now in different conferences!). Canes mini-STH. Southern hockey solidarity
Rocky Top Talk

by Incipient_Senescence on Jan 30, 2012 1:47 PM EST up reply actions  

McBain is still only 23!

I keep hearing the ‘experts’ say that it takes longer for a defenseman to develop than for a offensive player.

So I don’t get the quick judgement that McBain must go that I hear from so many posters. Yeah, I see his mistakes, I also see that he can handle the puck and has potential. The hurricanes are going nowhere this year, so potential is a very important thing to have.

by CanesFanFromLI on Jan 30, 2012 2:27 PM EST up reply actions  

I'm not saying there's no hope for him

but if others want him, he’s not one of the core future guys that we have to hold onto (see: Faulk, Skinner)

(also, I do confess to sometimes forgetting how young he is)

If I cared more about my UNC side, I'd call myself "Tar Volon," and that'd be awesome.
Bolts, Canes, Preds (now in different conferences!). Canes mini-STH. Southern hockey solidarity
Rocky Top Talk

by Incipient_Senescence on Jan 30, 2012 2:39 PM EST up reply actions  

Even at his best...

His game isn’t very well-rounded. He’s a limited player who isn’t really showing growth in his weaker areas.

Personal attacks are the weapon of the ignorant.

Panthers '011: This is what we've been waiting for...we get to overpay the core of a 2-14 team!

by MichaelProcton on Jan 30, 2012 2:50 PM EST up reply actions  

Chara was a -27 at the age of 23!

Everyone would love to have a defensemen like Chara on their team.

But at the age of 23, he was a -27, some people thought he was to big and awkward to be a good defensement in the NHL, but he got better.

McBain’s not going to grow another 8 inches, but he could get better also.

by CanesFanFromLI on Jan 30, 2012 3:31 PM EST up reply actions  

This comparison is pretty disingenuous.

Personal attacks are the weapon of the ignorant.

Panthers '011: This is what we've been waiting for...we get to overpay the core of a 2-14 team!

by MichaelProcton on Jan 31, 2012 12:37 PM EST up reply actions  

Exactly, he has potential, but he isn’t living up to it. You can’t horde every player who has potential forever, or else we would have a team full of Boychuks and McBains that would be in the basement every year. Now is the time to move McBain.

His ceiling, IF, and that’s a big if, he lives up to his potential is a 2nd/3rd pairing guy. Right now we have Gleason, Pitkanen, and Faulk with definite top 4 status. Harrison can also be thrown in there with his play. I expect Murphy to replace Pitkanen, so I won’t even include him. Where is McBain going to play?

by hurricane9 on Jan 30, 2012 4:52 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

There are no guarantees that either Murphy or Dumoulin will be ready for the NHL next year. I give the upside to Murphy because he probably has NHL level offense but Dumoulin is a wild card.

by jfhammon on Jan 30, 2012 1:49 PM EST up reply actions  

Dumoulin has NHL size…

by Squeaky83 on Jan 30, 2012 2:12 PM EST up reply actions  

So does Brett Bellemore in Charlotte.

by jfhammon on Jan 30, 2012 7:21 PM EST up reply actions  

Do tell...

What superior UFA defenseman has gotten paid less on the market?

Personal attacks are the weapon of the ignorant.

Panthers '011: This is what we've been waiting for...we get to overpay the core of a 2-14 team!

by MichaelProcton on Jan 30, 2012 2:50 PM EST up reply actions  

You are right, we need more sandpaper and a shutdown force on the back end. Unfortunately, Gleason has not provided this for 2 years. Allen has done 10x the job Gleason has in this regard.

The $4 million paid to Gleason will ensure we never get the true top line shutdown D we actually need. He is worth maybe 2.75. Kaberle 2.0, I can’t believe JR did it again.

by JussiJuice on Jan 30, 2012 1:38 PM EST via mobile up reply actions  

this is a good point. i am leaning towards nicknaming Gleason “Kabs 2.0” as a result

"I need to make sure I don't get too frustrated and stay focused on my game...The points and the offense, you have to believe, are going to come." - Eric Staal, 11/6/2011

by Capt. Stinky on Jan 30, 2012 2:26 PM EST up reply actions  

The only real difference between this deal and Kabs is that Kabs actually had a decent past 2 years..

by JussiJuice on Jan 30, 2012 2:51 PM EST via mobile up reply actions  

Ya, because Kaberle’s puck-moving game and age are exactly like Gleason’s game.

by Gillimus on Jan 30, 2012 6:33 PM EST up reply actions  

Is there any way to selectively block posters from appearing in comments?

by jfhammon on Jan 30, 2012 7:22 PM EST up reply actions  

RaccoonFink has created an ignore feature for SBNation that allows you to block specific posters from appearing in your comment timeline:

http://me.raccoonfink.com/sbnation-black-list-browser-extension/

I’m not advocating this approach, just passing along the info ;)

by Jamie Kellner on Jan 30, 2012 7:33 PM EST up reply actions  

Well there are at least 2 people I’m going to add to this… Thanks

by jfhammon on Jan 30, 2012 8:52 PM EST up reply actions  

why participate in a forum then, if you don’t want to hear other opinions? just sayin…

"I need to make sure I don't get too frustrated and stay focused on my game...The points and the offense, you have to believe, are going to come." - Eric Staal, 11/6/2011

by Capt. Stinky on Jan 31, 2012 7:53 AM EST up reply actions   1 recs

This.

Personal attacks are the weapon of the ignorant.

Panthers '011: This is what we've been waiting for...we get to overpay the core of a 2-14 team!

by MichaelProcton on Jan 31, 2012 12:38 PM EST up reply actions  

Not exactly.

The team’s record under Muller prorated to the full season would only give us 49 points, six out of the playoffs.

Personal attacks are the weapon of the ignorant.

Panthers '011: This is what we've been waiting for...we get to overpay the core of a 2-14 team!

by MichaelProcton on Jan 30, 2012 2:49 PM EST up reply actions  

Meaningless

As it takes time coming in mid season to institute change. You cannot look at his record since the takeover as he inherited a different style of play than what he has instituted, and even more importantly, a different standard of expectation and reward….

by Squeaky83 on Jan 30, 2012 3:15 PM EST up reply actions  

Skinner/Pitkanen

Had these two been in the lineup with Muller the whole time we would be looking real close at leading the division…Hypothetical yes ,but with your best Dman and forward makes a big difference in 1-2 goal games.

by hellfish on Jan 30, 2012 3:22 PM EST up reply actions  

Every coach has injuries to deal with.

Doesn’t make them a better coach if their team happens to get hurt.

Personal attacks are the weapon of the ignorant.

Panthers '011: This is what we've been waiting for...we get to overpay the core of a 2-14 team!

by MichaelProcton on Jan 31, 2012 12:38 PM EST up reply actions  

There is no doubt the team has played better the last 15 games….How much influence do you think the new coaching staff had in this decision?

In Kirk we Trust

by Mullett on Jan 30, 2012 4:22 PM EST up reply actions  

Plenty.

I’m sure they wouldn’t have extended him if they didn’t like his skillset and play.

Personal attacks are the weapon of the ignorant.

Panthers '011: This is what we've been waiting for...we get to overpay the core of a 2-14 team!

by MichaelProcton on Jan 31, 2012 12:39 PM EST up reply actions  

Given the price D-men go for on the open market I am ok with this.

I think this is also a bit of a lower risk bet by JR. He felt that Gleason was worth this over the next four years, and would provide more to the team than the return for a rental player.

by iamafirehazard on Jan 30, 2012 1:35 PM EST reply actions  

Makes sense

The critics of this deal need to be honest: Gleason was not going to fetch us a great return. A #3-#4 defenseman as a rental is going to bring back maybe a second round pick, that’s about it. Better to have that #3 defenseman in place than to gamble. I’m all for a rebuild, but not a multi-year rebuild. Staal and Ward aren’t getting any younger.

by prplmnkydw on Jan 30, 2012 1:36 PM EST reply actions   1 recs

On what quality team is Tm Gleason a #3 defenseman?

by Kahz on Jan 30, 2012 1:39 PM EST up reply actions  

Gleason is only a #3 defenseman on a team where Harrison is a #4 defenseman and Derek Joslin is allowed on the ice.

by Kahz on Jan 30, 2012 1:40 PM EST up reply actions  

Kahz

Not sure I agree on that one. Were that the case, he would not have been in the deadline trade rumour talks of every hockey pundit. So either all of them plus the GMs who’ve made inroads to JR are all off on their assessment of Gleason, or you might be….

…I’m siding towards the numbers.

by Squeaky83 on Jan 30, 2012 1:42 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

Every hockey pundit also called him a solid #4-#6 D. Gleason is not a top-4 D on any serious Cup contender.

by JussiJuice on Jan 30, 2012 1:44 PM EST via mobile up reply actions  

There have been times I’d agree. But based on his current play he is as good as many 2 pairing guys. Take a good look at a lot of these top contenders. They all seem to have an abundance of talented forwards. There is simply a lack of quality D depth across many teams in the NHL.

by sittler27 on Jan 30, 2012 1:47 PM EST up reply actions  

But with the Canes budget, he is being paid as our #1 pairing guy.

Do you agree this deal makes it 100% unlikely that we acquire the true #1 guy the Canes need? The acceptance of mediocrity kills me.

by JussiJuice on Jan 30, 2012 1:52 PM EST via mobile up reply actions  

Actually you are getting to my point. I think that this may well indicate we CAN get to that number guy. My logic is as follows: Faulk, Murphy, are not going to cost us much for a couple of years. Allen and Spacek are gone. McBain maybe trade bait. Harrison is affordable. Joni and Gleason now in house with affordable long term deals. ( In this day and age $4mil is a good deal for a solid 2nd pairing guy). In my opinion JR now has the flexibility to guy after a top pairing guy. And we have insurance with Joslin, Dumoulin and Sangs in the wings.

by sittler27 on Jan 30, 2012 2:17 PM EST up reply actions  

Yep

Puck Daddy’s take :

He’s a bruising, shutdown defenseman in a league that doesn’t have enough of them. If you’re a Hurricanes fan stressing on the $4 million cap hit, up from $2.75 million, don’t fret; this is around his open-market value, depending on the number of suitors

So we have our building blocks on defense.

by Squeaky83 on Jan 30, 2012 2:20 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

Well…. a step in the right direction anyway. To your point we are still missing that true 1st pairing shutdown guy.

by sittler27 on Jan 30, 2012 2:24 PM EST up reply actions  

I just can’t get too excited about paying $4 million to a guy that has been vastly outplayed this year by a guy who was barely a 7th D last year and a 19 year old (granted, a future #1 D)

by JussiJuice on Jan 30, 2012 3:09 PM EST via mobile up reply actions  

being outplayed by Justin Faulk just means that you've played

/mancrush

If I cared more about my UNC side, I'd call myself "Tar Volon," and that'd be awesome.
Bolts, Canes, Preds (now in different conferences!). Canes mini-STH. Southern hockey solidarity
Rocky Top Talk

by Incipient_Senescence on Jan 30, 2012 3:11 PM EST up reply actions  

so our core defense is

Faulk/Harrison
Gleason/Pitkanen
Player X/Player Y (could be McBain/Joslin)

eh….

"I need to make sure I don't get too frustrated and stay focused on my game...The points and the offense, you have to believe, are going to come." - Eric Staal, 11/6/2011

by Capt. Stinky on Jan 30, 2012 2:29 PM EST up reply actions  

Rest of this year… probably. Next year add Murphy into the mix and I suspect a major free agent signing or trade for a top pairing shut down type. No way you can win consistently with the lineup above.

by sittler27 on Jan 30, 2012 2:47 PM EST up reply actions  

plus sittler27 will eventually have a heart attack watching the joslin/mcbain pairing over time

"I need to make sure I don't get too frustrated and stay focused on my game...The points and the offense, you have to believe, are going to come." - Eric Staal, 11/6/2011

by Capt. Stinky on Jan 30, 2012 3:25 PM EST up reply actions  

IF we add a major free agent or trade #1 shutdown D that this team absolutely needs to be a playoff contender, this move is great.

I just see the chances of the Canes paying what it takes, on top of Gleason’s and Pitkanen’s $4+ million long-term, extremely unlikely. 3 years down the line when Faulk and Murphy are in line for serious raises, Gleason’s $4 mil is an issue. Forget the $5-6+ million we are hypothetically paying a true #1 guy.

I was really hoping JR would put this money into that #1 shutdown D and banking on Murphy/Dumoulin performing for cheap.

by JussiJuice on Jan 30, 2012 3:33 PM EST via mobile up reply actions  

See that’s the thing…we can’t keep depending on players to perform because they’re cheap. It hasn’t served us well and isn’t an example people follow.

If it so happens someone plays well an happens to be cheap good, but tw hope of an expected performance given the fact you’re cheap isn’t a good recipe for success

by Caniac Kid on Jan 30, 2012 6:10 PM EST via iPhone app up reply actions   1 recs

From the article on CH.com:

"It’s going to depend on a few things – where are season ticket sales go prior to July 1, whether we get our TV deal done – but we may be in the market for the first time to look at one of the top free agents," he said.

by hurricane9 on Jan 30, 2012 4:54 PM EST up reply actions  

Yeah JR alot will depend on the roster "if’ you plan on selling those STH ,as most fans in Raleigh now know a playoff roster from one like this year’s team.

by hellfish on Jan 30, 2012 6:22 PM EST up reply actions  

Chicken or Egg?
where are season ticket sales go prior to July 1

I really love this ownership. Prove you care and MAYBE we will spend some money.

How bout you spend some money and prove you actually care about winning?

I believe in strength. I believe in unity. And if that strength, that unity of purpose, demands a uniformity of thought, word and deed then so be it.

by Douchebag St John on Jan 30, 2012 7:09 PM EST up reply actions  

And what if we have to trade those new frontline acquisitions because we nobody does care and we can't afford them?

Personal attacks are the weapon of the ignorant.

Panthers '011: This is what we've been waiting for...we get to overpay the core of a 2-14 team!

by MichaelProcton on Jan 31, 2012 12:41 PM EST up reply actions  

Disagree on Gleason being paid top pairing money. Look at the list of defenseman playing in the top pairing for teams, that aren’t on their ELC’s…majority are getting paid significantly more than 4 million.

by Caniac Kid on Jan 30, 2012 2:22 PM EST via iPhone app up reply actions   1 recs

Yeah, most top pairing guys are 5 mil plus…..

by Squeaky83 on Jan 30, 2012 2:23 PM EST up reply actions  

Plus he's wearing the "A"

He’s a stand-up guy that will mix it up when needed and protect other players….There is something to be said for that.

In Kirk we Trust

by Mullett on Jan 30, 2012 2:24 PM EST up reply actions  

speaking as someone following the Lightning for the last several years

the top pairing is getting $3.8 (Brewer) and $4.0 (Hedman) yearly. But there’s also $3.85 a year invested in Pavel Kubina and $3.6 in Matthias Ohlund, neither of whom are anything approaching top pairing. So yeah, this kind of money for 2nd pairing guys is not unusual

If I cared more about my UNC side, I'd call myself "Tar Volon," and that'd be awesome.
Bolts, Canes, Preds (now in different conferences!). Canes mini-STH. Southern hockey solidarity
Rocky Top Talk

by Incipient_Senescence on Jan 30, 2012 2:42 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

Yea and good luck resigning Hedman or Brewer for anything under $5mil.

by sittler27 on Jan 30, 2012 2:45 PM EST up reply actions  

actually. . . we resigned Brewer this offseason for $3.8 per year (four years)

Hedman was extended back in November for $4M per year (five years)

If I cared more about my UNC side, I'd call myself "Tar Volon," and that'd be awesome.
Bolts, Canes, Preds (now in different conferences!). Canes mini-STH. Southern hockey solidarity
Rocky Top Talk

by Incipient_Senescence on Jan 30, 2012 2:50 PM EST up reply actions  

Those are the CAP hit numbers. Brewer actual salary is 4.5 this year, 3.750 next, then 4.0 for two years and 3.750. Good signing by Tampa in my opinion.
Hedman is confusing and I mistook his $5.750mil in two years for what he was going to make very year under his new deal. His is a weird contract: 3mil plus 1.5mil bonus in year 1; then 3mil; then 5.75mil, then back down to 3mil for an average CAP hit of 4mil. I wonder whether they they did this due to timing of St. Louis, Stamkos and Lecevalier deals. But your point is very valid and I missed it…. you have these guys locked up.

by sittler27 on Jan 30, 2012 5:31 PM EST up reply actions  

I'm pretty sure the ridiculous Kubina deal plays into the beginning (and perhaps the Ohlund too)

but I can’t say if the MSL/Stamkos/Vinny deals are playing a role

If I cared more about my UNC side, I'd call myself "Tar Volon," and that'd be awesome.
Bolts, Canes, Preds (now in different conferences!). Canes mini-STH. Southern hockey solidarity
Rocky Top Talk

by Incipient_Senescence on Jan 30, 2012 5:49 PM EST up reply actions  

And the difference between a #3 and a #4 D is?

by hurricane9 on Jan 30, 2012 4:53 PM EST up reply actions  

I would say comfort with moving him up on the first line if you need to due to injury, etc.

Personal attacks are the weapon of the ignorant.

Panthers '011: This is what we've been waiting for...we get to overpay the core of a 2-14 team!

by MichaelProcton on Jan 31, 2012 12:42 PM EST up reply actions  

That’s basically the only difference. Both play at the same time.

And based on that criteria, I would consider Gleason a #3 defenseman. I am comfortable letting have first pairing duties if necessary for a short time.

by hurricane9 on Jan 31, 2012 2:48 PM EST up reply actions  

Harrison has 7 Goals in 41 Games...

The Canes have a history of developing under-appreciated D-man into established NHL players (Seidenberg, Corvo, Commodore)… and then allowing them to slip away for basically nothing…

Harrison’s come out of nowhere, but if the Canes really wanted to do something smart, they would’ve extended his contract by 4 years, while his perceived $ value is still low. Harrison for 4 years at $1.5 would have been a great move. In my opinion, he’s our only D-man with offensive talents. We can argue that Joni is a great puck moving D-man, but he rarely scores, nor directly sets up many goals.

by HockeyWILM on Jan 30, 2012 1:54 PM EST up reply actions  

Pitkanen doesn’t directly set up many goals…I wonder where all those assists come from. What a joke

by Kahz on Jan 30, 2012 6:32 PM EST up reply actions  

Yeah

Plus he was starting to shoot more, and he has a good shot he doesn’t use enough. I thought he was going to score more goals this year prior to injury.

by Squeaky83 on Jan 31, 2012 7:35 AM EST up reply actions  

This is an odd one...

Looking at this initially, I thought it was a sign and trade scenario, where Gleason wanted a long-term contract in place before agreeing to a trade deal. I can’t recall a time in the past where the Canes have extended a contract mid-season. Let’s face it; it’s been a couple since Tim has played to his potential. That said, Rutherford’s comments are either somewhat dishonest, or they truly plan to keep Gleason for 4 years.

When Gleason’s on top of his game, he can be very good. Problem is, if you look back at his time with the Canes, he’s been at level at best 30-40% of the time. At the end of last year I expected (hoped) we’d learn he’d been hiding an injury all season. Apparently that was not the case. This year, he hasn’t been terrible, but he hasn’t been very good. The guy we saw in the Olympics was worth $4M per year. The player we’ve seen the past 2 seasons more like $1.5M. Question: this season, If you had to choose between Gleason and Harrison, who would you take?

The timing of the deal, and the dollars involved just makes this a weird one. What’s the rush?

by HockeyWILM on Jan 30, 2012 1:39 PM EST reply actions  

Gleason also has an NTC for the first two years of the deal.

There wouldn’t be a need to include that if he expected to be traded.

Personal attacks are the weapon of the ignorant.

Panthers '011: This is what we've been waiting for...we get to overpay the core of a 2-14 team!

by MichaelProcton on Jan 30, 2012 2:58 PM EST up reply actions  

Interesting...

But I think he belongs there more than any of the guys on the fourth if we’re trying to figure out what we have for the future.

Personal attacks are the weapon of the ignorant.

Panthers '011: This is what we've been waiting for...we get to overpay the core of a 2-14 team!

by MichaelProcton on Jan 30, 2012 2:58 PM EST up reply actions  

Based on some of these comments we’d have to assume that JR was either completely out of touch or an idiot. I think it is neither. Who if not him has by now seen the actual interest in Gleason and the value offered. I’m sure he’s much better informed than all the so called analysts who are speculating on who is offering what.
Secondly…. at $4mil average a year in the current market this is what the average 2nd pairing guy is getting. I have not always been pleased with Tim’s play but I think we can all agree he is at worst a 2nd pairing guy on most teams. And overall this has been a better year for Timmay and he has played better under Mullers system where the forwards are more responsible or they sit.

Overall this is not a bad move for the Canes. They can still sell off Spacek and Allen ( and maybe even McBain) and I still suspect that one of JR’s priority’s is to get a top pairing shutdown guy to go along with all the offensive minded young D we have both here and as prospects. Tim will be a critical stabilizing force for one of those.

by sittler27 on Jan 30, 2012 1:44 PM EST reply actions  

I originally thought that this would bring stability as you said but Darren D TSN is adding Pikanen’s name to the remaining Canes D men who could be traded. He even goes further by saying the injury will not prevent a trade. What the heck is going on? Confusing if true..

Hold out baits to entice the enemy. Feign disorder, and crush him.
Sun Tzu circa 4th Century BC

by hurricanefever on Jan 30, 2012 1:50 PM EST up reply actions  

So far I have not seen one deal that the TSN insiders are currently predicting come to pass. You and I can pull names out of our butts too. I think it will be hard to move a guy by the trading deadline that may just be coming back from a knee and extended concussion situation. Teams making deadline deals are looking to add insurance, not more risk.

by sittler27 on Jan 30, 2012 2:21 PM EST up reply actions  

Lol I was about to mention Garrioch & company have whiffed on every trade rumor so far ,I think it was Lyle Richardson about a month ago saying ,“if JR doesn’t get close to what he wants for Gleason he can likely sign him to an extension that’s affordable for what Gleason brings to the team”…Bingo!

.Ruutu on the other hand looks like he’s gone for a rental ,as we have lots of extra body’s at forward with Nash being called up ,and LaRose ready to play. I hope JR can bring Ruutu back ,as Ruutu said at the last BYB interview ’I like being here ,I like the team we have ,and want to stay since i git married"

by hellfish on Jan 30, 2012 2:40 PM EST up reply actions  

It would be nice to see Ruu as a true rental. We get value. He helps his new team and gets a cup run. He re-signs with the Canes in the summer.

by sittler27 on Jan 30, 2012 2:44 PM EST up reply actions  

However...

We will probably lose out on some compensation if that happens.

Personal attacks are the weapon of the ignorant.

Panthers '011: This is what we've been waiting for...we get to overpay the core of a 2-14 team!

by MichaelProcton on Jan 30, 2012 3:00 PM EST up reply actions  

Maybe. But for some teams like Chicago who have to deal with CAP issues next year a rental is exactly what they want. Its not always perceived as a negative thing.

by sittler27 on Jan 30, 2012 3:24 PM EST up reply actions  

Not to mention we could take someone back to help the other team dump salary this season to stay under the cap (and keep us over the floor). Another GM would appreciate that flexibility.

by Chuck Burns on Jan 30, 2012 4:10 PM EST via mobile up reply actions  

Agree with a smile on my face…….I have not seen a Canes trade deadline year any more unsettled than this one. It will be nice when those guys talk about our great season rather than who is traded or who is not………. Life gets easier when that happens…

Hold out baits to entice the enemy. Feign disorder, and crush him.
Sun Tzu circa 4th Century BC

by hurricanefever on Jan 30, 2012 2:48 PM EST up reply actions  

Re-Signing Gleason

I like the move on a number of different levels. Gleason and the entire defense has had a very strong January. Other than being blown out by Nashville, the Hurricanes were in every other game. Gleason does provide a mean streak that the Hurricanes need. I also think Gleason is still slowed down a slight bit by being banged up. My guess is it’s his back; but nonetheless as far as defenseman goes he is hitting his prime.

I also like the move because it signals to all the players that if they truly are committed to the Hurricanes and play hard they can become part of a stable team with a stable core. For players such as Skinner and Faulk that is a great message. I also like the fact Rutherford is finding out whether players do or don’t want to be a part of the Hurricanes in time that he can trade the players if need be.

I would be very pleased if Ruutu is signed to an extension; but unless it happens today or tomorrow, I don’t think it is happening. Finally, I like the message that Rutherford is sending to other GMs that if they are interested in a Canes player, they need to make their move now.

by abramsdoug on Jan 30, 2012 1:51 PM EST up reply actions  

AD, I share much of your thoughts on this re-signing. In point of fact, Timmy has played much better the last dozen games or so. My guess is that the market return wasn’t as high as JR wanted and once the replacement scenario was considered, this move made sense. It also means that, perhaps, Allen and Spacek are sparking more interest than originally thought.

Unfortunately, I feel this also means that Mr. Jamie McBain may be or will be “in play” on one of the hockey deals JR is trying to swing. As much as I personally would hate that (I feel that McBain is the most under-appreciated D-man we have as well as being berated for his questionable play and unrecognized for his more frequent stellar play). That may be a great thing for the Canes given that Faulk, whom I thought was much less NHL ready when brought up, has happily proven me wrong. Additionally, with Sanguinetti’s recent play, the emergence of Biega, Alt, and Levi this year, and even Jordan’s steady improvement, the Canes probably feel there’s lots of flexibility on the blueline. My guess is that we get a “stay at home” type with one of our 2nd rounders this year.

Just thinking out loud here, but if Ruutu yields a 1st rounder and a prospect, Allen perhaps a 2nd rounder, and Spacek conceivably a 3rd rounder, I could easily see McBain plus a couple of 2nd’s bringing back a Top 6 forward +. I would even go a step farther and assume that Boychuk is probably in play (although his value has gone down a bit). So all of that being said, there are a lot of moves yet to be made and JR probably needed to solidify a few things in advance.

by NotOpie on Jan 30, 2012 2:07 PM EST up reply actions  

I don’t think we get a Top 6 forward at the trade deadline for McBain and a couple of 2nds. Teams in contention are not going to trade a top 6 forward. I could be wrong but I don’t see it. Ruutu may bring back a young prospect or a 1st rounder depending on the team.

In Kirk we Trust

by Mullett on Jan 30, 2012 2:22 PM EST up reply actions  

My point was more that we’d have many assets to work with, McBain and a couple of 2nds, not to mention a couple of 1sts plus some talent on the farm….I believe there’s a mix and match there to get some good value in return…Top 6 forward, maybe Top 4 D…who knows.

by NotOpie on Jan 30, 2012 10:00 PM EST up reply actions  

Agreed on Ruutu.

This deal was very likely a “Last chance to sign before I trade you as a rental” type. If he offered it to Gleason, you have to think he offered it to Ruutu too.

I expect Ruutu is either re-signed today/tomorrow or traded very soon.

by JussiJuice on Jan 30, 2012 4:05 PM EST via mobile up reply actions  

This is what I’ve thought for awhile now ,especially after hearing Ruutu on the fan at the BYB interview it seems he’’ll be back this year or next.

by hellfish on Jan 30, 2012 4:13 PM EST up reply actions  

"JR was either completely out of touch or an idiot"

how do you explain re-signing LaRose AND Dwyer; keeping Mo; and signing Kabs?

but i kid…

"I need to make sure I don't get too frustrated and stay focused on my game...The points and the offense, you have to believe, are going to come." - Eric Staal, 11/6/2011

by Capt. Stinky on Jan 30, 2012 2:31 PM EST up reply actions  

so i guess there are 2 JR’s; “Good JR” and “Evil JR” — Good JR fired Mo, brought in Muller and jettisoned Kabs. Hopefully he is the one pulling the trigger on this deal now…

"I need to make sure I don't get too frustrated and stay focused on my game...The points and the offense, you have to believe, are going to come." - Eric Staal, 11/6/2011

by Capt. Stinky on Jan 30, 2012 2:32 PM EST up reply actions  

We owed Mo another year on his contract so he was coming back….Dwyer is a good value for what we pay him as a checking forward and penalty killer….Kabs and LaRose I tend to agree with you although LaRose’s goals this year would suggest he is getting paid a salary comparable to his production by NHL standards.

In Kirk we Trust

by Mullett on Jan 30, 2012 2:38 PM EST up reply actions  

It has been a mixed year for him. In my opinion some really head scratchingly bad moves and then some good ones. It isn’t a zero sum game…. let’s hope the tide has turned and he starts working a positive plan. One thing that is encouraging is that Muller has a definite style he wants to play. There are only certain types of forwards and D-men that can play it. That should give JR a blue print on what he has to do to engineer the team that his coach needs.

by sittler27 on Jan 30, 2012 2:42 PM EST up reply actions  

The fact that JR broke from his policy and negotiated a contract during the season gives me hope that he’s open to some different ideas to move the organization up the food chain.

by Hockeydog on Jan 30, 2012 4:10 PM EST up reply actions  

  • LaRose is on an entirely reasonable deal, is a great locker-room presence, and is a fan favorite.
  • Dwyer, similarly, is a reasonably-paid, limited player.
  • Maurice consistently outperformed the budget constraints he was given here.
  • Well, hmm…shit.

Personal attacks are the weapon of the ignorant.

Panthers '011: This is what we've been waiting for...we get to overpay the core of a 2-14 team!

by MichaelProcton on Jan 30, 2012 3:02 PM EST up reply actions  

What happened in 09-10?

I guess you forgot that year we spent to the Cap and got the 7th draft pick?….I’m not a Mo basher but a change was needed. I’m a season ticket holder and I honestly had contemplated giving up on this team….especially since we drive 90 miles each way to watch hockey…..Muller has definitely given me new life and I bet I’m not alone.

In Kirk we Trust

by Mullett on Jan 30, 2012 4:30 PM EST up reply actions  

Still under .500.

If that’s the kind of “new life” you’re looking for, you seem easily swayed.

Personal attacks are the weapon of the ignorant.

Panthers '011: This is what we've been waiting for...we get to overpay the core of a 2-14 team!

by MichaelProcton on Jan 31, 2012 12:45 PM EST up reply actions  

LaRose

LaRose is on an entirely reasonable deal, is a great locker-room presence, and is a fan favorite…………..(you forgot)…………and is taking up the space of Jerome Samson, Bowman, Boychuck, or Dalpe who COULD have a much higher ceiling and need the experience.

In Kirk we Trust

by Mullett on Jan 30, 2012 4:34 PM EST up reply actions  

+59

"I need to make sure I don't get too frustrated and stay focused on my game...The points and the offense, you have to believe, are going to come." - Eric Staal, 11/6/2011

by Capt. Stinky on Jan 31, 2012 7:55 AM EST up reply actions  

And if any of those players had come close to producing like LaRose does at the NHL leve...

you might have a point. But “potential” doesn’t help win hockey games.

Personal attacks are the weapon of the ignorant.

Panthers '011: This is what we've been waiting for...we get to overpay the core of a 2-14 team!

by MichaelProcton on Jan 31, 2012 12:44 PM EST up reply actions  

Mo

Underperformed even with the Leaf’s budget ,and returning here was preceded by a stinch in the air ,and most of the fans knew what was coming along with Mo = .500 or worse.

by hellfish on Jan 30, 2012 4:17 PM EST reply actions  

Worse, like making the conference finals!

One certainly hopes Muller gets us there eventually. Maurice did three times.

Personal attacks are the weapon of the ignorant.

Panthers '011: This is what we've been waiting for...we get to overpay the core of a 2-14 team!

by MichaelProcton on Jan 31, 2012 12:45 PM EST up reply actions  

so "three" means two these days?

If I cared more about my UNC side, I'd call myself "Tar Volon," and that'd be awesome.
Bolts, Canes, Preds (now in different conferences!). Canes mini-STH. Southern hockey solidarity
Rocky Top Talk

by Incipient_Senescence on Jan 31, 2012 1:21 PM EST up reply actions  

Well, personally, I am happy. I said in one of the game day threads that I expected Gleason to stay, and it’s happened.

Unlike all of the armchair GMs here, JR is actually talking to the other GMs in the league. He knows what he can get for Gleason, and he knows what Gleason wants. If he decides that extending Gleason is the better option, but I am going to assume that he knows best (although some of his decisions lately have been odd).

$4 million is fair price for a 2nd pairing defenseman. And that’s cap hit anyway. He’s getting $3.75 next season.

Right now I think the best decision is to trade Ruutu (his comments make it seem like he wants to play here, so he will likely resign), McBain, and Allen.

And lastly, this signing shows that Gleason really likes playing here. He takes a contract extension when he can probably get traded to a playoff contender or when he can hold out and resign a larger contract with a better team over the off-season. On top of this, he gets a NTC.

by hurricane9 on Jan 30, 2012 5:02 PM EST reply actions   1 recs

I just hope he starts playing like he cares again (where is Olympics Gleason?) and this isn’t just a kush gig for him. Absolutely no excuse to be outplayed by a 19 year old and Harrison on a nightly basis.

Im tired of hearing about how he must be “injured” all the time only to come out and berate his own play and say he is 100%. Canes can’t afford underachievers at $4 a year.

by JussiJuice on Jan 30, 2012 5:25 PM EST via mobile up reply actions  

In the most recent intermission interview that he was in (earlier in January, but I can’t remember when), he had a cast around his wrist and up his arm. I don’t think he is actually 100%.

But still, I agree, he needs to be the Olympics Gleason every night. If he is that player, then he is great.

by hurricane9 on Jan 30, 2012 6:07 PM EST up reply actions  

"Playing like he cares?"

Oh, so that’s the problem. He just doesn’t care.

Personal attacks are the weapon of the ignorant.

Panthers '011: This is what we've been waiting for...we get to overpay the core of a 2-14 team!

by MichaelProcton on Jan 31, 2012 12:46 PM EST up reply actions  

I agree ,and the reason player like playing here is the lack of a hostile media ,and fan base which some players especially the euro players absolutely hate ,and worse if they have a a family ,and can actually go out without being hounded which is the case with alot of former players like A.Ward etc. ,and players like most of us will choose an area with the best schools ,and quality of life over a few bucks more when most of the time there millionaires anyway.

by hellfish on Jan 30, 2012 5:24 PM EST reply actions  

Yup.

See Cole, Erik, and Whitney, Ray.

Personal attacks are the weapon of the ignorant.

Panthers '011: This is what we've been waiting for...we get to overpay the core of a 2-14 team!

by MichaelProcton on Jan 31, 2012 12:47 PM EST up reply actions  

Yup

Was about the years not the amount that they were not resigned ,If you lend JR your crystal ball with built in hindsight I’m sure he would’ve signed Whitney even being 38yrs old then ,and with that circus in Montreal I’m sure Cole would love seeing Raleigh with the ability for him and his family to leave there house without being harassed ,and being 32 last year the 4yrs $4.5m was to long to make sense business wise especially with a NTC built in.

by hellfish on Jan 31, 2012 1:41 PM EST up reply actions  

Not true at all.
In past seasons, Rutherford admitted that budget constraints have cost the team players they would have liked to keep otherwise, Ray Whitney and Erik Cole being specifically mentioned

"When you [lose veterans], the young players have to develop a lot quicker," Rutherford said. "Those two things haven’t matched up, and when that happens, sometimes you take a step back like we did this year."

http://hurricanes.nhl.com/club/news.htm?id=614303&navid=DL|CAR|home

Personal attacks are the weapon of the ignorant.

Panthers '011: This is what we've been waiting for...we get to overpay the core of a 2-14 team!

by MichaelProcton on Jan 31, 2012 8:32 PM EST up reply actions  

The Habs offered Cole another year 4yrs vs 3yrs as for Whitney 2 yrs vs 1yr ,and he went simply didn’t want role in a rebuilding process was another factor ,and if any NHL team has more budget concerns it’s the NHL run Coyote’s.

by hellfish on Jan 31, 2012 8:42 PM EST up reply actions  

Yup, Rutherford was just lyin' his ass off.

OK.

I gotta stop takin' my baths durin' Peter's shenanigans.

by MichaelProcton on Feb 1, 2012 10:14 PM EST up reply actions  

“It is what it is” John Fox ;) Throwing big money at 36+yr old players has bit JR before…Brindamour comes to mind! = Selke to 4th line fast.

by hellfish on Feb 1, 2012 11:29 PM EST up reply actions  

O like the deal and will wait & see what JR

does if anything and hope for the best for #25 as far as Pitts recovery..as and so far not much talk of or about him as of late has there ?/ not that is a bad thing but as humans we sometimes fall into tyhe out of sight out of mind mentality…

9/11/01 - Never Forget !!
Long Live #63 The Condor
Go Canes & Checkers !!!

by CaniacSteve on Jan 30, 2012 6:20 PM EST reply actions  

Moving Pits would be interesting

The team getting him gets cost certainty (signed through 13-14 at $4.5 MM) and a proven 30-40 assist guy who will eat minutes. Would another team be willing to trade an up-and-coming winger that would fit in our top 6?

by Gillimus on Jan 30, 2012 6:40 PM EST reply actions  

Imo not this year with him having a concussion ,and knee surgery…Possible ,but not likely.

by hellfish on Jan 30, 2012 7:25 PM EST up reply actions  

Typical fan-atical reactions.

(Yes, I’m a fan, but all I do is watch the games on TV (used to go occasionally) and sometimes read the comments here, I’m not “fanatical”.)

“Hope springs eternal”. (Or “grass is always greener”.)
We want draft picks, not current “ordinary” players
We want prospects, not current “ordinary” players

Typical fan reaction is “we want draft picks” instead of keeping “bums” (which means, almost everyone), as though that will magically bring us outstanding players, when we all know in our more lucid moments how chancy even a first round pick can be. Another typical fan reaction is “we want prospects” even though we know from our own experience that even the first round prospects often aren’t that good.

“He’s a bum”
If a player isn’t an all-star, he becomes a slug, not worth paying much. It’s all-or-nothing, $6M or bust. Yet no team, certainly not a budget team, is going to have many players worth that much money. And there are a lot of slots to fill, that youngsters/prospects/draft picks aren’t sufficient for. We NEED some $3-4M pretty-good-serviceable guys. They’re the troops who hold things together.

We just secured Gleason. Ruu is another of those guys. But he may have priced himself into the $6M category, unfortunately. He’s NOT one of THOSE guys. But if he can find someone to pay him that way, he’s gone. Teams with a lot of money can afford to take a chance on wasting some of it, as Montreal took a chance with Cole (and we’ll see in a few years how that pans out).

This is a surprising, but good, re-signing.

by LewPuls1 on Jan 30, 2012 7:01 PM EST reply actions   2 recs

Nice post.

Personal attacks are the weapon of the ignorant.

Panthers '011: This is what we've been waiting for...we get to overpay the core of a 2-14 team!

by MichaelProcton on Jan 31, 2012 12:48 PM EST up reply actions  

With Ruutu ,and Jussi producing about the same amount of points ,and Ruutu making $800k more now imo he won’t get a tick over 4yrs at $4.5m which he would be worth as 57pts is his best year ,Jussi’s was 65 ,so most teams other than the Habs will not over pay unless they see something that other’s don’t. I think he signs this year here soon,or next from previous comments he has made recently.

by hellfish on Jan 30, 2012 7:23 PM EST reply actions  

Actually Ruutu makes $1.4 million more than Jussi does this season. Ruutu is probably worth $4 to $4.5 million per season, but given the shallow free agency pool and the love of power forwards; Ruutu will probably be able to get $5 to $5.25 million on the open market.

And my 2 cents on the Gleason signing: I was going JR would trade him as part of a package for either a solid to good top 6 forward or a true top 4 all-around defenseman. But given what looks like “slim pickings” regarding defensive defensemen, this seems like a smart signing. Its probably a little more than what he deserves, but if Gleason regains his olympic form; it will be a really good deal. One thumb up JR, but not two.

JR; please dump some players and bring the kids up to stay!

by PackPride17 on Jan 30, 2012 9:01 PM EST via mobile up reply actions  

Then trade for Jeff Carter if Ruutu gets more than $4.5m Carter is only 5.2 ish and is a year younger ,so if Ruutu gets more than that I’ll eat a puck sandwich…Cap Geek has Jussi at $3m & Ruutu at $3.8m…Carter has scored over 60pts twice ,84 once in 08/09 with 46g since 05/06 if Ruutu gets more than that it must be the Habs.

by hellfish on Jan 30, 2012 9:56 PM EST via mobile up reply actions  

Capgeek is listing the players cap hit. Hit the salary button and you’ll see Ruutu is actually making $4.4 million this season.

JR; please dump some players and bring the kids up to stay!

by PackPride17 on Jan 31, 2012 6:50 AM EST via mobile up reply actions  

Carter is not what this “Team” needs, he is basically a “Me”. It will be interesting who gets Carter but it will not be the Canes…….not a JR kind of guy. He probable winds up with his buddy out west.

Hold out baits to entice the enemy. Feign disorder, and crush him.
Sun Tzu circa 4th Century BC

by hurricanefever on Jan 31, 2012 8:15 AM EST up reply actions  

this was an unexpected

move by jr. certainly caught me unawares. i like it because its not the usual modus operandi and timmy is a solid player despite his numbers. other than suter/weber dont know that there are any other ufa dmen i would choose over gleson. i do think at least two of our d need to be moved for something because there is going to be one hell of a log jam on the blueline next year.

" was it over when the germans bombed pearl harbor?"

by brass bonanza on Jan 30, 2012 8:14 PM EST reply actions  

Budget Reality

The unfortunate reality of being a budget team is that there really isn’t room for more than two $6M players, and Staal and Ward are already signed for forseeable future. Would I rather sign a $6M top-pairing D-man than two D-men for $4M and $2M? Absolutely. But, given that we weren’t going to sign a $6M player, this is a solid move. If $4M was the ceiling for what we were going to be able to spend, Gleason is probably better than what JR would’ve been able to get on the open market with that money.
This leaves the team with five D-men signed for next year (Harrison / Faulk, Pitkanen / Gleason, and Joslin) and one RFA (McBain). That leaves room for at least one of Murphy, Dumoulin, Sanguinetti, et al. That’s a reasonable situation to have set up for next year. If more than one of those guys earns ice time, so be it, Joslin is expendable, and McBain should be relatively marketable if he needed to be moved to make room. But it’s also better than walking into next year needing two of those guys to be ready to fill out the lineup.

by NH_CaneFan on Jan 30, 2012 9:05 PM EST reply actions   1 recs

Pitkanen could become expendable

If Faulk and Harrison continue to improve and either McBain, Murphy or Dumoulin really step up, Pitkanen could become the expendable D-men. We only need so many offensive d-men. Packaged with a pick or prospect next year, he could fetch a top-6 forward, maybe top-3.

by plus2 on Jan 30, 2012 10:05 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

I don’t see Pitkanen becoming expendable unless Murphy shines. McBain isn’t good enough to replace Pitkanen. Dumoulin is a different breed of defenseman.

by hurricane9 on Jan 30, 2012 10:22 PM EST up reply actions  

Pits not expendable

Pits is another of those $4M guys that provide the glue for the team. Always with the possibility that he can improve us as much as a $6M guy if he puts his mind to it. We’ve got to keep these guys when we can.

by LewPuls1 on Jan 31, 2012 7:01 AM EST up reply actions  

No current D can provide what Pitkanen can provide with his slick puck movement, fluid and relatively fast skating, and ability to interrupt opposing teams offensive plays. What we saw at the begging of this year was very very good including finally trying out his booming blueline shot which is better than some thought. He took a home town discount to stay and I think JR knows the high value he got. Pitkanen is not going anywhere. However, if JR has a mental meltdown it will be a terrible decision in my opinion. Pitkanen type players are rare.

Hold out baits to entice the enemy. Feign disorder, and crush him.
Sun Tzu circa 4th Century BC

by hurricanefever on Jan 31, 2012 8:23 AM EST up reply actions  

I have to say I have not always been a fan of Pitts, but his play prior to his injury was pretty good.
I wouldn’t say he is untouchable but potential for the money is pretty high, so it would take a pretty good deal to move him. We really have not seen much of him under Muller and Co.

by Hockeydog on Jan 31, 2012 10:18 AM EST up reply actions  

Dumoulin, Dumoulin

All I hear about when we discuss our D-Men is Dumoulin, Dumoulin. Did he fall in a hole somewhere? Where is he?

by hockeythoughts on Jan 31, 2012 7:33 AM EST reply actions  

Dumoulin

The consensus seems to be that after Dumoulin’s NCAA season ends, he will sign with the Hurricanes. He’s definitely a top prospect and has improved each season. I’ll be happy if and when he signs. I don’t have any reason to think he won’t sign after this season; but there are no guarantees.

by abramsdoug on Jan 31, 2012 9:36 AM EST up reply actions  

Faulk has had a freakish transition to the NHL which you cannot expect from any young player, however Dumoulin is very similar in terms of NCAA production and accomplishment.

I don’t expect Dumoulin to be so fortunate… But I am just as excited about seeing Dumoulin in a Canes uniform next year as I was seeing Faulk coming over this year. And the record would show I was one of the few here predicting Faulk to be an impact player on the Canes this year.

by JussiJuice on Jan 31, 2012 10:58 AM EST via mobile up reply actions  

He hasn't really been eager to turn pro, so we haven't had a chance to see him in the pro style.

Personal attacks are the weapon of the ignorant.

Panthers '011: This is what we've been waiting for...we get to overpay the core of a 2-14 team!

by MichaelProcton on Jan 31, 2012 12:50 PM EST up reply actions  

Ballpark figures

I’ve been talking in terms of $4M and $6M guys, thought I’d ballpark a team.

Our ideal team might be:
3 $6M We already have two over that. Pits didn’t get to this level though we feared he might. Skinner probably will, when UFA, but how many years is that?

5 each of $4M, $2M, $1M

2 $.5M

That amounts to 20 players at $54M. Additional players would be callups at $.5M (three more for 23 on the team would be nice symmetry…)

Gleason and Pits are $4M guys. Ruu would be if he stayed. Jokinen we got cheaper than $4M but he might fit the category.

Sutter is a high $2M. Larose is near $2M (please don’t start). Allen, if we kept him, where would he be? In between 2 and 4.

The rest are lower than 2.

Possibly room to squeeze in a $4M guy. Or even a $6M guy, until Skinner approaches UFA. Too bad Cole wanted such a very long contract.

by LewPuls1 on Jan 31, 2012 12:11 PM EST reply actions  

Don’t forget Staal’s contract increases to $8+ million next season and $9+ million the season after that. Basically eats up most of the extra spending cash right there.

When that contract was signed it was under the assumption that the market and the budget would grow to fit it. Unfortunately it seems to be heading the other way.

With Skinner at risk of being sniped as an RFA (I would if I were another team) JR will have to pay him at least $4-5+ million at the end of next year. The kid is already better than Staal, id say he has a good case to make even more. Tavares is a similar case who got $5.5 million per out of his ELC.

I think the likelihood of us picking up another $4+ million player is pretty slim. Replacing or re-signing Ruutu alone might be in question.

by JussiJuice on Jan 31, 2012 12:42 PM EST via mobile up reply actions  

I think calling Skinner better than Staal is a bit premature.

Staal has a much more versatile, well-rounded game. Skinner is brilliant with the puck, but does what else?

Personal attacks are the weapon of the ignorant.

Panthers '011: This is what we've been waiting for...we get to overpay the core of a 2-14 team!

by MichaelProcton on Jan 31, 2012 12:52 PM EST up reply actions  

I agree that Skinner isn’t as good as Staal, not yet. But Skinner has a willingness to get back up and get back at the “enemy” that Staal doesn’t seem to have. As someone (I failed to record who) said in these pages a long time ago:

With Staal, just from appearances, the main message seems to be "I was robbed! These noncalls are going to cost us the game! It’s unfair!" With Skinner, the main message is more like "I’ll show you! Call whatever you like, but you can’t stop us from winning this game!"

Let’s hope Skinner never runs out of that juice. It’s a juice Staal never had.

by LewPuls1 on Jan 31, 2012 1:17 PM EST up reply actions  

Skinner has more potential than Staal, but he isn’t better than Staal yet.

by hurricane9 on Jan 31, 2012 2:50 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Canes Country, a hockey blog, information hub, and community center for fans of the Carolina Hurricanes.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Small
Spacek
Small
Zach Attack
Small
Jeremy Welsh has already made NHL history
Imported_photos_00002_small
David Booth over Erik "Binky" Cole
Small
If you can't see the puck, you aren't going to make the shot.
Wallpaper-carolina_hurricanes54_small
Jordan Staal a Cane?
C360_2010-08-21_06-51-18_small
THE HURRICANES 2012-2013 DRAFT; KEEPNG THE FORWARD MOMENTUM
Pictures_613_small
My Playoff Musings
Small
How would you spend $20 million?
169031_1308985529987_1391040303_31273096_8072617_n_small
Let's Go Checkers!

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recent FanShots

Hurricanes on the Clock at Hockey Wilderness
TSN Hockey Play of the Year.  Opportunity to vote for Skinner and to see some amazing NHL plays.
Frederik Andersen will likely stay in Sweden one more year
Alex Semin Free Agent
Places to watch hockey in Charlotte
Highlights of the Carolina Hurricanes 4-1 loss to the Florida Panthers on Saturday, April...
Highlights of the Carolina Hurricanes 2-1 shootout win over the Montreal Canadiens on Thursday,...
Highlights of the Carolina Hurricanes 2-1 win over the Ottawa Senators on Tuesday, April...
Tom Rowe hired to coach Lokomotiv Yaroslavl
Sights and Sounds From the Carolina Hurricanes 2011-12 Season

+ New FanShot All FanShots >

Hockey and Local Twitter

More great SB Nation Blogs

Tags


Managing Editor

Cc_shieldjpg_small Bob Wage

Editors

Cc_cory_small Cory Lavalette

95e2a02d-007c-4379-a43d-8331eb2e0d40_small Brian LeBlanc

Contributors

Tuomo_twitter_profile_small Jamie Kellner

Small C-Leaguer

Jeff-eric_small PackPride17

Shutdownline_small MyFriendCorey

Small TimDonelli